36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sociohydrology: Scientific Challenges in Addressing the Sustainable Development Goals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations Agenda 2030 represent an ambitious blueprint to reduce inequalities globally and achieve a sustainable future for all mankind. Meeting the SDGs for water requires an integrated approach to managing and allocating water resources, by involving all actors and stakeholders, and considering how water resources link different sectors of society. To date, water management practice is dominated by technocratic, scenario‐based approaches that may work well in the short term but can result in unintended consequences in the long term due to limited accounting of dynamic feedbacks between the natural, technical, and social dimensions of human‐water systems. The discipline of sociohydrology has an important role to play in informing policy by developing a generalizable understanding of phenomena that arise from interactions between water and human systems. To explain these phenomena, sociohydrology must address several scientific challenges to strengthen the field and broaden its scope. These include engagement with social scientists to accommodate social heterogeneity, power relations, trust, cultural beliefs, and cognitive biases, which strongly influence the way in which people alter, and adapt to, changing hydrological regimes. It also requires development of new methods to formulate and test alternative hypotheses for the explanation of emergent phenomena generated by feedbacks between water and society. Advancing sociohydrology in these ways therefore represents a major contribution toward meeting the targets set by the SDGs, the societal grand challenge of our time.

          Key Points

          • The crises that humanity faces over access to a clean water supply are increasingly connected and are growing in complexity

          • Sociohydrology researchers must address several scientific challenges to strengthen basic knowledge and broaden the range of solvable problems

          • Advances in sociohydrology research are progress toward meeting the targets defined by the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals

          Related collections

          Most cited references210

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.

          A major problem worldwide is the potential loss of fisheries, forests, and water resources. Understanding of the processes that lead to improvements in or deterioration of natural resources is limited, because scientific disciplines use different concepts and languages to describe and explain complex social-ecological systems (SESs). Without a common framework to organize findings, isolated knowledge does not cumulate. Until recently, accepted theory has assumed that resource users will never self-organize to maintain their resources and that governments must impose solutions. Research in multiple disciplines, however, has found that some government policies accelerate resource destruction, whereas some resource users have invested their time and energy to achieve sustainability. A general framework is used to identify 10 subsystem variables that affect the likelihood of self-organization in efforts to achieve a sustainable SES.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                giuliano.dibaldassarre@geo.uu.se
                Journal
                Water Resour Res
                Water Resour Res
                10.1002/(ISSN)1944-7973
                WRCR
                Water Resources Research
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0043-1397
                1944-7973
                16 August 2019
                August 2019
                : 55
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/wrcr.v55.8 )
                : 6327-6355
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Earth Sciences Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden
                [ 2 ] Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science, CNDS Uppsala Sweden
                [ 3 ] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science University of Illinois at Urbana‐Champaign Urbana IL USA
                [ 5 ] Agrocampus Ouest, INRA, UMR SAS Rennes France
                [ 6 ] School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment Arizona State University Tempe AZ USA
                [ 7 ] GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam Germany
                [ 8 ] Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Delft University of Technology Delft The Netherlands
                [ 9 ] Department of Water Management Delft University of Technology The Netherlands
                [ 10 ] Department of Hydraulic Engineering Tsinghua University Beijing China
                [ 11 ] Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management Vienna University of Technology Austria
                [ 12 ] Department of Environment Land and Infrastructure Engineering (DIATI), Politecnico di Torino Turin Italy
                [ 13 ] School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
                [ 14 ] Lyles School of Civil Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA
                [ 15 ] Department of Political Science Purdue University West Lafayette IN USA
                [ 16 ] Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment Bangalore India
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: G. Di Baldassarre,

                giuliano.dibaldassarre@ 123456geo.uu.se

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8180-4996
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3004-3530
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-3213
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1707-8926
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2864-2377
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6274-3625
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0540-8438
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4364-4119
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8789-7628
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-3185
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5946-6556
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9414-7019
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7587-4832
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4266-4433
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-1933
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-3116
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-8225
                Article
                WRCR24091 2018WR023901
                10.1029/2018WR023901
                7388443
                32742038
                d2f48020-0096-45fb-93bb-0afa6ef857ed
                ©2019. The Authors.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 January 2019
                : 20 June 2019
                : 02 July 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 1, Pages: 29, Words: 14201
                Funding
                Funded by: EC | H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (ERC) , open-funder-registry 10.13039/100010663;
                Funded by: Austrian Science Funds (FWF)
                Award ID: I3174
                Award ID: W1219‐N22
                Funded by: European Research Council (ERC) , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100000781;
                Award ID: 771678
                Categories
                Grand Challenges in the Earth and Space Sciences
                Hydrology
                Water Management
                Human Impacts
                Debris Flow and Landslides
                Drought
                Floods
                Natural Hazards
                Human Impact
                Hydrological
                Sustainable Development
                Resilience
                Policy Sciences
                Regional Planning
                Feature Article
                Feature Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.6 mode:remove_FC converted:29.07.2020

                sustainable development goals,water crises,sociohydrology,legacy effects,precautionary principle

                Comments

                Comment on this article