4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors Associated With Humeral Avulsion of Glenohumeral Ligament Lesions in Patients With Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Analysis of the MOON Shoulder Instability Cohort

      research-article
      , MD * , , MD, , MD, , MD, , MPH, , BA, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, MOON Shoulder Group collaborators, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, MPH, , MD, , MD, PhD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, MSc, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD, , MD
      Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
      SAGE Publications
      humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament, magnetic resonance imaging, risk factors, shoulder instability

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament (HAGL) lesions are an uncommon cause of anterior glenohumeral instability and may occur in isolation or combination with other pathologies. As HAGL lesions are difficult to detect via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy, they can remain unrecognized and result in continued glenohumeral instability.

          Purpose:

          To compare patients with anterior shoulder instability from a large multicenter cohort with and without a diagnosis of a HAGL lesion and identify preoperative physical examination findings, patient-reported outcomes, imaging findings, and surgical management trends associated with HAGL lesions.

          Study Design:

          Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

          Methods:

          Patients with anterior glenohumeral instability who underwent surgical management between 2012 and 2020 at 11 orthopaedic centers were enrolled. Patients with HAGL lesions identified intraoperatively were compared with patients without HAGL lesions. Preoperative characteristics, physical examinations, imaging findings, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures were collected. The Student t test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, Fisher exact test, and chi-square test were used to compare groups.

          Results:

          A total of 21 HAGL lesions were identified in 915 (2.3%) patients; approximately one-third (28.6%) of all lesions were visualized intraoperatively but not identified on preoperative MRI. Baseline characteristics did not differ between study cohorts. Compared with non-HAGL patients, HAGL patients were less likely to have a Hill-Sachs lesion (54.7% vs 28.6%; P = .03) or an anterior labral tear (87.2% vs 66.7%; P = .01) on preoperative MRI and demonstrated increased external rotation when their affected arm was positioned at 90° of abduction (85° vs 90°; P = .03). Additionally, HAGL lesions were independently associated with an increased risk of undergoing an open stabilization surgery (odds ratio, 74.6 [95% CI, 25.2-221.1]; P < .001).

          Conclusion:

          Approximately one-third of HAGL lesions were missed on preoperative MRI. HAGL patients were less likely to exhibit preoperative imaging findings associated with anterior shoulder instability, such as Hill-Sachs lesions or anterior labral pathology. These patients underwent open procedures more frequently than patients without HAGL lesions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

          Established in 1987, the EuroQol Group initially comprised a network of international, multilingual and multidisciplinary researchers from seven centres in Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Nowadays, the Group comprises researchers from Canada, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Japan, New Zealand, Slovenia, Spain, the USA and Zimbabwe. The process of shared development and local experimentation resulted in EQ-5D, a generic measure of health status that provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value that can be used in the clinical and economic evaluation of health care and in population health surveys. Currently, EQ-5D is being widely used in different countries by clinical researchers in a variety of clinical areas. EQ-5D is also being used by eight out of the first 10 of the top 50 pharmaceutical companies listed in the annual report of Pharma Business (November/December 1999). Furthermore, EQ-5D is one of the handful of measures recommended for use in cost-effectiveness analyses by the Washington Panel on Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. EQ-5D has now been translated into most major languages with the EuroQol Group closely monitoring the process.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

            The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), patient self-report section. Patients with shoulder dysfunction (n = 63) completed the ASES, The University of Pennsylvania Shoulder Score, and the Short Form-36 during the initial evaluation, 24 to 72 hours after the initial visit, and after 3 to 4 weeks of physical therapy. The test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient[1-way random-effects], 0.84; 95% CI lower limit, 0.75) and internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, 0.86) values were acceptable. The standard error of the measure was 6.7 ASES points (90% CI, 11.0). Construct and discriminant validity was demonstrated. Responsiveness was demonstrated with a standardized response mean of 1.5 and an effect size of 1.4. The minimal detectable change was 9.7 ASES points (90% CI, 16), and the minimal clinically important difference was 6.4 ASES points. The results indicate that the ASES is a reliable, valid, and responsive outcome tool.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life

              The RAND-36 is perhaps the most widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) survey instrument in the world today. It is comprised of 36 items that assess eight health concepts: physical functioning, role limitations caused by physical health problems, role limitations caused by emotional problems, social functioning, emotional well-being, energy/fatigue, pain, and general health perceptions. Physical and mental health summary scores are also derived from the eight RAND-36 scales. This paper provides example applications of the RAND-36 cross-sectionally and longitudinally, provides information on what a clinically important difference is for the RAND-36 scales, and provides guidance for summarizing the RAND-36 in a single number. The paper also discusses the availability of the RAND-36 in multiple languages and summarizes changes that are incorporated in the latest version of the survey.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Orthop J Sports Med
                Orthop J Sports Med
                OJS
                spojs
                Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2325-9671
                27 October 2023
                October 2023
                : 11
                : 10
                : 23259671231206757
                Affiliations
                [1-23259671231206757]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
                [2-23259671231206757]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
                [3-23259671231206757]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
                [4-23259671231206757]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
                [5-23259671231206757]University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
                [6-23259671231206757]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [7-23259671231206757]Fondren Orthopedic Group, Houston, Texas, USA
                [8-23259671231206757]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
                [9-23259671231206757]Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
                [10-23259671231206757]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
                [11-23259671231206757]Orthopedic Institute of Sioux Falls, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA
                [12-23259671231206757]The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
                [13-23259671231206757]University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
                [14-23259671231206757]Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
                [15-23259671231206757]University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
                [16-23259671231206757]Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
                [17-23259671231206757]The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
                [18-23259671231206757]MedSport, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [19-23259671231206757]University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
                [20-23259671231206757]The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
                [21-23259671231206757]Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
                [22-23259671231206757]University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
                [23-23259671231206757]Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
                [24-23259671231206757]University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
                [25-23259671231206757]MedSport, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
                [26-23259671231206757]University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
                [27-23259671231206757]Washington University, St Louis, Missouri, USA
                [28-23259671231206757]Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
                [29-23259671231206757]Investigation performed at the University of California–San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Ryan D. Freshman, MD, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California–San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Avenue, MU W320, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA (email: rfreshman92@ 123456gmail.com ).
                Article
                10.1177_23259671231206757
                10.1177/23259671231206757
                10612462
                37900861
                d1c88b5a-e500-4f65-86f3-ba13cfff9652
                © The Author(s) 2023

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 3 May 2023
                : 19 May 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000002;
                Award ID: U54TR001356
                Funded by: Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation, FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100001279;
                Categories
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                October 2023
                ts1

                humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament,magnetic resonance imaging,risk factors,shoulder instability

                Comments

                Comment on this article