0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Transporters in Drug Development: International Transporter Consortium Update on Emerging Transporters of Clinical Importance.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          During its fourth transporter workshop in 2021, the International Transporter Consortium (ITC) provided updates on emerging clinically relevant transporters for drug development. Previously highlighted and new transporters were considered based on up-to-date clinical evidence of their importance in drug-drug interactions and potential for altered drug efficacy and safety, including drug-nutrient interactions leading to nutrient deficiencies. For the first time, folate transport pathways (PCFT, RFC, and FRα) were examined in-depth as a potential mechanism of drug-induced folate deficiency and related toxicities (e.g., neural tube defects and megaloblastic anemia). However, routine toxicology studies conducted in support of drug development appear sufficient to flag such folate deficiency toxicities, whereas prospective prediction from in vitro folate metabolism and transport inhibition is not well enough established to inform drug development. Previous suggestion of a retrospective study of intestinal OATP2B1 inhibition to explain unexpected decreases in drug exposure were updated. Furthermore, when the absorption of a new molecular entity is more rapid and extensive than can be explained by passive permeability, evaluation of the OATP2B1 transport may be considered. Emerging research on hepatic and renal OAT2 is summarized, but current understanding of the importance of OAT2 was deemed insufficient to justify specific consideration for drug development. Hepatic, renal, and intestinal MRPs (MRP2, MRP3, and MRP4) were revisited. MRPs may be considered when they are suspected to be the major determinant of drug disposition (e.g., direct glucuronide conjugates); MRP2 inhibition as a mechanistic explanation for drug-induced hyperbilirubinemia remains justified. There were no major changes in recommendations from previous ITC whitepapers.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Clin Pharmacol Ther
          Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
          Wiley
          1532-6535
          0009-9236
          September 2022
          : 112
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Drug Metabolism and PK, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
          [2 ] Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toronto, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
          [3 ] Drug Metabolism and PK, Bristol Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
          [4 ] Drug Metabolism and PK, Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
          [5 ] Roche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
          [6 ] PK, Dynamics and Metabolism, Medicine Design, Worldwide R&D, Pfizer Inc., Groton, Connecticut, USA.
          [7 ] Drug Metabolism, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, California, USA.
          [8 ] Laboratory of Quantitative System PK/Pharmacodynamics, School of Pharmacy, Kioicho Campus, Josai International University, Tokyo, Japan.
          [9 ] Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
          Article
          10.1002/cpt.2644
          35561119
          d386356e-439e-4c73-b4af-0f8a21da807c
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article