13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

          The flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pharmacokinetic interaction between mitotane and etoposide in adrenal carcinoma: a pilot study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The combination of mitotane and platinum-etoposide chemotherapy is a front-line treatment in metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), although this regimen shows limited efficacy. Pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction between mitotane, a strong CYP3A4 inducer, and etoposide, which is a substrate of CYP3A4, may contribute to chemoresistance. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the pharmacokinetic interaction between mitotane and etoposide in ACC patients.

          Methods

          Five consecutive ACC patients treated with platinum etoposide (120–150 mg/m 2 day 1–2–3 at cycle 1), with or without concomitant mitotane, were included. In the absence of limiting toxicity, a dose escalation of etoposide was proposed since cycle 2. Plasma etoposide concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography at 0, 4 and 24 h after each infusion. Clearance and area under the curve (AUC) of etoposide were determined at each cycle.

          Results

          Patients received two to six chemotherapy cycles, in association with mitotane ( N = 4) or after mitotane discontinuation ( N = 1). Etoposide clearance was two-fold higher with concomitant mitotane (4.95 L/h) than after mitotane discontinuation (2.53 L/h, P = 0.014), and 2.5-fold higher than that in reference population not treated with mitotane (1.81 L/h). Etoposide dose escalation was performed in four patients under mitotane, resulting in two minor tumor responses and one severe toxicity (febrile aplasia) at dose of 300 mg/m 2/day. Tumor response was associated with higher etoposide AUC (267.3 vs 188.8 mg.h/L, P = 0.04).

          Conclusion

          A drug–drug interaction between mitotane and etoposide may contribute to the low efficacy of platinum-etoposide chemotherapy. This pilot study suggests further a potential benefit of increasing etoposide dose in ACC patients receiving mitotane.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Combination chemotherapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.

          Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare cancer that has a poor response to cytotoxic treatment. We randomly assigned 304 patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma to receive mitotane plus either a combination of etoposide (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area on days 2 to 4), doxorubicin (40 mg per square meter on day 1), and cisplatin (40 mg per square meter on days 3 and 4) (EDP) every 4 weeks or streptozocin (streptozotocin) (1 g on days 1 to 5 in cycle 1; 2 g on day 1 in subsequent cycles) every 3 weeks. Patients with disease progression received the alternative regimen as second-line therapy. The primary end point was overall survival. For first-line therapy, patients in the EDP-mitotane group had a significantly higher response rate than those in the streptozocin-mitotane group (23.2% vs. 9.2%, P<0.001) and longer median progression-free survival (5.0 months vs. 2.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.69; P<0.001); there was no significant between-group difference in overall survival (14.8 months and 12.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.02; P=0.07). Among the 185 patients who received the alternative regimen as second-line therapy, the median duration of progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the EDP-mitotane group and 2.2 months in the streptozocin-mitotane group. Patients who did not receive the alternative second-line therapy had better overall survival with first-line EDP plus mitotane (17.1 month) than with streptozocin plus mitotane (4.7 months). Rates of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between treatments. Rates of response and progression-free survival were significantly better with EDP plus mitotane than with streptozocin plus mitotane as first-line therapy, with similar rates of toxic events, although there was no significant difference in overall survival. (Funded by the Swedish Research Council and others; FIRM-ACT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094497.).
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficiency and tolerance of mitotane in Cushing's disease in 76 patients from a single center.

