52
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Health Impact of Symptomatic Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Deformity Types to United States Population Norms and Chronic Diseases

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Study Design.

          A retrospective analysis of a prospective, multicenter database.

          Objective.

          The aim of this study was to evaluate the health impact of symptomatic adult spinal deformity (SASD) by comparing Standard Form Version 2 (SF-36) scores for SASD with United States normative and chronic disease values.

          Summary of Background Data.

          Recent data have identified radiographic parameters correlating with poor health-related quality of life for SASD. Disability comparisons between SASD patients and patients with chronic diseases may provide further insight to the disease burden caused by SASD.

          Methods.

          Consecutive SASD patients, with no history of spine surgery, were enrolled into a multicenter database and evaluated for type and severity of spinal deformity. Baseline SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) values for SASD patients were compared with reported U.S. normative and chronic disease SF-36 scores. SF-36 scores were reported as normative-based scores (NBS) and evaluated for minimally clinical important difference (MCID).

          Results.

          Between 2008 and 2011, 497 SASD patients were prospectively enrolled and evaluated. Mean PCS for all SASD was lower than U.S. total population (ASD = 40.9; US = 50; P < 0.05). Generational decline in PCS for SASD patients with no other reported comorbidities was more rapid than U.S. norms ( P < 0.05). PCS worsened with lumbar scoliosis and increasing sagittal vertical axis (SVA). PCS scores for patients with isolated thoracic scoliosis were similar to values reported by individuals with chronic back pain (45.5 vs 45.7, respectively; P > 0.05), whereas patients with lumbar scoliosis combined with severe sagittal malalignment (SVA >10 cm) demonstrated worse PCS scores than values reported by patients with limited use of arms and legs (24.7 vs 29.1, respectively; P < 0.05).

          Conclusions.

          SASD is a heterogeneous condition that, depending upon the type and severity of the deformity, can have a debilitating impact on health often exceeding the disability of more recognized chronic diseases. Health care providers must be aware of the types of SASD that correlate with disability to facilitate appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and research efforts.

          Level of Evidence: 3.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          SF-36 health survey update.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis.

            Prospective multicenter study evaluating operative (OP) versus nonoperative (NONOP) treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

              The lack of a reliable, universally acceptable system for classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has made comparisons between various types of operative treatment an impossible task. Furthermore, long-term outcomes cannot be determined because of the great variations in the description of study groups. We developed a new classification system with three components: curve type (1 through 6), a lumbar spine modifier (A, B, or C), and a sagittal thoracic modifier (-, N, or +). The six curve types have specific characteristics, on coronal and sagittal radiographs, that differentiate structural and nonstructural curves in the proximal thoracic, main thoracic, and thoracolumbar/lumbar regions. The lumbar spine modifier is based on the relationship of the center sacral vertical line to the apex of the lumbar curve, and the sagittal thoracic modifier is based on the sagittal curve measurement from the fifth to the twelfth thoracic level. A minus sign represents a curve of less than +10 degrees, N represents a curve of 10 degrees to 40 degrees, and a plus sign represents a curve of more than +40 degrees. Five surgeons, members of the Scoliosis Research Society who had developed the new system and who had previously tested the reliability of the King classification on radiographs of twenty-seven patients, measured the same radiographs (standing coronal and lateral as well as supine side-bending views) to test the reliability of the new classification. A randomly chosen independent group of seven surgeons, also members of the Scoliosis Research Society, tested the reliability and validity of the classification as well. The interobserver and intraobserver kappa values for the curve type were, respectively, 0.92 and 0.83 for the five developers of the system and 0.740 and 0.893 for the independent group of seven scoliosis surgeons. In the independent group, the mean interobserver and intraobserver kappa values were 0.800 and 0.840 for the lumbar modifier and 0.938 and 0.970 for the sagittal thoracic modifier. These kappa values were all in the good-to-excellent range (>0.75), except for the interobserver reliability of the independent group for the curve type (kappa = 0.74), which fell just below this level. This new two-dimensional classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, as tested by two groups of surgeons, was shown to be much more reliable than the King system. Additional studies are necessary to determine the versatility, reliability, and accuracy of the classification for defining the vertebrae to be included in an arthrodesis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
                Spine
                BRS
                Spine
                Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
                0362-2436
                1528-1159
                February 2016
                29 January 2016
                : 41
                : 3
                : 224-233
                Affiliations
                []Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children
                []Rocky Mountain Scoliosis & Spine, Denver, CO
                []Cornell University School of Medicine, New York, NY
                [§ ]Emory University, Department of Economics, Atlanta, GA
                [|| ]New York University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY
                []University of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Charlottesville, VA
                [# ]University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, San Francisco
                [∗∗ ]San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, CA
                [†† ]Hospital for Special Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY
                [‡‡ ]Washington University, Saint Louis, MO
                [§§ ]University of Kansas School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kansas City, KS
                [|||| ]University of Oregon School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Portland, OR
                [¶¶ ]University of California Davis School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sacramento, CA
                [## ]Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baltimore, MD
                [∗∗∗ ]Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, TX.
                Author notes
                Address correspondence and reprint requests to Shay Bess, MD, New York University School of Medicine/Hospital for Joint Diseases, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 301 East 17th Street, Suite 400, New York, NY 10003; E-mail: Shay_bess@ 123456hotmail.com
                Article
                00010
                10.1097/BRS.0000000000001202
                4718181
                26571174
                cd57a1f8-2da6-4419-9a8a-f85879e0ce0b
                Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

                History
                : 15 June 2015
                : 23 July 2015
                : 16 August 2015
                Categories
                Deformity
                Custom metadata
                TRUE

                adult spinal deformity,disability,health related quality of life,sf-36

                Comments

                Comment on this article