There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The P300 in event-related potentials (ERPs) has been implicated in outcome evaluation
and reward processing, but it is controversial as to what aspects of reward processing
it is sensitive. This study manipulated orthogonally reward valence, reward magnitude,
and expectancy towards reward magnitude in a monetary gambling task and observed both
the valence and the magnitude effects on the P300, but only when the amount of reward
was expected on the basis of a previous cue. The FRN (feedback-related negativity),
defined as the mean amplitudes of ERP responses to the loss or the gain outcome in
the 250-350 ms time window post-onset of feedback, was found to be sensitive not only
to reward valence, but also to expectancy towards reward magnitude and reward magnitude,
with the violation of expectancy and the small magnitude eliciting more negative-going
FRN. These findings demonstrate that while the FRN may function as a general mechanism
that evaluates whether the outcome is consistent or inconsistent with expectation,
the P300 is sensitive to a later, top-down controlled process of outcome evaluation,
into which factors related to the allocation of attentional resources, including reward
valence, reward magnitude, and magnitude expectancy, come to play.