0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Understanding treatment burden in hemophilia: development and validation of the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To capture the broad range of treatment burden issues experienced by adolescent and adult people with hemophilia (PWH), the Hemophilia Treatment Experience Measure (Hemo-TEM) was developed. We describe the development of this new hemophilia-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure including concept elicitation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric validation.

          Results

          Concept elicitation interviews were conducted with 5 clinical experts and 30 adult PWH in the United States (US). The qualitative analysis of these interviews and a review of the literature informed the PRO measure development. The project team reviewed concept endorsement rates and generated a 27-item preliminary version of the Hemo-TEM. Cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted to ensure participant understanding and item relevance in samples of (adolescent (n = 20) and adult (n = 14)) PWH in the US. The refined, validation-ready version of the Hemo-TEM included 30 items. Lastly, data from 3 clinical trials comprised the 4 analysis sets used for the psychometric validation with a sample size of N = 88. Item reduction dropped 4 items resulting in a final 26-item measure. Factor analysis generated 5 domains in the Hemo-TEM [injection difficulties (3 items), physical impact (6 items), treatment bother (7 items), interference with daily life (4 items), and emotional impact (6 items)] and a total score. All scores were reliable [internally consistent (0.84–0.88)]. For convergent validity, with the exception of one domain, all hypothesized associations were met. Preliminary sensitivity to change effect sizes were between − 0.30 and − 0.70. Meaningful change thresholds ranged from 6 points (physical impact and emotional impact) to 10 points (treatment bother) with 8 points for the Hemo-TEM total score.

          Conclusions

          Findings from the concept elicitation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric validation phases provide evidence that the Hemo-TEM is a well-designed, valid, and reliable measure of the burden of hemophilia treatment, including treatment impact on adolescent and adult PWH.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-023-00550-6.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests

            Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

              Recently, an increasing number of systematic reviews have been published in which the measurement properties of health status questionnaires are compared. For a meaningful comparison, quality criteria for measurement properties are needed. Our aim was to develop quality criteria for design, methods, and outcomes of studies on the development and evaluation of health status questionnaires. Quality criteria for content validity, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity, reproducibility, longitudinal validity, responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and interpretability were derived from existing guidelines and consensus within our research group. For each measurement property a criterion was defined for a positive, negative, or indeterminate rating, depending on the design, methods, and outcomes of the validation study. Our criteria make a substantial contribution toward defining explicit quality criteria for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Our criteria can be used in systematic reviews of health status questionnaires, to detect shortcomings and gaps in knowledge of measurement properties, and to design validation studies. The future challenge will be to refine and complete the criteria and to reach broad consensus, especially on quality criteria for good measurement properties.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mbrod@thebrodgroup.net
                Journal
                J Patient Rep Outcomes
                J Patient Rep Outcomes
                Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2509-8020
                23 February 2023
                23 February 2023
                December 2023
                : 7
                : 17
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.430475.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0591 7571, The Brod Group, ; 219 Julia Ave, Mill Valley, CA USA
                [2 ]Evidera | PPD, 7101 Wisconsin Ave, Bethesda, MD USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.425956.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0391 2646, Novo Nordisk A/S, ; Vandtaarnsvej 112, Søborg Denmark
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0663-5838
                Article
                550
                10.1186/s41687-023-00550-6
                9950311
                36821002
                d75a4f21-196e-4b6b-8404-662c11745774
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 April 2022
                : 16 January 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004191, Novo Nordisk;
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2023

                hemophilia,patient-reported outcome measures,concept elicitation,interviews,qualitative research,psychometrics,adult,adolescent

                Comments

                Comment on this article