7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of stent design on side branch occlusion after coronary stent placement

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risk of side branch occlusion during coronary angioplasty.

          To assess the risk of side branch occlusion during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), 600 consecutive procedures were analyzed. On the basis of pre-PTCA angiograms of 557 patients in whom the balloon was actually inflated, 365 side branches in 302 patients (54% of patients) were deemed in jeopardy. A total of 122 side branches in 102 patients (18%) originated from the lesion segment itself, i.e., their take-off was narrowed (Group I, 33% of side branches at risk), whereas 243 side branches in 214 patients (38%) originated from the immediate vicinity of the stenosis in a way that they were subjected to temporary occlusion during balloon dilatation (Group II, 67% of side branches at risk). Patency of side branches was determined by consensus of 2 observers. Criteria for occlusion were disappearance, filling by collaterals, or stagnation of flow. After PTCA, 20 of 365 side branches (5%) were occluded and associated with chest pain in 5 patients, creatine kinase increase in 6, left anterior hemiblock, septal Q waves and transient atrial fibrillation in 1 and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia in 1 of the 20 patients. Exercise tolerance did not decrease. No local predilection for side branch occlusion was evident. Seventeen of 122 side branches (14%) occluded in Group I, compared with 3 of 243 (1%) in Group II (p less than 0.001). Thus, more than half of the patients who underwent PTCA had side branches at risk for iatrogenic occlusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incidence and angiographic predictors of side branch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stenting.

            We evaluated the incidence, angiographic predictors, and clinical outcome of side branch occlusion (SBO) following high-pressure intracoronary stenting in 175 patients. All stent implants during a 7-month period were reviewed for the incidence of major (>1 mm) SBO. Side branches were further characterized based on side branch and index lesion morphology. Clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization rates) were determined at 9 months. A total of 175 patients (182 lesions) had 224 major side branches covered by intracoronary stents. Of these, 43 (19%) occluded. Most SBOs (29 of 43 [67%]) occurred after poststent dilation using high-pressure inflations (15.3 +/- 3.3 atmospheres). No clinical characteristics correlated with SBO. By multivariate analysis, those side branches with >50% ostial narrowing that arose from within or just beyond the diseased portion of the parent vessel (threatened side branch morphologies) were a powerful angiographic predictor of SBO (odds ratio 40, 95% confidence interval, 14 to 130, p <0.0001). At 9-month follow-up there was no difference in combined clinical events between those patients with and without SBO. These data demonstrate that side branches with ostial stenoses in continuity with diseased parent lesions were at risk of occlusion following stenting. SBO, however, was not associated with adverse clinical outcome. These findings lend support to plaque shift ("snow plow effect") as the mechanism behind SBO following stent placement.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fate of lesion-related side branches after coronary artery stenting.

              The aim of this study was to assess the immediate and long-term patency of lesion-associated side branches after coronary artery stenting. The possible adverse effects related to implantation of coronary stents are not completely known. An important potential complication of stenting is side branch occlusion due to mechanical obstruction or thrombosis. Serial coronary angiography was performed in 153 patients (167 lesions) at baseline, after conventional balloon angioplasty, immediately after Palmaz-Schatz stent placement and at 6 months. The patency of side branches, where present, was analyzed at each of these points. Of 167 lesions stented, 57 stent placements spanned 66 side branches with a diameter > or = 1 mm. Twenty-seven (41%) of these side branches had > or = 50% ostial stenosis before standard balloon angioplasty. Six side branches became occluded after standard balloon angioplasty and remained occluded after stenting. Of the 60 side branches patent after conventional angioplasty, 57 (95%) remained patent immediately after stenting. All three side branches that became occluded after stenting had > or = 50% ostial stenosis at baseline. All 60 side branches, including the 3 initially occluded after stenting, were patent at 6-month follow-up. These findings demonstrate that 1) acute side branch occlusion due to coronary stenting occurs infrequently; 2) when side branch occlusion occurs, it is associated with intrinsic ostial disease; and 3) the patency of side branch ostia is well maintained at long-term follow-up.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
                Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent.
                Wiley
                1522-1946
                1522-726X
                January 2001
                January 2001
                2001
                : 52
                : 1
                : 18-23
                Article
                10.1002/1522-726X(200101)52:1<18::AID-CCD1006>3.0.CO;2-#
                d0a45cb7-b74e-4b59-9338-e894d08c07a8
                © 2001

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article