6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Why do placentas evolve? An evaluation of the life-history facilitation hypothesis in the fish genus Poeciliopsis : Placental evolution in northern clade poeciliopsis

      , , , , ,
      Functional Ecology
      Wiley-Blackwell

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Impact of Predation on Life History Evolution in Trinidadian Guppies (Poecilia reticulata)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods.

              Most phylogenetically based statistical methods for the analysis of quantitative or continuously varying phenotypic traits assume that variation within species is absent or at least negligible, which is unrealistic for many traits. Within-species variation has several components. Differences among populations of the same species may represent either phylogenetic divergence or direct effects of environmental factors that differ among populations (phenotypic plasticity). Within-population variation also contributes to within-species variation and includes sampling variation, instrument-related error, low repeatability caused by fluctuations in behavioral or physiological state, variation related to age, sex, season, or time of day, and individual variation within such categories. Here we develop techniques for analyzing phylogenetically correlated data to include within-species variation, or "measurement error" as it is often termed in the statistical literature. We derive methods for (i) univariate analyses, including measurement of "phylogenetic signal," (ii) correlation and principal components analysis for multiple traits, (iii) multiple regression, and (iv) inference of "functional relations," such as reduced major axis (RMA) regression. The methods are capable of incorporating measurement error that differs for each data point (mean value for a species or population), but they can be modified for special cases in which less is known about measurement error (e.g., when one is willing to assume something about the ratio of measurement error in two traits). We show that failure to incorporate measurement error can lead to both biased and imprecise (unduly uncertain) parameter estimates. Even previous methods that are thought to account for measurement error, such as conventional RMA regression, can be improved by explicitly incorporating measurement error and phylogenetic correlation. We illustrate these methods with examples and simulations and provide Matlab programs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Functional Ecology
                Wiley-Blackwell
                02698463
                August 2011
                August 2011
                : 25
                : 4
                : 757-768
                Article
                10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01842.x
                d70312d9-c71e-4edb-b1e3-1b2d67c5eae8
                © 2011

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article