            Alternatives to transsphenoidal pituitary surgery may be required in Cushing's disease (CD) as a first- or second-line treatment. Mitotane is a potent anti-cortisolic drug but has been rarely investigated in the treatment of CD. Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerance of mitotane in CD patients. Retrospective analysis of 76 patients treated with mitotane from 219 patients diagnosed with CD between 1993 and 2009 in a single center. Remission was defined as normalization of 24-h urinary free cortisol (24-h-UFC). Remission was achieved in 48 (72%) of the 67 long-term treated patients, after a median time of 6.7 (5.2-8.2) months. Mean plasma mitotane concentration at the time of remission was 10.5 ± 8.9 mg/l, with a mean daily dose of 2.6 ± 1.1 g. A negative linear relationship was observed between plasma mitotane concentration and 24-h-UFC (P<0.0001). Seventeen of 24 (71%) patients with durable remission subsequently experienced recurrence, after a median time of 13.2 (5.0-67.9) months. At the time of treatment discontinuation, ACTH concentration was statistically associated with a lower recurrence probability (hazard ratios 0.57 (0.32-1.00), P=0.05). Intolerance leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 19 patients (29%). A pituitary adenoma became identifiable during mitotane treatment in 12 (25%) of the 48 patients with initial negative pituitary imaging allowing subsequent transsphenoidal surgery. Mitotane is useful at different stages of CD. Mitotane dose adjustment based on plasma concentration monitoring and side effects could control hypercortisolism in the majority of CD patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sunitinib in refractory adrenocortical carcinoma: a phase II, single-arm, open-label trial.

              Treatment of refractory adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is not established. Animal experiments pointed toward adrenal toxicity of sunitinib. The objective of the study was to determine the antitumor effects of sunitinib in refractory ACC. This was a phase II, open-label trial using a two-stage accrual design. The study was conducted at two tertiary referral centers. Thirty-eight patients with refractory ACC progressing after mitotane and one to three cytotoxic chemotherapies participated in the study. The intervention included sunitinib at a standard dose (50 mg/d, 4 wk on, 2 wk off). Response was defined as progression-free survival (PFS) of 12 wk or longer (first tumor evaluation). Thirty-five patients could be evaluated for response. Five patients experienced stable disease, 24 had progressive disease, and six patients died from ACC before the first evaluation (naïve estimate five of 35=14.3%, median unbiased response rate 15.4%, 95% confidence interval 5.0-33.4%). The median PFS was 2.8 months. In responders, PFS ranged between 5.6 and 11.2 months and overall survival between 14.0 and 35.5 months. Of 36 serious adverse events, only nine were possibly related to sunitinib. Concomitant mitotane appeared to negatively impact on outcome. Furthermore, a negative correlation between the serum concentrations of sunitinib plus its active metabolite N-desethylsunitinib (SU12662) and mitotane (r=-0.650; P=0.114) was observed in seven evaluable patients suggestive of a relevant drug interaction. Sunitinib has modest activity in advanced refractory ACC, which compares favorably with other targeted treatments in these patients. Sunitinib serum levels might have been profoundly reduced by mitotane induced cytochrome P450-3A4 activity attenuating its antitumor activity and adverse effects. Together these findings suggest that sunitinib deserves further investigation in mitotane-naïve ACC patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Endocr Connect
                Endocr Connect
                EC
                Endocrine Connections
                Bioscientifica Ltd (Bristol )
                2049-3614
                December 2018
                09 November 2018
                : 7
                : 12
                : 1409-1414
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medical Oncology , Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, CARPEM, AP-HP, Paris, France
                [2 ]Institut Cochin , INSERM U1016, CNRS UMR8104, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
                [3 ]CHU Besançon , Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Dpt, Besançon cedex, France
                [4 ]Institut Claudius-Regaud , Université de Toulouse, INSERM, Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
                [5 ]Department of Endocrinology , Center for Rare Adrenal Diseases, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
                [6 ]Department of Pharmacy , Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, Paris, France
                [7 ]Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacochemistry Unit , Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, AP-HP, Paris, France
                [8 ]UMR8638 CNRS , Pharmacy UFR, University of Paris Descartes, PRES sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
                Author notes
                Correspondence should be addressed to A Jouinot: anne.jouinot@ 123456aphp.fr
                Article
                EC-18-0428
                10.1530/EC-18-0428
                6301193
                30533000
                d7fcba98-a9ea-45a1-b8fb-9ae9e4e9691b
                © 2018 The authors

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 05 November 2018
                : 09 November 2018
                Categories
                Research

                adrenocortical carcinoma,mitotane,etoposide,pharmacology,drug interaction

                Comments

                Comment on this article