10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Impacts of the Coronavirus on the Economy of the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We present a formal analysis of the macroeconomic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in the U.S., China and the rest of the world. Given the uncertainty regarding the severity and time-path of the infections and related conditions, we examine three scenarios, ranging from a relatively moderate event to a disaster. The study considers a comprehensive list of causal factors affecting the impacts, including: mandatory closures and the gradual re-opening process; decline in workforce due to morbidity, mortality and avoidance behavior; increased demand for health care; decreased demand for public transportation and leisure activities; potential resilience through telework; increased demand for communication services; and increased pent-up demand. We apply a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, a state-of-the-art economy-wide modeling technique. It traces the broader economic ramifications of individual responses of producers and consumers through supply chains both within and across countries. We project that the net U.S. GDP losses from COVID-19 would range from $3.2 trillion (14.8%) to $4.8 trillion (23.0%) in a 2-year period for the three scenarios. U.S. impacts are estimated to be higher than those for China and the ROW in percentage terms. The major factor affecting the results in all three scenarios is the combination of Mandatory Closures and Partial Reopenings of businesses. These alone would have resulted in a 22.3% to 60.6% decrease in U.S. GDP across the scenarios. Pent-up Demand, generated from the inability to spend during the Closures/Reopenings, is the second most influential factor, significantly offsetting the overall negative impacts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Standard GTAP Model, version 7

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Effects on the U.S. of an H1N1 Epidemic: Analysis with a Quarterly CGE Model

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              US Trade Actions Against China: A Supply Chain Perspective

              In 2018, the United States (US) Administration initiated several trade actions, including tariffs on China for unfair trade practices outlined by the US Trade Representative (USTR). In response, China filed requests for consultations with the World Trade Organization (WTO) and has implemented or threatened to implement increased tariffs on US products. In this article, the implications of current and potential US trade actions and responses by China on the US and global economy are estimated. We employ a dynamic supply chain model based on the widely used Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) Data Base and model. Our analysis finds that US gross domestic product (GDP) would be reduced by a projected –0.86 per cent in 2030 (or US$227.8 billion in 2017 dollars), as the role of the USA in global supply chains declines significantly. China’s GDP would also decline considerably by 2.84 per cent as a result of the actions imposed against it, while the rest of the world gain, as they fill the gaps left by US and Chinese producers. JEL: F16, C68
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                adam.rose@usc.edu
                Journal
                Econ Disaster Clim Chang
                Econ Disaster Clim Chang
                Economics of Disasters and Climate Change
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2511-1280
                2511-1299
                10 December 2020
                : 1-52
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.42505.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2156 6853, Department of Economics, Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences and Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE), , University of Southern California (USC), ; Los Angeles, CA USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.42505.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2156 6853, CREATE, Sol Price School of Public Policy, Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, , USC, ; Los Angeles, CA USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.42505.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2156 6853, CREATE, Sol Price School of Public Policy, , USC, ; Los Angeles, CA USA
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9748-7844
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3347-7684
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0738-2286
                Article
                80
                10.1007/s41885-020-00080-1
                7725664
                33319165
                d1dcbf10-9be6-4b2f-addb-fa7fda46a3a3
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 5 September 2020
                : 6 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: US Department of Homeland Security
                Award ID: 17STQAC00001-03-00
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Original Paper

                covid-19,macroeconomic impacts,telework,healthcare costs,avoidance behavior,pent-up demand,e65,i15,c68

                Comments

                Comment on this article