1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Determinants of nurse satisfaction using insulin pen devices with safety needles: an exploratory factor analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          A paucity of data exists to examine nurses’ satisfaction with the use of insulin pens with safety needles in hospitalized patients with diabetes. We investigated major determinants of nurses’ preference of the method of insulin administration in the context of a General Hospital in Northern Italy.

          Methods

          Consecutive patients admitted to three hospital units of different care intensity requiring insulin received insulin therapy through either the vial/syringe method (October to December 2012) or pen/safety needles with dual-ended protection method (January to March 2013). Before the implementation of insulin pens, floor nurses received a specific training program for proper insulin pen injection technique including individual testing of the devices (pen/safety needles). At the end of the study, nurses completed the Nursing Satisfaction Survey Questionnaire. Cronbach’s alpha was used to determine the internal consistency and reliability of the questionnaire. Major determinants of satisfaction were investigated through an exploratory factor analysis. The association between each retained factor and time spent to teach patients how to self-inject insulin with pen devices was also investigated.

          Results

          Fifty-three out of 60 nurses (mean age ± SD 36.2 ± 8.5 years, 85 % women, 57 % with 10+ years of working experience) returned the questionnaire. Internal consistency of the questionnaire was satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.9). Three months after their introduction, about 92 % of nurses considered pen devices an “improvement” over the vial/syringe method. Two factors explained 85 % of nurses’ satisfaction, one related to convenience and ease of use, and the other to satisfaction/time spent for dose preparation and administration. The latter factor was inversely correlated with time spent on patients’ training tasks.

          Conclusions

          Nurses’ satisfaction with pen devices was higher than previously reported, possibly reinforced by safety needles with dual-ended protection. Perceived workload was a major determinant of nurse satisfaction using pen devices with safety needles. To facilitate the introduction of insulin pens in the hospital setting, it should be specifically addressed during training programs in the switch-over period.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

          Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reusable and disposable insulin pens for the treatment of diabetes: understanding the global differences in user preference and an evaluation of inpatient insulin pen use.

            Insulin is essential for the management of type 1 diabetes and is more commonly being used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Insulin pen devices were first introduced over 20 years ago and have evolved to provide significant practical advantages compared with the vial and syringe. Pen devices are now used by patients with diabetes worldwide, but there are marked geographical variations in the use of reusable and disposable pens. In some countries the vial and syringe is still the most popular method of administering insulin, whereas in other countries the use of reusable or disposable pens is more prevalent. Therefore, the aim of this review is to discuss the factors that seem to be involved in these differences, which include patient access to insulin, cost, and physician/patient awareness and preference. Inpatient use of insulin is also common, and the use of insulin pens could offer substantial benefits in this patient population, not only during the admission period but also after discharge from the hospital. However, the evidence base for inpatient use is still weak, and more studies are needed to investigate the use of insulin pens in this patient population.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices versus conventional vial and syringe.

              Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) associated with insulin therapy are potentially important determinants of adherence to diabetes management programs. This article reviews published evidence of PROs over the past 3 decades in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and/or type 2 diabetes (T2D) who used vial and syringe for insulin delivery compared to those who used insulin pens. Based on predetermined selection criteria, articles were identified through a search of primary sources published from January 1980 to February 2008. Two independent reviewers determined study eligibility and performed a detailed evaluation of the articles that met the selection criteria. Of the 124 articles screened, 41 met selection criteria. Approximately 75% of the selected articles were published between 1990 and 2008, and a majority (78%) of the research studies was conducted outside the United States. Most (>75%) of the studies evaluated male and female patients with T1D and/or T2D and mean ages around 45 years. Studies used varied comparative study designs with follow-up periods ranging from 2 weeks to 5 years. The PROs assessed in these articles included preference, acceptability, treatment satisfaction, ease of use, convenience, injection pain, handling, and dosing. Most articles (n = 36) showed more favorable PROs for insulin pen users compared to vial and syringe users. These findings have potential clinical and policy implications for patients, diabetes care providers, and/or payers to make evidence-based decisions regarding ways to facilitate initiation and management of insulin therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                giovanni.veronesi@uninsubria.it
                carmine.poerio@gmail.com
                alessandra_braus@ospedale.treviglio.bg.it
                maurizio_destro@ospedale.treviglio.bg.it
                lavinia_gilberti@ospedale.treviglio.bg.it
                giovanni_meroni@ospedale.treviglio.bg.it
                estelladavis@creighton.edu
                +39 0363 424385 , antonio_bossi@ospedale.treviglio.bg.it
                Journal
                Clin Diabetes Endocrinol
                Clin Diabetes Endocrinol
                Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology
                BioMed Central (London )
                2055-8260
                9 November 2015
                9 November 2015
                2015
                : 1
                : 15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.18147.3b, ISNI 0000000121724807, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, , Research Centre in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Insubria, ; Varese, Italy
                [2 ]Metabolic Diseases and Diabetes Unit, A.O. Ospedale Treviglio-Caravaggio, P.le Ospedale, 1 – 24047 Treviglio, BG Italy
                [3 ]Pharmacy Unit, A.O. Ospedale Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio, BG Italy
                [4 ]Medical Science Department, A.O. Ospedale Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio, BG Italy
                [5 ]Hospital Health Management Direction, A.O. Ospedale Treviglio-Caravaggio, Treviglio, BG Italy
                [6 ]GRID grid.254748.8, ISNI 0000000419368876, , Creighton University School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, ; Omaha, NE USA
                Article
                15
                10.1186/s40842-015-0015-3
                5471734
                cfbd676e-f423-4878-b611-9f8b2bc8fff0
                © Veronesi et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 16 January 2015
                : 18 August 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                nurse satisfaction,insulin therapy,insulin pens,safety needles,inpatient care

                Comments

                Comment on this article