3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Staple-line leak post primary sleeve gastrectomy. A two patient case series and literature review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          There is an increasing trend in the number of bariatric surgeries performed worldwide, partly because bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) remains the most common bariatric surgery procedure performed, representing more than 50% of all primary bariatric interventions. Major surgical complications of SG include staple-line bleeding, leaking, and stenosis. A leak along the staple-line most commonly occurs at the gastroesophageal junction (GOJ).

          From January 2018 to December 2018, our centre performed 226 bariatric procedures, of which, 97.8% were primary bariatric procedures. The mean age and BMI were 38.7±8.3 years and 44 kg/m2, respectively. Out of the 202 primary SG performed, we encountered two cases of a staple-line leak (0.99%). This is the first reported case series of SG leaks from the Southeast Asia region. A summary of their characteristics, clinical presentation, subsequent management, and the outcome is discussed.

          Based on the latest available evidence from the literature, several methods may decrease staple-line leaks in SG. These include the use of a bougie size greater than 40 Fr, routine use of methylene blue test during surgery, beginning transection at 2–6 cm from the pylorus, mobilising the fundus before transection, and staying away from the GOJ at the last firing. Other methods include the proper alignment of the staple-line, control of staple-line bleeding, and performing staple-line reinforcement. The management of a staple-line leak remains challenging due to limited systematic, evidence-based literature being available. Therefore, a tailored approach is needed to manage this complication.

          Highlights

          • Major surgical complications of sleeve gastrectomy include staple-line bleeding, leaking, and stenosis.

          • The incidence of leak after sleeve gastrectomy is reported to be 0.74%.

          • We report a leak rate of 0.99%, based on 202 sleeve gastrectomy performed in a single centre.

          • This is the first reported case series of SG leaks from the Southeast Asia region to the best of our knowledge.

          • Based on the latest available evidence from the literature, several methods may decrease staple-line leaks in SG.

          • It is crucial that patients with this complication are managed by a multidisciplinary team.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: Primary, Endoluminal, and Revisional Procedures

          The International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO), being a Federation of 62 national societies, is the ideal network to monitor the number and type of procedures at a global level. The IFSO survey, enriched with a special section on revisional procedures, aims to report the number and types of bariatric procedures performed worldwide in 2016 and analyzes the surgical trends from 2008 to 2016.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of >12,000 cases.

            Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an emerging surgical approach, but 1 that has seen a surge in popularity because of its perceived technical simplicity, feasibility, and good outcomes. An international expert panel was convened in Coral Gables, Florida on March 25 and 26, 2011, with the purpose of providing best practice guidelines through consensus regarding the performance of LSG. The panel comprised 24 centers and represented 11 countries, spanning all major regions of the world and all 6 populated continents, with a collective experience of >12,000 cases. It was thought prudent to hold an expert consensus meeting of some of the surgeons across the globe who have performed the largest volume of cases to discuss and provide consensus on the indications, contraindications, and procedural aspects of LSG. The panel undertook this consensus effort to help the surgical community improve the efficacy, lower the complication rates, and move toward adoption of standardized techniques and measures. The meeting took place at on-site meeting facilities, Biltmore Hotel, Coral Gables, Florida.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass.

              To assess the safety and effectiveness of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as compared to the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB), the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and the open Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (ORYGB) for the treatment of obesity and obesity-related diseases. LSG is a newer procedure being done with increasing frequency. However, limited data are currently available comparing LSG to the other established procedures. We present the first prospective, multiinstitutional, nationwide, clinically rich, bariatric-specific data comparing sleeve gastrectomy to the adjustable gastric band, and the gastric bypass. This is the initial report analyzing data from the American College of Surgeons-Bariatric Surgery Center Network accreditation program, and its prospective, longitudinal, data collection system based on standardized definitions and collected by trained data reviewers. Univariate and multivariate analyses compare 30-day, 6-month, and 1-year outcomes including morbidity and mortality, readmissions, and reoperations as well as reduction in body mass index (BMI) and weight-related comorbidities. One hundred nine hospitals submitted data for 28,616 patients, from July, 2007 to September, 2010. The LSG has higher risk-adjusted morbidity, readmission and reoperation/intervention rates compared to the LAGB, but lower reoperation/intervention rates compared to the LRYGB and ORYGB. There were no differences in mortality. Reduction in BMI and most of the weight-related comorbidities after the LSG also lies between those of the LAGB and the LRYGB/ORYGB. LSG has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the LAGB and the LRYGB/ORYGB for data up to 1 year. As obesity is a lifelong disease, longer term comparative effectiveness data are most critical, and are yet to be determined.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ann Med Surg (Lond)
                Ann Med Surg (Lond)
                Annals of Medicine and Surgery
                Elsevier
                2049-0801
                02 July 2019
                August 2019
                02 July 2019
                : 44
                : 72-76
                Affiliations
                [a ]Surgical Trainee, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latiff, Bandar Tun Razak, Postcode 56000, Selangor, Malaysia
                [b ]Consultant Bariatric Surgeon, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latiff, Bandar Tun Razak, Postcode 56000, Selangor, Malaysia
                [c ]Consultant Upper Gastrointestinal & Bariatric Surgeon, Head of Unit of Upper Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latiff, Bandar Tun Razak, Postcode 56000, Selangor, Malaysia
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. looguohou@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2049-0801(19)30068-8
                10.1016/j.amsu.2019.06.014
                6614113
                31321031
                da63e450-db46-444b-b51b-fae7af0bff4c
                © 2019 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 15 May 2019
                : 7 June 2019
                : 26 June 2019
                Categories
                Original Research

                bariatric surgery,complications,southeast asia,asian population,endoscopic stenting

                Comments

                Comment on this article