18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Painting and the eye

      review-article
      1 , 2 , * ,
      Developments in Health Sciences
      Akadémiai Kiadó
      ophthalmic diseases, paintings, visual acuity, vision, quality of vision

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article reviews various ophthalmic diseases in the most famous historical paintings. Sometimes, the ophthalmic diseases might also substantially affect the vision of artists and we can deduct from their paintings what ophthalmic problems could have influenced these painters. They have their own painting, which is greatly influenced not only by their brain but also by their actual visual acuity. The most important ophthalmic diseases, which might affect vision and styles of painting, are refractive errors, cataract, glaucoma, ocular inflammations like uveitis; corneal opacities; haemorrhage in the vitreous, macular, and retinal degenerations; and retinal detachment. In the history of the painting, the different styles can be recognised and very often the question raised is whether this style is influenced by the visual acuity of the artists or visual acuity has nothing to do with the different styles. The aim of this study is to demonstrate how ophthalmic problems might have influenced final arts during the past centuries.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Ophthalmology and art: simulation of Monet's cataracts and Degas' retinal disease.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A Brief History of Macular Grids

            Metamorphopsia is a symptom of retinal distortion from intrinsic retinal disease. It has undoubtedly been experienced for millennia, but its clinical significance has been appreciated only in modern times. The Norwegian painter Edvard Munch recognized scotomas and metamorphopsia after suffering an intraocular hemorrhage in his 60th year. Drawings made during this illness show his changing perceptions, and also his attempts to document them with a grid of lines. The Scottish philosopher Thomas Reid may have been the first to write about metamorphopsia. He described distortion of his vision in 1764, after an episode of sungazing, and recognized that the problem was probably of retinal origin. Lines or grids to document metamorphopsia have appeared in ophthalmology textbooks for more than 100 years, but testing for macular degeneration did not become routine until the dissemination of Amsler's grids in the middle of the 20th century. This is in large measure a result of developments in ophthalmology that made therapy for macular disease possible.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Vision, eye disease, and art: 2015 Keeler Lecture.

              M F Marmor (2016)
              The purpose of this study was to examine normal vision and eye disease in relation to art. Ophthalmology cannot explain art, but vision is a tool for artists and its normal and abnormal characteristics may influence what an artist can do. The retina codes for contrast, and the impact of this is evident throughout art history from Asian brush painting, to Renaissance chiaroscuro, to Op Art. Art exists, and can portray day or night, only because of the way retina adjusts to light. Color processing is complex, but artists have exploited it to create shimmer (Seurat, Op Art), or to disconnect color from form (fauvists, expressionists, Andy Warhol). It is hazardous to diagnose eye disease from an artist's work, because artists have license to create as they wish. El Greco was not astigmatic; Monet was not myopic; Turner did not have cataracts. But when eye disease is documented, the effects can be analyzed. Color-blind artists limit their palette to ambers and blues, and avoid greens. Dense brown cataracts destroy color distinctions, and Monet's late canvases (before surgery) showed strange and intense uses of color. Degas had failing vision for 40 years, and his pastels grew coarser and coarser. He may have continued working because his blurred vision smoothed over the rough work. This paper can barely touch upon the complexity of either vision or art. However, it demonstrates some ways in which understanding vision and eye disease give insight into art, and thereby an appreciation of both art and ophthalmology.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                dhs
                2066
                Developments in Health Sciences
                DHS
                Akadémiai Kiadó (Budapest )
                18 May 2018
                June 2018
                : 1
                : 1
                : 2-9
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Faculty of General Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University , Budapest, Hungary
                [ 2 ]Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University , Budapest, Hungary
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding address: Zoltán Zsolt Nagy; Faculty of General Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary; E-mail: dekan@ 123456se-etk.hu
                Article
                10.1556/2066.1.2018.02
                d7dcabda-621a-4e75-a1dc-181721daae40
                © 2018 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited, a link to the CC License is provided, and changes – if any – are indicated.

                History
                : 09 December 2017
                : 26 February 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 30, Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funding sources: No financial support was received for this study.
                Categories
                REVIEW ARTICLE

                Medicine,Immunology,Health & Social care,Microbiology & Virology,Infectious disease & Microbiology
                vision,ophthalmic diseases,paintings,quality of vision,visual acuity

                Comments

                Comment on this article