2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
5 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Storytelling as a research tool and intervention around public health perceptions and behaviour: a protocol for a systematic narrative review

      protocol

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          There is a growing trend to use storytelling as a research tool to extract information and/or as an intervention to effect change in the public knowledge, attitudes and behaviour (KAB) in relation to public health issues, primarily those with a strong element of disease prevention. However, evidence of its use in either or both capacities is limited. This protocol proposes a systematic narrative review of peer-reviewed, published literature on the use of storytelling as a research tool within the public health arena.

          Methods and analysis

          Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center), Web of Science, Art and Humanities database (ProQuest), Scopus and Google Scholar will be searched for studies that look at the use of storytelling in the research of pressing current public health issues, for example, vaccinations, antimicrobial resistance, climate change and cancer screening. The review will synthesise evidence of how storytelling is used as a research tool to (a) gain insights into KAB and (b) to effect change in KAB when used as an intervention. Included studies will be selected according to carefully defined criteria relevant to public health issues of interest, and data from qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies will be extracted with a customised data extraction form. A narrative synthesis will be performed according to Economic and Social Research Council guidance from Popay, J, 2006.The study protocol follows the recommendations by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P).

          Ethics and dissemination

          Formal ethical approval is not required for this study, as no primary data will be collected. Dissemination will involve publishing results of this study in relevant peer-reviewed journal(s). Where possible, the study results will also be presented as posters or talks at relevant medical conferences and meetings.

          PROSPERO registration number

          CRD42019124704

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research

            In general practice, qualitative research contributes as significantly as quantitative research, in particular regarding psycho-social aspects of patient-care, health services provision, policy setting, and health administrations. In contrast to quantitative research, qualitative research as a whole has been constantly critiqued, if not disparaged, by the lack of consensus for assessing its quality and robustness. This article illustrates with five published studies how qualitative research can impact and reshape the discipline of primary care, spiraling out from clinic-based health screening to community-based disease monitoring, evaluation of out-of-hours triage services to provincial psychiatric care pathways model and finally, national legislation of core measures for children's healthcare insurance. Fundamental concepts of validity, reliability, and generalizability as applicable to qualitative research are then addressed with an update on the current views and controversies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Narrative Medicine

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2019
                3 December 2019
                : 9
                : 12
                : e030597
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentInstitute of Health Informatics , University College London , London, UK
                [2 ] departmentSchool of the Arts, English and Drama , University of Loughborough , Loughborough, UK
                [3 ] departmentInstitute of Health Informatics , UCL , London, UK
                [4 ] departmentInstitute of Epidemiology and Health , University College London , London, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Becky McCall; becky.mccall.18@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Article
                bmjopen-2019-030597
                10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030597
                6924770
                31796479
                ce305b74-eea7-476f-9c70-53e1b3734fbf
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 21 March 2019
                : 26 August 2019
                : 16 October 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Foundation (MRF);
                Award ID: MRF-145-0004-TPG-AVISO
                Categories
                Public Health
                Protocol
                1506
                1724
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                storytelling,public health,perception,attitudes,behaviour
                Medicine
                storytelling, public health, perception, attitudes, behaviour

                Comments

                Comment on this article