19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Virtual Surgical Planning in Orthognathic Surgery

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          DESCRIPTION An 18-year-old woman presented for evaluation of her dental occlusion. She presented with “long face syndrome” with excessive midface height, excessive dental show in repose, and malocclusion with anterior open bite (Fig 1). She was scheduled for an impaction LeFort I osteotomy with bilateral sagittal split osteotomies. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) was utilized for operative planning (Figs 2 and 3). QUESTIONS What is VSP? What are the applications of VSP? What are the key stages of computer-assisted craniofacial surgery? What are the advantages and disadvantages of VSP? DISCUSSION Craniofacial surgery poses various challenges due to inconsistent 3-dimensional (3D) anatomy and inadequate imaging modalities. VSP and computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) software is increasingly being used in complex craniomaxillofacial reconstruction. Benefits include increased accuracy for orthognathic surgery, reduced operating room (OR) time, and increased patient satisfaction.1 Surgeons collaborate with biomedical engineers via a teleconference to plan the surgery preoperatively. With the use of CAD/CAM software, the team can make various measurements and changes to the patient's 3D craniofacial skeletal anatomy and account for yaw, pitch, and roll. Using CAD software, the resections and reconstruction are virtually planned using specific osteotomy locations with precision to the 1/100th of a millimeter.2 At this time, bones can also be precisely measured, moved, and grafted from other body locations. Using CAM software, the team can manufacture surgical splints, osteotomy cutting guides, and plate-bending templates via 3D printing that are used during the time of surgery. Applications of VSP include craniomaxillofacial reconstruction, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction, trauma, and oncological reconstruction, to name a few. In craniomaxillofacial surgery, VSP-CAD/CAM technology allows surgeons to virtually perform Le Fort and mandibular osteotomies for craniofacial anomalies and maxillofacial deficiencies. Here we can advance, rotate, and resect bone tissue. This technology has been used in TMJ reconstruction taking it from a 2-stage procedure to a single-stage procedure. In the past, gap arthroplasty was done in the first stage, followed by imaging to plan implant design, followed by a second procedure to inset the TMJ implant. VSP allows for single-stage reconstruction as gap arthroplasty and implant fabrication can be conducted virtually and the implant can be produced on the basis of simulated arthroplasty.1 In traumatic facial injuries, VSP helps facilitate intraoperative reduction and repair with exquisite precision. CAD/CAM also allows the production of occlusal splints to achieve accurate dental relationships and facial symmetry.3 In the field of oncology, reconstruction of the maxilla and mandible is often limited by the lack of preoperative information regarding recipient site, graft size, cancer margins, and resection size. VSP-CAD/CAM helps resolve these issues by conducting a whole-body 3D reconstruction and performing the cancer resections with fibula free-flap reconstruction virtually.4 Computer-assisted craniofacial surgery involves 4 key stages: planning, modeling, surgery, and evaluation.1 In the planning phase, a computed tomographic (CT) scan with 3D reconstruction of the patient is conducted and sent to the design company to be applied to its CAD software. The reconstructive surgeon has a Web teleconference with biomedical engineers and together they virtually plan and conduct the surgery by performing resections, osteotomies, moving bony tissue in specific vectors, and placing bone grafts as needed (Figs 2 and 3). In the modeling stage using CAM, stereolithographic models, cutting guides, and prebent plates are produced on the basis of the virtual surgical plan and shipped to the surgeon. The next stage is the surgical phase. Virtual surgery, templates, and prefabricated implants lead to decrease OR time, increased precision, and, in the case of free-flap reconstruction, lower flap ischemia time.5 Finally, in the evaluation phase, a CT scan with 3D reconstruction is performed and the CAD model is overlaid with the preoperative model to obtain an objective measurement of the outcome compared with the virtual surgical plan. Using VSP-CAD/CAM technology brings forth advantages including increased dental relationship accuracy, reduced OR time, increased patient satisfaction, and decrease cost.5 , 6 Simulating surgery preoperatively allows measurements to the 1/100th of a millimeter and when combined with 3D printed splints and customized prebent plates, the reconstructive and aesthetic outcome is superior to traditional 2-dimensional (2D) modeling and cephalometric tracing. Reduced OR time is realized with prefabricated splints, single-stage procedures (as seen in TMJ reconstruction), and having already simulated the surgery preoperatively. This decreased OR time also directly translates to reduced time under anesthesia and decreased overall cost. In 2012, using patient satisfaction surveys, subjective evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes were measured and compared with traditional surgery.6 Results showed that patients who underwent VSP reported more favorable scores than those who underwent traditional surgery. Finally, a study in 2016 showed that VSP is associated with decreased cost and OR time when compared with standard orthognathic surgery.5 The main disadvantage is adapting to new technology and changing the way earlier generation of surgeons perform orthognathic surgery. VSP-CAD/CAM technology is becoming the future of craniomaxillofacial surgery with a wide variety of applications. The benefits show that this technology is superior to traditional 2D cephalometric surgery with regard to outcome (Fig 4) and cost.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results.

