3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Caliceal Fluid Temperature During High-Power Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in an In Vivo Porcine Model

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p id="d6714932e258"> <b> <i>Introduction:</i> </b> With increasing use of high-power laser settings for lithotripsy, the potential exists to induce thermal tissue damage. <i>In vitro</i> studies have demonstrated that temperature elevation sufficient to cause thermal tissue damage can occur with certain laser and irrigation settings. The objective of this pilot study was to measure caliceal fluid temperature during high-power laser lithotripsy in an <i>in vivo</i> porcine model. </p><p id="d6714932e272"> <b> <i>Methods:</i> </b> Four female pigs (30–35 kg) were placed under general anesthesia and positioned supine. Retrograde ureteroscopy with entry into upper or middle calices was performed. Thermocouples were placed into the calix by open exposure and puncture of the kidney or retrograde alongside the ureteroscope. A 242 μm laser fiber was positioned in the center of the calix and activated (0.5 J, 80 Hz, 40 W) for 60 seconds with high, medium, or no irrigation delivered in each trial. Finite element simulations of laser-induced heating in a renal calix were also performed. </p><p id="d6714932e280"> <b> <i>Results:</i> </b> Peak temperatures of 84.8°C, 63.9°C, and 43.6°C were recorded for no, medium, and high irrigation, respectively. Mean time to reach threshold of thermal injury ( <i>t <sub>43</sub> </i> of 120 minutes) was 12.7 and 17.8 seconds for no and medium irrigation. Thermal damage thresholds were not reached in high-irrigation trials. Numerical simulations revealed similar results with peak spatial average fluid temperatures of &gt;100°C, 58.5°C, and 37.5°C during 60 seconds of laser activation for 0.1, 15, and 40 mL/minute irrigation, respectively. </p><p id="d6714932e294"> <b> <i>Conclusions:</i> </b> High-power holmium laser settings (40 W) can induce potentially injurious temperatures in the porcine <i>in vivo</i> model, particularly with slower irrigation rates. Characterization of thermal dose across a broader range of laser parameter settings is underway to map out the thermal safety envelope. </p>

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm.

          H H PENNES (1948)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation.

            New-generation flexible ureteroscopes allow the management of proximal ureteral and intrarenal pathology with high success rates, including complete removal of ureteral and renal calculi. One problem is that the irrigation pressures generated within the collecting system can be significantly elevated, as evidenced by pyelovenous and pyelolymphatic backflow seen during retrograde pyelography. We sought to determine if the ureteral access sheath (UAS) can offer protection from high intrarenal pressures attained during routine ureteroscopic stone surgery. Five patients (average age 72.6 years) evaluated in the emergency department for obstructing calculi underwent percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) tube placement to decompress their collecting systems. The indications for PCN tube placement were obstructive renal failure (N=1), urosepsis (N=2), and obstruction with uncontrolled pain and elevated white blood cell counts (N=2). Flexible ureteroscopy was subsequently performed with and without the aid of the UAS while pressures were measured via the nephrostomy tube connected to a pressure transducer. Pressures were recorded at baseline and in the distal, mid, and proximal ureter and renal pelvis, first without the UAS, and then with the UAS in place. The average baseline pressure within the collecting system was 13.6 mm Hg. The mean intrarenal pressure with the ureteroscope in the distal ureter without the UAS was 60 mm Hg and with the UAS was 15 mm Hg. With the ureteroscope in the midureter, the pressures were 65.6 and 17.5 mm Hg, respectively; with the ureteroscope in the proximal ureter 79.2 and 24 mm Hg, and with the ureteroscope in the renal pelvis 94.4 and 40.6 mm Hg, respectively. All differences at each location were statistically significant (P<0.008). Compared with baseline, all pressures measured without the UAS were significantly greater, but only pressures recorded in the proximal ureter and renal pelvis after UAS insertion were significantly higher (P<0.03). The irrigation pressures transmitted to the renal pelvis and subsequently to the parenchyma are significantly greater during routine URS without the use of the UAS. The access sheath is potentially protective against pyelovenous and pyelolymphatic backflow, with clinical implications for the ureteroscopic management of upper-tract transitional cell carcinoma, struvite stones, or calculi associated with urinary tract infection.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Contemporary Practice Patterns of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treating Renal Stones: Results of a Worldwide Survey.

              Flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) is increasingly used in the treatment of renal stones. However, wide variations exist in technique, use, and indications. To better inform our knowledge about the contemporary state of fURS for treating renal stones, we conducted a survey of endourologists worldwide.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal of Endourology
                Journal of Endourology
                Mary Ann Liebert Inc
                0892-7790
                1557-900X
                August 2018
                August 2018
                : 32
                : 8
                : 724-729
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
                [2 ]Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
                [3 ]Department of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
                [4 ]Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
                Article
                10.1089/end.2018.0395
                6096348
                29905092
                d5d526ed-3354-4a47-b518-2e133adc72bf
                © 2018

                https://www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article