9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Psychometric Properties of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale in University Students of Health Sciences

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Communication is one of the determining factors of healthcare quality; however, a health model that prioritizes clinical over non-technical skills remains prevalent. The aims of this article were: (a) to validate a communication skills scale in a sample of fourth-year nursing degree students from two Spanish universities and (b) determine their perception of communication skills. The study included 289 fourth-year nursing undergraduate students with a mean age of 22.7 ( SD = 4.87) years; 81.7% were female. The Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale (HP-CSS) questionnaire was adapted for use among nursing students. We analysed the psychometric properties and relationships with the variable attitudes toward communication skills. The HP-CSS showed a high internal consistency (0.88) and good fit of data to the model ( TLI = 0.98; CFI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.05 [95% CI = 0.04–0.06]). The total score and subscale scores correlated with the variable attitude towards communication skills. High scores were obtained for the students’ perception of communication skills. The HP-CSS is a valid and reliable tool to assess the communication skills in nursing students. This scale provides university teachers with a rapid and easily applied instrument to assess the level of communication skills and relationship with patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The theory of planned behavior

            Icek Ajzen (1991)
            Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

              Purpose The original COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist was developed to assess the methodological quality of single studies on measurement properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Now it is our aim to adapt the COSMIN checklist and its four-point rating system into a version exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs, aiming to assess risk of bias of studies on measurement properties. Methods For each standard (i.e., a design requirement or preferred statistical method), it was discussed within the COSMIN steering committee if and how it should be adapted. The adapted checklist was pilot-tested to strengthen content validity in a systematic review on the quality of PROMs for patients with hand osteoarthritis. Results Most important changes were the reordering of the measurement properties to be assessed in a systematic review of PROMs; the deletion of standards that concerned reporting issues and standards that not necessarily lead to biased results; the integration of standards on general requirements for studies on item response theory with standards for specific measurement properties; the recommendation to the review team to specify hypotheses for construct validity and responsiveness in advance, and subsequently the removal of the standards about formulating hypotheses; and the change in the labels of the four-point rating system. Conclusions The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was developed exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs to distinguish this application from other purposes of assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties, such as guidance for designing or reporting a study on the measurement properties. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                18 October 2020
                October 2020
                : 17
                : 20
                : 7565
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante), Spain; rjulia@ 123456ua.es (R.J.-S.); silvia.escribano@ 123456ua.es (S.E.)
                [2 ]Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain; cleal@ 123456um.es
                [3 ]Department of Health Psychology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig (Alicante), Spain; mfernandeza@ 123456ua.es
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: mariajose.cabanero@ 123456ua.es ; Tel.: +34-965-903-400 (ext. 2102)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-282X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7711-3877
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3481-8156
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7943-3591
                Article
                ijerph-17-07565
                10.3390/ijerph17207565
                7589042
                33080943
                d59dd1da-1e31-4c88-a2e2-deffed198bb1
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 09 September 2020
                : 15 October 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                health communication,nursing,psychometrics,scale,students,validation studies
                Public health
                health communication, nursing, psychometrics, scale, students, validation studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article