54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiscale assessment of treatment efficacy in adults with ADHD: A randomized placebo-controlled, multi-centre study with extended-release methylphenidate

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          This trial was performed to test the efficacy and safety of an extended-release formulation of methylphenidate (MPH ER).

          Methods

          A total of 162 adults with ADHD according to DSM-IV were treated for 8 weeks with either two daily individually body weight-adjusted doses of MPH ER up to 1 mg/kg per day ( N = 84) or placebo ( N = 78). The primary efficacy outcome was the Wender-Reimherr Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (WRAADDS) 8 weeks after randomization. Secondary efficacy measures were the ADHD Diagnostic Checklist (ADHD-DC), the Conners Adult Attention Deficit Disorder Scale (CAARS-S:L), the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS).

          Results

          At week 8 a significantly higher decline of the total WRAADDS score was found in the MPH ER group as compared to the placebo group ( P = 0.0003). The rates of responders were 50% in the MPH ER and 18% in the placebo group ( P < 0.0001). Furthermore, similar effects were observed for the secondary efficacy variable: ADHD-DC score ( P = 0.004), CAARS-S:L score ( P = 0.008) and the SDS score ( P = 0.017). 50% of the MPH ER group and 24.4% of the placebo group were improved “much” or “very much” according to the CGI rating ( P = 0.0001). MPH ER treatment was well tolerated. At week 2 also the mean heart rate was significantly higher in the MPH ER group as compared to the placebo group ( P = 0.01). No differences between the study groups were observed regarding mean blood pressure at any visit.

          Conclusions

          This clinical trial demonstrated statistically significant and clinical relevant effects of MPH ER in adults with ADHD for several self- and investigator-rated ADHD psychopathology and also functional efficacy measures.

          Related collections

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Assessing treatment effects in clinical trials with the discan metric of the Sheehan Disability Scale.

          The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) is a patient-rated, discretized analog measure of functional disability in work, social, and family life. Its increasing use in clinical trials in psychiatry suggests a need to assess its responsiveness and interpretability. In this paper we identify and review studies in which the SDS was used as a treatment outcome measure. Our objectives are (i) to evaluate the sensitivity of the SDS to treatment effects and (ii) to examine potential thresholds or cutoff scores for remission and response. Studies for the review were retrieved from the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database (1966 to 21 March 2007) and other sources. All studies had to use the SDS, be double-blind, controlled or large open-label trials in English. Studies assessing nonpharmacological treatments, long-term trials (>12 weeks), small n trials (less than 20 patients per treatment arm) and trials for conditions other than one of the anxiety disorders, depression, or premenstrual dysphoric disorder were excluded. Extracted data included the diagnostic target of treatment, n, study design, and method of analysis. Initial, endpoint and/or mean change scores were extracted from tables, text, or extrapolated from figures. In all, 37 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were retrieved and reviewed. All of the studies treated the SDS as a numeric scale and analyzed mean change or endpoint differences with parametric statistics. Three provided additional outcome data using nonparametric response or remission criteria. Overall, the SDS performed well in discriminating between active and inactive treatments. The results indicate that the SDS is sensitive to treatment effects. To establish reliable and valid cutoff scores for remission and response, there is a need to supplement parametric analyses using mean change and endpoint differences with nonparametric analyses showing the percentage meeting specified response and remission criteria. In addition, the percentages with endpoint scores of zero should be reported.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            THE BEHAVIOR OF CHILDREN RECEIVING BENZEDRINE

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              [Wender Utah rating scale. The short-version for the assessment of the attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults].

              This work presents a statistical analysis of the German version of the Wender Utah rating scale (WURS) for the retrospective diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. Data were obtained from 703 subjects. Item selection according to item-total correlation scores, frequency, and plausibility led to a short version of the scale that includes 21 items with item-total correlations from 0.19 to 0.61. Retest reliability of the WURS-k was r=0.9.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                World J Biol Psychiatry
                swbp
                The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry
                Informa Healthcare
                1562-2975
                1814-1412
                January 2012
                14 December 2010
                : 13
                : 1
                : 48-59
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Neurocentre, Saarland University Hospital, University of the Saarland, Homburg, Germany
                [2 ]Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Essen, Essen, Germany
                [3 ]Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
                [5 ]Medice, Arzneimittel Pütter GmbH & Co. KG, Iserlohn, Germany
                Author notes
                [*]

                The following clinicians and research staff participated in this clinical trial: B. Alm (Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim), M.A. Edel (LWL Clinic Bochum, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Preventive-Medicine, University Bochum), J. Fuhr (Bad Wildungen), H. Goossens-Merkt (Hamburg), P. Greven (Berlin), J. Hein (Charité-University Medicine Berlin), M. Huss (Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz), V.-F. Mautner (University-Hospital, Hamburg-Eppendorf), K.-U Oehler (Würzburg), A. Philipsen (Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Freiburg), W. Retz and M. Rösler (Neurocenter, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar), T. Wirth (Ludwigsburg).

                Correspondence: Wolfgang Retz, MD, Neurocentre – Saarland University Hospital Bdg. 90.3, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany. Tel: +49 6841 1626350. Fax: +49 6841 1626335. E-mail: wolfgang.retz@ 123456uks.eu
                Article
                10.3109/15622975.2010.540257
                3279134
                21155632
                d270f1d5-b271-4dd0-a7d9-e4ba4a40180d
                © 2012 Informa Healthcare

                This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Informa Healthcare journals , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 16 August 2010
                : 11 November 2010
                Categories
                Original Investigation

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                adult adhd,stimulants,treatment,randomized clinical trial,methylphenidate

                Comments

                Comment on this article