21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      More than a publisher.
      1949-1924

      Subscribe to our anniversary newsletter to learn more about the Hogrefe Group throughout the year – and be automatically entered for a chance to win prizes every month: SUBSCRIBE NOW

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Hate Speech as an Indicator for the State of the Society : Effects of Hateful User Comments on Perceived Social Dynamics

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. Previous research indicates that user comments serve as exemplars and thus have an effect on perceived public opinion. Moreover, they also shape the attitudes of their readers. However, studies almost exclusively focus on controversial issues if they explore the consequences of user comments for attitudes and perceived public opinion. The current study wants to find out if hate speech attacking social groups due to characteristics such as religion or sexual orientation also has an effect on the way people think about these groups and how they think society perceives them. Moreover, we also investigated the effects of hate speech on prejudiced attitudes. To explore the hypotheses and research questions, we preregistered and conducted a 3 × 2 experimental study varying the amount of hate speech (none/few/many hateful comments) and the group that was attacked (Muslims/homosexuals). Results show no effects of the amount of hate speech on perceived public opinion for both groups. However, if homosexuals are attacked, hate speech negatively affects perceived social cohesion. Moreover, for both groups, we find interaction effects between preexisting attitudes and hate speech for discriminating demands. This indicates that hate speech can increase polarization in society.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

          G*Power (Erdfelder, Faul, & Buchner, 1996) was designed as a general stand-alone power analysis program for statistical tests commonly used in social and behavioral research. G*Power 3 is a major extension of, and improvement over, the previous versions. It runs on widely used computer platforms (i.e., Windows XP, Windows Vista, and Mac OS X 10.4) and covers many different statistical tests of the t, F, and chi2 test families. In addition, it includes power analyses for z tests and some exact tests. G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested. Like its predecessors, G*Power 3 is free.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                zmp
                Journal of Media Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1864-1105
                2151-2388
                May 28, 2021
                January 2022
                : 34
                : 1
                : 3-15
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Communication, University of Vienna, Austria
                [ 2 ]Department of Communication, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany
                Author notes
                Svenja Schäfer, Department of Communication, University of Vienna, Kolingasse 14-16, 1040 Vienna, Austria svenja.schaefer@ 123456univie.ac.at
                Article
                zmp_34_1_3
                10.1027/1864-1105/a000294
                cda38f98-444b-431e-b91c-d7fccc2767bd
                Copyright @ 2021
                History
                : May 6, 2020
                : January 29, 2021
                : February 8, 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                Psychology,Communication & Media studies
                hate speech,user comments,perceived public opinion,polarization,experimental research

                Comments

                Comment on this article