1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      What affects the magnitude of age-related dual-task costs in working memory? The role of stimulus domain and access to semantic representations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although there is evidence that the effect of including a concurrent processing demand on the storage of information in working memory is disproportionately larger for older than younger adults, not all studies show this age-related impairment, and the critical factors responsible for any such impairment remain elusive. Here we assess whether domain overlap between storage and processing activities, and access to semantic representations, are important determinants of performance in a sample of younger and older adults ( N = 119). We developed four versions of a processing task by manipulating the type of stimuli involved (either verbal or non-verbal) and the decision that participants had to make about the stimuli presented on the screen. Participants either had to perform a spatial judgement, in deciding whether the verbal or non-verbal item was presented above or below the centre of the screen, or a semantic judgement, in deciding whether the stimulus refers to something living or not living. The memory task was serial-ordered recall of visually presented letters. The study revealed a large increase in age-related memory differences when concurrent processing was required. These differences were smaller when storage and processing activities both used verbal materials. Dual-task effects on processing were also disproportionate for older adults. Age differences in processing performance appeared larger for tasks requiring spatial decisions rather than semantic decisions. We discuss these findings in relation to three competing frameworks of working memory and the extant literature on cognitive ageing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references104

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

            To develop a 10-minute cognitive screening tool (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA) to assist first-line physicians in detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a clinical state that often progresses to dementia. Validation study. A community clinic and an academic center. Ninety-four patients meeting MCI clinical criteria supported by psychometric measures, 93 patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score > or =17), and 90 healthy elderly controls (NC). The MoCA and MMSE were administered to all participants, and sensitivity and specificity of both measures were assessed for detection of MCI and mild AD. Using a cutoff score 26, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 18% to detect MCI, whereas the MoCA detected 90% of MCI subjects. In the mild AD group, the MMSE had a sensitivity of 78%, whereas the MoCA detected 100%. Specificity was excellent for both MMSE and MoCA (100% and 87%, respectively). MCI as an entity is evolving and somewhat controversial. The MoCA is a brief cognitive screening tool with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting MCI as currently conceptualized in patients performing in the normal range on the MMSE.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Estimating the Dimension of a Model

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
                Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)
                QJP
                spqjp
                Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                1747-0218
                1747-0226
                27 November 2020
                April 2021
                : 74
                : 4
                : 682-704
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
                [2 ]School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
                [3 ]Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
                [4 ]Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
                [5 ]Department of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [*]Agnieszka J Jaroslawska, School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK. Email: a.jaroslawska@ 123456qub.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1358-7512
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3711-4338
                Article
                10.1177_1747021820970744
                10.1177/1747021820970744
                8044618
                33073696
                ceebff37-1295-4d5c-b2e5-2878922d9147
                © Experimental Psychology Society 2020

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 2 April 2020
                : 6 October 2020
                : 11 October 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Economic and Social Research Council, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000269;
                Award ID: ES/N010728/1
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts1

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                working memory,dual-task,ageing,storage,processing
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                working memory, dual-task, ageing, storage, processing

                Comments

                Comment on this article