16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Young Children’s Exposure to Phenols in the Home: Associations between house dust, hand wipes, silicone wristbands, and urinary biomarkers

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Environmental phenols, such as parabens, bisphenol A, and triclosan, are ubiquitous in indoor environments because of their use in packaging, plastics, personal care products, and as anti-microbials. The primary pathways of exposure, as well as habits and behaviors that may lead to greater exposure, are still unclear.

          Objectives:

          Herein, we investigate the relationships between phenols found in residential environments by comparing levels in paired samples of house dust and hand wipes with children’s urine. In addition, phenols were analyzed in a novel exposure tool, the silicone wristband to investigate which external matrix best correlates with individual exposure based on urinary phenol biomarkers.

          Methods:

          Children aged 3–6 years in central North Carolina, United States, provided paired hand wipe (n = 202), wristband (n = 76), and three spot urine samples that were pooled (n=180), while legal guardians completed questionnaires on habits and behaviors. House dust samples (n = 186) were collected from the main living area during home visits completed between 2014–2016.

          Results:

          Environmental phenols were detected frequently in all matrices investigated. Ethyl, methyl, and propylparaben levels observed in hand wipes, dust, and on wristbands were significantly correlated to their associated urinary biomarkers. In addition, intra-paraben correlations were noted, with biomarkers of ethyl, methyl, and propylparabens generally positively and significantly correlated, suggesting co-application of parabens in products. Triclosan levels in dust were positive and significantly correlated with levels in hand wipes and wristbands and with urinary concentrations, suggesting non-personal care product sources may be important in children’s overall triclosan exposure. Generally, chemicals on wristbands were more highly correlated with urinary biomarkers than with chemicals in hand wipes or house dust. In addition, more frequent lotion use was positively associated with urinary concentrations of paraben biomarkers.

          Conclusions:

          Our results suggest that the home environment is an important source of exposure which has been under-investigated for some environmental phenols (e.g. triclosan in house dust). Associations between wristbands and biomarkers of exposure, which were stronger than for hand wipes and house dust, suggest that silicone wristbands may provide a suitable exposure assessment tool for some phenols.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          7807270
          22115
          Environ Int
          Environ Int
          Environment international
          0160-4120
          1873-6750
          24 December 2020
          17 December 2020
          February 2021
          03 February 2021
          : 147
          : 106317
          Affiliations
          [a ]Nicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
          [b ]Children’s Health Discovery Initiative, Duke School of Medicine, North Carolina, United States
          [c ]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
          [d ]Boston University School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
          Author notes
          [†]

          Posthumous Authorship:

          Dr. Xiaoyun Ye is included posthumously as an author for her work on the quantification of phenols biomarkers.

          Author contributions: HMS, TFW, KH conceptualized study and planned for sample collections; SCH, ALP and KH helped collect the samples; SCM, ALP, and SZ performed all sample extraction and analytical measurements of abiotic samples; XY and AMC performed all sample extraction and analytical measurements of urine samples; JLL, SCH, and KH, performed statistical analyses, JLL, SCH, KH and HMS wrote the manuscript and all authors provided feedback and edits.

          [# ] Corresponding Author: Heather M. Stapleton, Ph.D., Duke University, Nicholas School of the Environment, 9 Circuit Drive, Box 90328, Durham, NC 27708, Phone: 919-613-8717, heather.stapleton@ 123456duke.edu
          Article
          PMC7856225 PMC7856225 7856225 nihpa1653503
          10.1016/j.envint.2020.106317
          7856225
          33341585
          d2d3009c-88ca-4a58-b471-667975cdb5ab
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article