3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of interventions that impact alcohol and other drug-related harms in licensed entertainment settings and outdoor music festivals

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Harms associated with the use of alcohol and other drugs (AOD) in licensed entertainment settings (LES) and outdoor music festivals (OMF) are ongoing public health and criminal justice concerns. This systematic review provides a comprehensive, synthesized report on the evidence base of interventions that impact harm in these settings, and how they affect health, behavioral, and criminal justice outcomes.

          Methods

          Nine databases were searched for experimental and observational studies published between 2010 and 2021. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed, published in English, described interventions which could impact AOD-related harms in LES or OMF (and were delivered in these environments), and reported on health, criminal justice and/or behavioral outcomes. Methodological quality was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project’s Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies and the Critical Appraisal Skills Program for qualitative studies. A narrative synthesis was conducted to synthesize outcomes across studies. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020140004).

          Results

          Of the 48,303 studies screened, 100 met the inclusion criteria. 86 focused solely on reducing alcohol-related harm, 7 on reducing illicit drug-related harm, and 7 on both. Most ( n = 88) focused on LES and evaluated changes in laws and regulations ( n = 28) and/or multicomponent interventions/policies ( n = 41). Multicomponent interventions showed the best results for both health (62% positive) and criminal justice (84% positive) outcomes, with 71% of studies being rated as strong quality. There was also good evidence to support the careful application of trading hour restrictions and limited but promising evidence to support medical services and drug checking.

          Conclusion

          The breadth, quality and volume of evidence regarding what works in reducing AOD-related harm in recreational settings have increased in the past decade, particularly regarding LES. Findings support onsite medical services (reducing ambulance transfer rates), multicomponent interventions targeting alcohol accessibility and availability (reducing assaults), and drug checking services, but suggest other interventions such as drug detection dogs may exacerbate harm. Further, higher quality research is required to address identified gaps in the evidence base, particularly on optimal interventions within OMF, around illicit drugs more broadly and in the Global South.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12954-024-00949-4.

          Related collections

          Most cited references113

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

          The methods and results of systematic reviews should be reported in sufficient detail to allow users to assess the trustworthiness and applicability of the review findings. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was developed to facilitate transparent and complete reporting of systematic reviews and has been updated (to PRISMA 2020) to reflect recent advances in systematic review methodology and terminology. Here, we present the explanation and elaboration paper for PRISMA 2020, where we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews. We hope that changes to the content and structure of PRISMA 2020 will facilitate uptake of the guideline and lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of systematic reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            How Many Studies Do You Need?: A Primer on Statistical Power for Meta-Analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews

              Systematic reviews aide the analysis and dissemination of evidence, using rigorous and transparent methods to generate empirically attained answers to focused research questions. Identifying all evidence relevant to the research questions is an essential component, and challenge, of systematic reviews. Gray literature, or evidence not published in commercial publications, can make important contributions to a systematic review. Gray literature can include academic papers, including theses and dissertations, research and committee reports, government reports, conference papers, and ongoing research, among others. It may provide data not found within commercially published literature, providing an important forum for disseminating studies with null or negative results that might not otherwise be disseminated. Gray literature may thusly reduce publication bias, increase reviews' comprehensiveness and timeliness, and foster a balanced picture of available evidence. Gray literature's diverse formats and audiences can present a significant challenge in a systematic search for evidence. However, the benefits of including gray literature may far outweigh the cost in time and resource needed to search for it, and it is important for it to be included in a systematic review or review of evidence. A carefully thought out gray literature search strategy may be an invaluable component of a systematic review. This narrative review provides guidance about the benefits of including gray literature in a systematic review, and sources for searching through gray literature. An illustrative example of a search for evidence within gray literature sources is presented to highlight the potential contributions of such a search to a systematic review. Benefits and challenges of gray literature search methods are discussed, and recommendations made.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                monica.barratt@rmit.edu.au
                Journal
                Harm Reduct J
                Harm Reduct J
                Harm Reduction Journal
                BioMed Central (London )
                1477-7517
                21 February 2024
                21 February 2024
                2024
                : 21
                : 47
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, ( https://ror.org/03r8z3t63) Sydney, Australia
                [2 ]Centre for Crime Policy and Research, Flinders University, ( https://ror.org/01kpzv902) Adelaide, Australia
                [3 ]The School of Law, Society and Criminology, and Centre for Criminology, Law and Justice, Faculty of Law and Justice, UNSW Sydney, ( https://ror.org/03r8z3t63) Sydney, Australia
                [4 ]Griffith Criminology Institute, Griffith University, ( https://ror.org/02sc3r913) Brisbane, Australia
                [5 ]School of Psychology, University of Queensland, ( https://ror.org/00rqy9422) Brisbane, Australia
                [6 ]Centre for Drug Use, Addictive and Anti-Social Behaviour Research, School of Psychology, Deakin University, ( https://ror.org/02czsnj07) Geelong, Australia
                [7 ]Social Equity Research Centre and Digital Ethnography Research Centre, RMIT University, ( https://ror.org/04ttjf776) 124 La Trobe Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000 Australia
                Article
                949
                10.1186/s12954-024-00949-4
                10882826
                38383344
                ce21224a-92e1-4723-8205-4e83f39b6d62
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 30 November 2023
                : 26 January 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: Australian Government Research Training Program
                Funded by: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Health & Social care
                harm reduction,alcohol,illicit drugs,licensed entertainment settings,music festivals/festivals,systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article