          The concept of virtual surgery uses surgical simulation rather than relying exclusively on intraoperative manual approximation of facial reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the degree to which surgical outcomes in free fibula mandibular reconstructions planned with virtual surgery and carried out with prefabricated surgical plate templates and cutting guides correlated to the virtual surgical plan in a series of 11 patients. This retrospective study evaluated 11 consecutive patients (6 males and 5 females) with an average age of 50.73 years (range, 23-72 years) who required mandibular reconstruction for aggressive benign or malignant disease with a free fibula osseomyocutaneous flap at Emory University Hospital (Atlanta, GA) between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009. In each case, a high-resolution helical computed tomography (CT) scan of the maxillofacial region and mandible was obtained prior to surgery. The CT data was sent on a CD to a modeling company (Medical Modeling Inc, Golden, CO). The scans were then converted into 3-dimensional models of the maxillofacial skeleton utilizing both automatic and manual segmentation techniques in the SurgiCase CMF software (Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium). A virtual surgery planning session was held via a Web meeting between the surgeons and the modeling company, at which the resection planes of the mandible, positioning of the plate, and fibula lengths/osteotomy angles were established. The surgery was then carried out using prefabricated cutting guides and manual bending of a reconstruction plate using a prefabricated plate template. A postoperative CT scan of each patient was obtained within the first 7 postoperative days on the same scanner. Three-dimensional computer models of the final reconstruction were obtained for comparison with the preoperative virtual plan. To make the desired comparisons, the 3-dimensional objects representing the postoperative surgical outcome were superimposed onto the preoperative virtual plan using manual alignment techniques. These objects were then compared by 1-to-1 magnification for measurements of fibular bone volume, location of mandibular osteotomies, location of fibular osteotomies, plate contour, plate position on fibula, and plate position on mandible. Comparison was made between the virtual and final plates with regard to contour and position through superimposition overlays of the 3-dimensional models that are registered in the same coordinate system. A total of 19 mandibular osteotomies were carried out. The mean distance of the actual mandibular osteotomy when compared to the virtual mandibular osteotomy was 2.00 ± 1.12 mm. The mean volume determined by the software program of the 11 virtual fibulas was 13,669.45 ± 3,874.15 mm(3) (range, 9,568 to 22,860 mm(3)), and the mean volume of the 11 actual postoperative fibulas was 12,361.09 ± 4,161.80 mm(3) (range, 7,142 to 22,294 mm(3)). The mean percentage volumes of the actual postoperative fibula compared to the planned fibula were 90.93 ± 18.03%. A total of 22 fibular segments were involved in the study created by 44 separate fibula osteotomies. The mean distance of the actual fibula osteotomy when compared to the virtual fibula osteotomy was 1.30 ± 0.59 mm. The mean percentage overlap of the actual plate to the virtual plate was 58.73% ± 8.96%. Virtual surgical planning appears to have a positive impact on the reconstruction of major mandibular defects through the provision of accuracy difficult to achieve through manual placement of the graft, even in the hands of experienced surgeons. Although a reasonably high level of accuracy was achieved in the mandibular and fibula osteotomies through use of the surgical cutting guides, the limited ability to correctly contour the plate by hand to replicate the plate template is reflected in our findings. Copyright © 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluation of computer-assisted jaw reconstruction with free vascularized fibular flap compared to conventional surgery: a clinical pilot study.

            The introduction of computer-assisted surgery was a milestone in functional reconstructions of facial skeletal defects. We compared five computer-assisted and five conventional reconstructions with fibular grafts in the course of a pilot study. A rapid prototyping guide translated the computer-assisted surgery plan into intraoperative utilizable models. We intraoperatively measured the time needed for shaping the graft to the recipient site and the ischaemic time. Furthermore, the size of donor site defect compared to the required transplant length was evaluated. Shaping procedure and ischaemic time turned out significantly shorter when compared to conventional surgery without cutting guide (p = 0.014). Using surgical guides, there was no change between the defect size of the fibula and the necessary transplant size. In conventional surgery, a mean change of 1.92 cm occurred (p = 0.001). The surgical guide significantly reduced shaping time and consequently ischaemic time. These factors can influence flap survival. The fibular donor site defect was downsized. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Virtual Surgical Planning in Orthognathic Surgery

              Computer-aided surgical simulation has greatly enhanced the efficiency and accuracy of orthognathic surgery for correction of dentofacial deformities. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) improves the efficiency of the presurgical work-up and provides an opportunity to illustrate the multidimensional correction at the dental and skeletal level. VSP provides preoperative insight into the surgical intervention and the fabrication of cutting jigs/guides and templates can help decrease intraoperative surgical inaccuracies. VSP is rapidly becoming the standard of care for surgical treatment planning of dentofacial deformities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eplasty
                Eplasty
                ePlasty
                Eplasty
                Open Science Company, LLC
                1937-5719
                2017
                9 January 2017
                : 17
                : ic1
                Affiliations
                [1] aChicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University; Chicago, Ill
                [2] bMichigan State University, Grand Rapids, Mich
                [3] cGrand Rapids Medical Education Partners, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Residency, Grand Rapids, Mich
                [4] dPediatric Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, Mich
                Author notes
                Article
                1
                5238634
                d72c31d3-84fd-462e-b8cf-69cb71cf2bd3
                Copyright © 2017 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article whereby the authors retain copyright of the work. The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Interesting Case Series

                Surgery
                virtual surgical planning,orthognathic,cad/cam,le fort,bilateral sagittal split
                Surgery
                virtual surgical planning, orthognathic, cad/cam, le fort, bilateral sagittal split

                Comments

                Comment on this article