25
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Understanding Cultivar-Specificity and Soil Determinants of the Cannabis Microbiome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Understanding microbial partnerships with the medicinally and economically important crop Cannabis has the potential to affect agricultural practice by improving plant fitness and production yield. Furthermore, Cannabis presents an interesting model to explore plant-microbiome interactions as it produces numerous secondary metabolic compounds. Here we present the first description of the endorhiza-, rhizosphere-, and bulk soil-associated microbiome of five distinct Cannabis cultivars. Bacterial communities of the endorhiza showed significant cultivar-specificity. When controlling cultivar and soil type the microbial community structure was significantly different between plant cultivars, soil types, and between the endorhiza, rhizosphere and soil. The influence of soil type, plant cultivar and sample type differentiation on the microbial community structure provides support for a previously published two-tier selection model, whereby community composition across sample types is determined mainly by soil type, while community structure within endorhiza samples is determined mainly by host cultivar.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Microbial diversity in soil: selection microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness.

          An increasing interest has emerged with respect to the importance of microbial diversity in soil habitats. The extent of the diversity of microorganisms in soil is seen to be critical to the maintenance of soil health and quality, as a wide range of microorganisms is involved in important soil functions. This review focuses on recent data relating how plant type, soil type, and soil management regime affect the microbial diversity of soil and the implication for the soil's disease suppressiveness. The two main drivers of soil microbial community structure, i.e., plant type and soil type, are thought to exert their function in a complex manner. We propose that the fact that in some situations the soil and in others the plant type is the key factor determining soil microbial diversity is related to the complexity of the microbial interactions in soil, including interactions between microorganisms and soil and microorganisms and plants. A conceptual framework, based on the relative strengths of the shaping forces exerted by plant and soil versus the ecological behavior of microorganisms, is proposed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and bacteria: a network of interactions.

            This review focuses on interactions among plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and bacteria, testing the hypothesis whether mycorrhizas can be defined as tripartite associations. After summarizing the main biological features of mycorrhizas, we illustrate the different types of interaction occurring between mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria, from loosely associated microbes to endobacteria. We then discuss, in the context of nutritional strategies, the mechanisms that operate among members of the consortium and that often promote plant growth. Release of active molecules, including volatiles, and physical contact among the partners seem important for the establishment of the bacteria/mycorrhizal fungus/plant network. The potential involvement of quorum sensing and Type III secretion systems is discussed, even if the exact nature of the complex interspecies/interphylum interactions remains unclear.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Engineered endophytic bacteria improve phytoremediation of water-soluble, volatile, organic pollutants.

              Phytoremediation of highly water soluble and volatile organic xenobiotics is often inefficient because plants do not completely degrade these compounds through their rhizospheres. This results in phytotoxicity and/or volatilization of chemicals through the leaves, which can cause additional environmental problems. We demonstrate that endophytic bacteria equipped with the appropriate degradation pathway improve the in planta degradation of toluene. We introduced the pTOM toluene-degradation plasmid of Burkholderia cepacia G4 into B. cepacia L.S.2.4, a natural endophyte of yellow lupine. After surface-sterilized lupine seeds were successfully inoculated with the recombinant strain, the engineered endophytic bacteria strongly degraded toluene, resulting in a marked decrease in its phytotoxicity, and a 50-70% reduction of its evapotranspiration through the leaves. This strategy promises to improve the efficiency of phytoremediating volatile organic contaminants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                16 June 2014
                : 9
                : 6
                : e99641
                Affiliations
                [1 ]The Field Museum, Department of Science and Education, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
                [2 ]Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
                [3 ]Argonne National Laboratory, Institute for Genomic and Systems Biology, Lemont, Illinois, United States of America
                [4 ]Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
                [5 ]Basque Country Government, Bilbao, Spain
                [6 ]Computation Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
                [7 ]Cannavest, San Diego, California, United States of America
                [8 ]MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, California, United States of America
                [9 ]Graduate Program in Biophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
                Graz University of Technology (TU Graz), Austria
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: Despite the fact that authors Josh Hartsel and Suzanne Kennedy work for commercial companies Cannavest and MO BIO Laboratories, respectively, this does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: MEW JAG SJK SMG. Performed the experiments: JHM IZ SMO JH SJK. Analyzed the data: MEW SMG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JAG SJK JH. Wrote the paper: MEW JAG CSM SMG.

                Article
                PONE-D-14-01007
                10.1371/journal.pone.0099641
                4059704
                24932479
                d51fe6c2-b2fe-4ee8-aa0e-82bdc98e1c97
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 8 January 2014
                : 17 May 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 11
                Funding
                This work was supported in part by the U.S. Dept. of Energy under Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. MEW was supported by a U.S. Department of Education GAANN grant. Funding for SMG was provided U.S. Environmental Protection Agency STAR Graduate Fellowship. Computational resources were funded by a Amazon Web Services education grant. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Crops
                Cell Biology
                Plant Cell Biology
                Ecology
                Plant Ecology
                Plant-Environment Interactions
                Microbial Ecology
                Genetics
                Genomics
                Metagenomics
                Microbiology
                Plant Microbiology
                Plant Science
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article