21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      International Journal of COPD (submit here)

      This international, peer-reviewed Open Access journal by Dove Medical Press focuses on pathophysiological processes underlying Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) interventions, patient focused education, and self-management protocols. Sign up for email alerts here.

      39,063 Monthly downloads/views I 2.893 Impact Factor I 5.2 CiteScore I 1.16 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) I 0.804 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The influence of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) on dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and association with treatment efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been fully determined. In vitro studies have demonstrated adequate dose delivery through ELLIPTA DPI at PIF ≥30 L/min. This analysis of two clinical trials and a real-world population of COPD patients determined spirometric PIF distribution, and explored the relationship between PIF and outcomes in the trials.

          Methods

          The replicate Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind 207608/207609 (NCT03478683/NCT03478696) trials evaluated fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol via ELLIPTA DPI versus budesonide/formoterol+tiotropium in COPD patients. This post hoc analysis assessed spirometric PIF distribution at screening and relationship between PIF and lung function outcomes in the pooled 207608/207609 population. Spirometric PIF distributions in a real-world population of COPD patients were evaluated by retrospective analysis of the Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) database to assess similarities between clinical trial and real-world populations.

          Results

          A total of 1460 (207608/207609) and 3282 (KPNW) patients were included. There was considerable overlap between spirometric PIF distributions for both populations. Overall, 99.7% and 99.8% of the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations, respectively, reported spirometric PIF ≥50 L/min, estimated as equivalent to ELLIPTA PIFR ≥30 L/min. In the 207608/207609 combined analysis, there was no significant interaction between spirometric PIF and treatment for lung function endpoints, indicating treatment effect is independent of PIF.

          Conclusion

          Nearly all COPD patients in the 207608/207609 and KPNW populations achieved spirometric PIF values estimated as equivalent to PIFR of ≥30 L/min through the ELLIPTA DPI. Lack of correlation between spirometric PIF at screening and treatment efficacy aligns with consistent dose performance from the ELLIPTA DPI across a wide range of PIFs, achieved by patients with COPD of all severities.

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement

          Background: Spirometry is the most common pulmonary function test. It is widely used in the assessment of lung function to provide objective information used in the diagnosis of lung diseases and monitoring lung health. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society jointly adopted technical standards for conducting spirometry. Improvements in instrumentation and computational capabilities, together with new research studies and enhanced quality assurance approaches, have led to the need to update the 2005 technical standards for spirometry to take full advantage of current technical capabilities. Methods: This spirometry technical standards document was developed by an international joint task force, appointed by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society, with expertise in conducting and analyzing pulmonary function tests, laboratory quality assurance, and developing international standards. A comprehensive review of published evidence was performed. A patient survey was developed to capture patients’ experiences. Results: Revisions to the 2005 technical standards for spirometry were made, including the addition of factors that were not previously considered. Evidence to support the revisions was cited when applicable. The experience and expertise of task force members were used to develop recommended best practices. Conclusions: Standards and consensus recommendations are presented for manufacturers, clinicians, operators, and researchers with the aims of increasing the accuracy, precision, and quality of spirometric measurements and improving the patient experience. A comprehensive guide to aid in the implementation of these standards was developed as an online supplement.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Objective Assessment of Adherence to Inhalers by Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

            Objective adherence to inhaled therapy by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been reported.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Carbon footprint impact of the choice of inhalers for asthma and COPD

              In the 1990s, metered dose inhalers (MDIs) containing chlorofluorocarbons were replaced with dry-powder inhalers (DPIs) and MDIs containing hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs). While HFCs are not ozone depleting, they are potent greenhouse gases. Annual carbon footprint (CO2e), per patient were 17 kg for Relvar-Ellipta/Ventolin-Accuhaler; and 439 kg for Seretide-Evohaler/Ventolin-Evohaler. In 2017, 70% of all inhalers sold in England were MDI, versus 13% in Sweden. Applying the Swedish DPI and MDI distribution to England would result in an annual reduction of 550 kt CO2e. The lower carbon footprint of DPIs should be considered alongside other factors when choosing inhalation devices.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
                Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis
                copd
                copd
                International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                Dove
                1176-9106
                1178-2005
                12 April 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 933-943
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm, Sweden
                [2 ]Respiratory Therapy Area, GSK , Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
                [3 ]Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                [4 ]R&D, GSK , Ware, Hertfordshire, UK
                [5 ]Global Medical Affairs, GSK , Brentford, Middlesex, UK
                [6 ]Institute for Lung Health, University of Leicester , Leicester, Leicestershire, UK
                [7 ]Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Northwest Center for Health Research , Portland, OR, USA
                [8 ]Primary Care Research, University of Southampton , Southampton, UK
                [9 ]Biostatistics, GSK, Stockley Park West , Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
                [10 ]Pulmonary Research, Institute of Southeast Michigan , Farmington Hills, MI, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Gary T Ferguson Pulmonary Research, Institute of Southeast Michigan , Farmington Hills, MI, USATel +1 248-478-6561 Email garytferguson@msn.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-9307
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6968-4610
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5400-2536
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6979-2542
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0142-3534
                Article
                291554
                10.2147/COPD.S291554
                8055277
                33883890
                d83cfa33-312b-4656-a3bd-3e9a4885c5ac
                © 2021 Anderson et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 17 November 2020
                : 14 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 6, References: 38, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: GSK, open-funder-registry 10.13039/100004330;
                These studies were funded by GSK (study number 207608; NCT03478683; study number 207609; NCT03478696). The funders of the study had a role in the study design, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of the report. ELLIPTA and Diskus are owned by or licensed to the GSK Group of Companies. HandiHaler is a trademark of Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH.
                Categories
                Original Research

                Respiratory medicine
                copd,inhaled triple therapy,patient outcomes,real-world studies,peak inspiratory flow rate,dpi

                Comments

                Comment on this article