7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Relativized Minimality approach to A′-dependencies (Friedmann et al., 2009) predicts that headed object relative clauses (RCs) and which—questions are the most difficult, due to the presence of a lexical restriction on both the subject and the object DP which creates intervention. We investigated comprehension of center-embedded headed object RCs with Italian children, where Number and Gender feature values on subject and object DPs are manipulated. We found that, Number conditions are always more accurate than Gender ones, showing that intervention is sensitive to DP-internal structure. We propose a finer definition of the lexical restriction where external and syntactically active features (such as Number) reduce intervention whereas internal and (possibly) lexicalized features (such as Gender) do so to a lesser extent. Our results are also compatible with a memory interference approach in which the human parser is sensitive to highly specific properties of the linguistic input, such as the cue-based model (Van Dyke, 2007).

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interference effects from grammatically unavailable constituents during sentence processing.

          Evidence from 3 experiments reveals interference effects from structural relationships that are inconsistent with any grammatical parse of the perceived input. Processing disruption was observed when items occurring between a head and a dependent overlapped with either (or both) syntactic or semantic features of the dependent. Effects of syntactic interference occur in the earliest online measures in the region where the retrieval of a long-distance dependent occurs. Semantic interference effects occur in later online measures at the end of the sentence. Both effects endure in offline comprehension measures, suggesting that interfering items participate in incorrect interpretations that resist reanalysis. The data are discussed in terms of a cue-based retrieval account of parsing, which reconciles the fact that the parser must violate the grammar in order for these interference effects to occur. Broader implications of this research indicate a need for a precise specification of the interface between the parsing mechanism and the memory system that supports language comprehension.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Competence and processing in children's grammar of relative clauses.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lingua
                Lingua
                Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue Internationale De Linguistique Generale
                North Holland Publishing
                0024-3841
                September 2010
                September 2010
                : 120
                : 9-3
                : 2148-2166
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy
                [b ]Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA
                [c ]Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Germany
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknechtstr. 24, 14476 Potsdam, Germany. Tel.: +49 331 977 26 39; fax: +49 331 977 20 59. flavia.adani@ 123456uni-potsdam.de
                Article
                LINGUA1676
                10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.018
                2956846
                21151323
                d72721f2-a22e-4ac0-9e9c-b1a0a13a21df
                © 2010 Elsevier B.V.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 12 May 2009
                : 17 March 2010
                : 17 March 2010
                Categories
                Article

                General linguistics
                relative clause comprehension,italian acquisition,number,gender
                General linguistics
                relative clause comprehension, italian acquisition, number, gender

                Comments

                Comment on this article