4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prescription preferences of antiepileptic drugs in brain tumor patients: An international survey among EANO members

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This study aimed at investigating antiepileptic drug (AED) prescription preferences in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) among the European neuro-oncology community, the considerations that play a role when initiating AED treatment, the organization of care, and practices with regard to AED withdrawal.

          Methods

          A digital survey containing 31 questions about prescription preferences of AEDs was set out among members of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO).

          Results

          A total of 198 respondents treating patients with BTRE participated of whom 179 completed the entire survey. Levetiracetam was the first choice in patients with BTRE for almost all respondents (90% [162/181]). Levetiracetam was considered the most effective AED in reducing seizure frequency (72% [131/181]) and having the least adverse effects (48% [87/181]). Common alternatives for levetiracetam as equivalent first choice included lacosamide (33% [59/181]), lamotrigine (22% [40/181]), and valproic acid (21% [38/181]). Most crucial factors to choose a specific AED were potential adverse effects (82% [148/181]) and interactions with antitumor treatments (76% [137/181]). In the majority of patients, neuro-oncologists were involved in the treatment of seizures (73% [132/181])). Other relevant findings were that a minority of respondents ever prescribe AEDs in brain tumor patients without epilepsy solely as prophylaxis (29% [53/181]), but a majority routinely considers complete AED withdrawal in BTRE patients who are seizure-free after antitumor treatment (79% [141/179]).

          Conclusions

          Our results show that among European professionals treating patients with BTRE levetiracetam is considered the first choice AED, with the presumed highest efficacy and least adverse effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice

          The principles of shared decision making are well documented but there is a lack of guidance about how to accomplish the approach in routine clinical practice. Our aim here is to translate existing conceptual descriptions into a three-step model that is practical, easy to remember, and can act as a guide to skill development. Achieving shared decision making depends on building a good relationship in the clinical encounter so that information is shared and patients are supported to deliberate and express their preferences and views during the decision making process. To accomplish these tasks, we propose a model of how to do shared decision making that is based on choice, option and decision talk. The model has three steps: a) introducing choice, b) describing options, often by integrating the use of patient decision support, and c) helping patients explore preferences and make decisions. This model rests on supporting a process of deliberation, and on understanding that decisions should be influenced by exploring and respecting “what matters most” to patients as individuals, and that this exploration in turn depends on them developing informed preferences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood

            In response to major changes in diagnostic algorithms and the publication of mature results from various large clinical trials, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) recognized the need to provide updated guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult patients with diffuse gliomas. Through these evidence-based guidelines, a task force of EANO provides recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of adult patients with diffuse gliomas. The diagnostic component is based on the 2016 update of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System and the subsequent recommendations of the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumour Taxonomy — Not Officially WHO (cIMPACT-NOW). With regard to therapy, we formulated recommendations based on the results from the latest practice-changing clinical trials and also provide guidance for neuropathological and neuroradiological assessment. In these guidelines, we define the role of the major treatment modalities of surgery, radiotherapy and systemic pharmacotherapy, covering current advances and cognizant that unnecessary interventions and expenses should be avoided. This document is intended to be a source of reference for professionals involved in the management of adult patients with diffuse gliomas, for patients and caregivers, and for health-care providers.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              EANO guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anaplastic gliomas and glioblastoma.

              This guideline provides recommendations for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for patients with malignant gliomas. We differentiate evidence-based standards from reasonable options or non-evidence-based measures that should no longer be considered. The recommendations herein should provide a framework and assurance for the choice of diagnostic procedures and therapeutic measures and aim to reduce complications from unnecessary treatment and cost. The guideline contributes to a critical appreciation of concurrent drugs with a focus on the controlled use of anticonvulsants and steroids. It should serve as a guideline for all professionals involved in the diagnostics and care of glioma patients and also as a source of knowledge for insurance companies and other institutions involved in the cost regulation of cancer care in Europe. Implementation of the recommendations summarised here will need interdisciplinary structures of care for patients with brain tumours and structured processes of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neurooncol Pract
                Neurooncol Pract
                nop
                Neuro-Oncology Practice
                Oxford University Press (US )
                2054-2577
                2054-2585
                April 2022
                21 October 2021
                21 October 2021
                : 9
                : 2
                : 105-113
                Affiliations
                Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, the Netherlands
                Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, the Netherlands
                Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center , The Hague, the Netherlands
                Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute , Rotterdam, the Netherlands
                Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, the Netherlands
                Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center , The Hague, the Netherlands
                Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto Hospital , Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
                Department of Neuro-Oncology, City of Health and Science and University of Turin , Turin, Italy
                Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, the Netherlands
                Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center , The Hague, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Pim B. van der Meer, BSc, Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands ( pbvandermeer@ 123456lumc.nl ).
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3700-8906
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9157-9895
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-5127
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3541-2315
                Article
                npab059
                10.1093/nop/npab059
                8965049
                35371521
                d2377006-2dcb-4778-a666-abb3d133fed3
                © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 14 November 2021
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Categories
                Original Articles
                AcademicSubjects/MED00300
                AcademicSubjects/MED00310

                antiepileptic drug,brain neoplasms,levetiracetam,seizures,valproic acid

                Comments

                Comment on this article