12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Pandemic Birthing: Childbirth Satisfaction, Perceived Health Care Bias, and Postpartum Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic

      case-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on birth satisfaction and perceived health care discrimination during childbirth, and in turn, the influence of these birth experiences on postpartum health.

          Study Design

          We conducted a cross-sectional, bilingual web survey of 237 women who gave birth at two hospitals in New York City and assessed patient-reported experience and outcomes following the first wave of SARS-CoV-2 infections in the New York region. We ascertained SARS-CoV-2 status at delivery from the electronic medical record using participant-reported name and date of birth. We compared birth experience during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 15, 2020–May 11, 2020) to a pre-pandemic response period (January 1, 2020–March 14, 2020). We estimated risk ratios for associations between birth experience and anxiety, depressive symptoms, stress, birth-related PTSD, emergency department visits, timely postpartum visit, and exclusive breastfeeding. Multivariable models adjusted for age, race-ethnicity, insurance, education, parity, BMI, previous experience of maltreatment/abuse and cesarean delivery.

          Results

          Women who gave birth during the peak of the pandemic response, and those that were SARS-CoV-2 positive, Black, and Latina, had lower birth satisfaction and higher perceived health care discrimination. Women with lower birth satisfaction were more likely to report higher postpartum anxiety, stress, depressive symptoms, and lower exclusive breastfeeding. Experiencing one or more incident of health care discrimination was associated with higher levels of postpartum stress and birth-related PTSD.

          Conclusion

          Hospitals and policy-makers should institute measures to safeguard against a negative birth experience during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among birthing people of color.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population.

            The 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) is a practical self-report anxiety questionnaire that proved valid in primary care. However, the GAD-7 was not yet validated in the general population and thus far, normative data are not available. To investigate reliability, construct validity, and factorial validity of the GAD-7 in the general population and to generate normative data. Nationally representative face-to-face household survey conducted in Germany between May 5 and June 8, 2006. Five thousand thirty subjects (53.6% female) with a mean age (SD) of 48.4 (18.0) years. The survey questionnaire included the GAD-7, the 2-item depression module from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and demographic characteristics. Confirmatory factor analyses substantiated the 1-dimensional structure of the GAD-7 and its factorial invariance for gender and age. Internal consistency was identical across all subgroups (alpha = 0.89). Intercorrelations with the PHQ-2 and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale were r = 0.64 (P < 0.001) and r = -0.43 (P < 0.001), respectively. As expected, women had significantly higher mean (SD) GAD-7 anxiety scores compared with men [3.2 (3.5) vs. 2.7 (3.2); P < 0.001]. Normative data for the GAD-7 were generated for both genders and different age levels. Approximately 5% of subjects had GAD-7 scores of 10 or greater, and 1% had GAD-7 scores of 15 or greater. Evidence supports reliability and validity of the GAD-7 as a measure of anxiety in the general population. The normative data provided in this study can be used to compare a subject's GAD-7 score with those determined from a general population reference group.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2).

              This study evaluates the two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2) as a measure for diagnosing and monitoring depression. We assessed construct validity in a cross-sectional sample of 1619 medical outpatients (mean age 43+/-14 years, 64% female) by comparing the PHQ-2 to four longer self-report questionnaires. Criterion validity was established in a subsample of 520 participants with reference to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Sensitivity to change was investigated in a prospective study of 167 patients who completed the SCID both at baseline and the 1-year follow-up. With reference to the SCID, the PHQ-2 had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 78% for major depressive disorder and a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 86% for any depressive disorder. Its diagnostic performance was comparable with that of longer depression scales. PHQ-2 change scores accurately reflected improved, unchanged, and deteriorated depression outcomes. The PHQ-2 performed favorably with respect to a standard diagnostic interview, as well as established depression scales and proved sensitive to change. Thus, the PHQ-2 appears promising as a brief multipurpose measure for detecting depression, grading its severity, and monitoring outcomes over time.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Teresa.Janevic@mountsinai.org
                Journal
                Matern Child Health J
                Matern Child Health J
                Maternal and Child Health Journal
                Springer US (New York )
                1092-7875
                1573-6628
                28 April 2021
                : 1-10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.59734.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0670 2351, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, , Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, ; New York, USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.59734.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0670 2351, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, , Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, ; One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1077, New York, NY 10029 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.422767.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2006 6531, Blavatnik Family Women’s Health Research Institute, ; New York, USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.59734.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0670 2351, Department of Health System Design and Global Health and the Arnhold Institute for Global Health, , Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, ; New York, USA
                [5 ]New York City Health+Hospitals/Elmhurst, New York, USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.59734.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0670 2351, Department of Nursing, Center for Nursing Research & Innovation, , Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, ; New York, USA
                [7 ]GRID grid.59734.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 0670 2351, Department of Psychiatry, , Icahn School of Medicine At Mount Sinai, ; New York, USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.25879.31, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8972, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, , University of Pennsylvania, ; Philadelphia, USA
                Article
                3158
                10.1007/s10995-021-03158-8
                8079857
                33909205
                d8b64494-e848-4f48-9d40-63eed11bcd31
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 21 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100011643, Blavatnik Family Foundation;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012421, Arnhold Institute for Global Health;
                Categories
                Brief Reports

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                covid-19,sars-cov-2,birth experience,health care discrimination,race,ethnicity,postpartum mental health,breastfeeding

                Comments

                Comment on this article