46
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Most posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques use a tibial bone tunnel, which results in an acute bend in the graft as it passes over the posterior portion of the tibial plateau.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Am J Sports Med
          The American journal of sports medicine
          SAGE Publications
          0363-5465
          0363-5465
          2002
          : 30
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Biomechanics Research Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California at Los Angeles, Center for Health Sciences, Box 956902, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6902, USA.
          Article
          10.1177/03635465020300030201
          12016068
          ce372be7-7714-4c34-b5a9-2e714a1998f5
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          Related Documents Log