16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Epicardial fat, abdominal adiposity and insulin resistance in obese pre-pubertal and early pubertal children.

      Atherosclerosis
      Adiposity, Child, Female, Homeostasis, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Intra-Abdominal Fat, pathology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Models, Biological, Obesity, physiopathology, Pericardium, Puberty, physiology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To assess the cross-sectional association of epicardial fat with insulin resistance, major abdominal adipose depots, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in obese pre-pubertal and early pubertal children. By using magnetic resonance imaging in 30 pre-pubertal and early pubertal patients [21 males, Tanner Stage I-II, median age 11.2 (2.95) y, BMI z-score 2.56 ± 0.11 SDS], visceral (VAT), subcutaneous (SAT), epicardial adipose tissues (EAT) and hepatic fat fraction (HFF) were estimated. Lipid profile, liver function tests, circulating adipokines and markers of inflammation [leptin, adiponectin, tumor necrosis factors-alpha (TNF-alpha), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukins 6 and 10 (IL-6, IL-10)] were assayed. Insulin resistance was estimated by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. In 14 insulin resistant children (HOMA-IR >2.5), median values of EAT were significantly higher than in insulin sensitive mates [54.0 (35.45) cm(3) vs. 27.2 (17.03) cm(3); p = 0.03]. Moreover, EAT performed no differently in identifying insulin resistant patients (AUC 0.737; 95% CI 0.538-0.936; p = 0.028) from VAT (AUC 0.772; 95% CI 0.599-0.945; p = 0.011); SAT (AUC 0.795; 95% CI 0.628-0.0.962; p = 0.006); and HFF (AUC 0.777; 95% CI 0.607-0.947; p = 0.010). Stepwise regression analysis showed that EAT (β = 0.025; 95% CI 0.012-0.038, p = 0.001) and CRP (β = 0.622; 95% CI 0.069-0.238, p = 0.002) predicted HOMA-IR (R(2) = 0.71; p = 0.001), while VAT, SAT and HFF were excluded from the model. In pre-pubertal and early pubertal obese children, EAT is a significant marker of increased insulin resistance and associated cardiovascular risk. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article