1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Venetoclax exposure‐efficacy and exposure‐safety relationships in patients with treatment‐naïve acute myeloid leukemia who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study evaluated venetoclax population pharmacokinetics (popPK) in patients with treatment‐naïve acute myeloid leukemia and assessed the relationship between venetoclax exposure and clinical response for venetoclax in combination with either a hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low‐dose cytarabine (LDAC). A total of 771 patients who received venetoclax from 5 Phase 1–3 studies were included in the popPK model. Exposure‐response analyses included data from 575 patients for venetoclax/placebo plus HMA and 279 patients for venetoclax/placebo plus LDAC. The popPK model successfully characterized venetoclax plasma concentrations over time and confirmed venetoclax exposure did not vary significantly with age, weight, sex, mild to moderate hepatic impairment, or mild to severe renal impairment. Asian patients had 67% higher mean relative bioavailability than non‐Asian patients, however the range of exposures in Asian patients was similar to non‐Asian patients. For all efficacy endpoints with both treatment combinations, efficacy was higher in the venetoclax treatment groups compared with the respective control arm of placebo plus azacitidine or LDAC. Within patients who received venetoclax, no significant exposure‐efficacy relationships were identified for either treatment combination, indicating that the beneficial effects of venetoclax were already maximized in the dose ranges studied. There was no apparent effect of venetoclax exposure on treatment‐emergent Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia or infections for either combination. Rates of treatment‐emergent Grade ≥3 neutropenia were higher in the venetoclax treatment arms compared with the respective control arms; however, within patients who received venetoclax, there was only a shallow relationship or no apparent relationship with venetoclax exposure for venetoclax plus HMA or LDAC, respectively. Along with the efficacy and safety data previously published, the exposure‐response analyses support the venetoclax dose regimens of 400 mg once daily (QD) plus HMA and 600 mg QD plus LDAC in treatment‐naïve AML patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia

          Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a dismal prognosis, even after treatment with a hypomethylating agent. Azacitidine added to venetoclax had promising efficacy in a previous phase 1b study.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study.

            Elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) with acute myeloid leukaemia have poor outcomes and no effective standard-of-care therapy exists. Treatment with hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine and decitabine is common, but responses are modest and typically short-lived. The oral anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 protein inhibitor, venetoclax, has shown promising single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia and preclinical data suggested synergy between hypomethylating agents and venetoclax, which led to this combination phase 1b study.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Efficacy and Biological Correlates of Response in a Phase II Study of Venetoclax Monotherapy in Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.

              We present a phase II, single-arm study evaluating 800 mg daily venetoclax, a highly selective, oral small-molecule B-cell leukemia/lymphoma-2 (BCL2) inhibitor in patients with high-risk relapsed/refractory acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Responses were evaluated following revised International Working Group (IWG) criteria. The overall response rate was 19%; an additional 19% of patients demonstrated antileukemic activity not meeting IWG criteria (partial bone marrow response and incomplete hematologic recovery). Twelve (38%) patients had isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 mutations, of whom 4 (33%) achieved complete response or complete response with incomplete blood count recovery. Six (19%) patients had BCL2-sensitive protein index at screening, which correlated with time on study. BH3 profiling was consistent with on-target BCL2 inhibition and identified potential resistance mechanisms. Common adverse events included nausea, diarrhea and vomiting (all grades), and febrile neutropenia and hypokalemia (grade 3/4). Venetoclax demonstrated activity and acceptable tolerability in patients with AML and adverse features.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                deanna.brackman@abbvie.com
                jiuhong.zha@abbvie.com
                Journal
                Hematol Oncol
                Hematol Oncol
                10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1069
                HON
                Hematological Oncology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0278-0232
                1099-1069
                09 February 2022
                April 2022
                : 40
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/hon.v40.2 )
                : 269-279
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics AbbVie Inc. North Chicago Illinois USA
                [ 2 ] Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics AbbVie Deutschland GmbH Co. KG Ludwigshafen Germany
                [ 3 ] Oncology Development AbbVie Inc. North Chicago Illinois USA
                [ 4 ] Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Clinical Haematology Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne Australia
                [ 6 ] Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research Melbourne Australia
                [ 7 ] Clinical Pharmacology Genentech Inc. South San Francisco California USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Deanna Brackman and Jiuhong Zha, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, AbbVie Inc., 1 N Waukegan Rd, North Chicago, IL, USA.

                Email: deanna.brackman@ 123456abbvie.com and jiuhong.zha@ 123456abbvie.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-4554
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9261-1583
                Article
                HON2964
                10.1002/hon.2964
                9303465
                35043428
                cf56ab88-ea1d-449d-a99e-678d1a3686e5
                © 2022 AbbVie Inc. Hematological Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

                History
                : 06 August 2021
                : 26 May 2021
                : 11 January 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 11, Words: 4974
                Funding
                Funded by: AbbVie and Genentech , doi 10.13039/100006483;
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                April 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.1.7 mode:remove_FC converted:21.07.2022

                acute myeloid leukemia,dose selection,exposure‐response,hypomethylating agents,low‐dose cytarabine,venetoclax

                Comments

                Comment on this article