5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Opposite effects of motion dynamics on the Ebbinghaus and corridor illusions.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We recently showed that motion dynamics greatly enhance the magnitude of certain size contrast illusions, such as the Ebbinghaus and Delboeuf illusions. Here, we extend our study of the effect of motion dynamics on size illusions through a novel dynamic corridor illusion, in which a single target translates along a corridor background. Across three psychophysical experiments, we quantify the effects of stimulus dynamics on the Ebbinghaus and corridor illusions across different viewing conditions. The results revealed that stimulus dynamics had opposite effects on these different classes of size illusions. Whereas dynamic motion enhanced the magnitude of the Ebbinghaus illusion, it attenuated the magnitude the corridor illusion. Our results highlight precision-driven weighting of visual cues by neural circuits computing perceived object size. This hypothesis is consistent with observations beyond size perception and may represent a more general principle of cue integration in the visual system.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Atten Percept Psychophys
          Attention, perception & psychophysics
          Springer Science and Business Media LLC
          1943-393X
          1943-3921
          May 2020
          : 82
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Psychology, College of the Holy Cross, 1 College Street, Worcester, MA, 01610, USA. rmruczek@holycross.edu.
          [2 ] Department of Psychology, Worcester State University, Worcester, MA, USA. rmruczek@holycross.edu.
          [3 ] Department of Psychology, Eastern Oregon University, La Grande, OR, USA.
          [4 ] Department of Psychology, Worcester State University, Worcester, MA, USA.
          [5 ] Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.
          Article
          10.3758/s13414-019-01927-w
          10.3758/s13414-019-01927-w
          31898067
          cde179ac-5990-49a9-a984-72237b56c16c
          History

          Visual perception,Bayesian modeling,Perceptual organization

          Comments

          Comment on this article