3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Decisions on the quality of piano performance: Evaluation of self and others

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In common with other professional musicians, self-evaluation of practise and performance is an integral part of a pianist’s professional life. They will also have opportunities to listen to and evaluate the performances of others based on their own criteria. These self-constructed perspectives towards to a piano performance will have an influence on both self-evaluation and external evaluation, but whether differently or similarly is not known. Consequently, this research study aimed to explore how judgements on the perceived quality of a performance are undertaken by professional standard pianists and what criteria are applied, both with regards their own performances as well as the performance of others. Participants were six professional pianists (3 men, 3 women) who were based in the United Kingdom (Mean age = 31.5 years old. SD = 5.1). They were asked to play individually six trials of a piece of R. Schumann’s “Träumerei” Op. 15 No. 7 in a hired hall for recordings. Then, within 2 months, each participant was asked to come to a self-evaluation session to listen to and evaluate their own six recordings, using a Triadic method as a Repertory Grid. For the external evaluation focused session, the participants were asked to return again to evaluate a further six recordings made up of ‘best’ recordings as selected by each participant from their own individual self-evaluations. Analyses of the resultant data suggest that there was no significant difference between the participants in their overall ratings in the external phase, but that self-evaluation showed significant individual differences amongst several participants. The performance criteria in both self-evaluation and external evaluation predominately overlapped with each other in terms of musical factors, such as tone quality, phrasing, and pedalling. The ranking of the performances was highly correlated with perceptions of overall flow, tone quality and pedalling. It appears that pianists apply similar criteria to decide performance quality when evaluating their own performances as well as others.

          Related collections

          Most cited references88

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The psychology of personal constructs

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A review of the validity and accuracy of self-assessments in health professions training.

            Valid self-assessment is fundamental to continuing professional competence but is seldom explicitly taught in health professions training. This review analyzed 18 scholarly articles published between January 1970 and February 1990 (14 articles regarding health professions trainees, and four concerning college students or graduate trainees) in which it was possible to compare performance as self-assessed by trainees with performance as assessed by experts or objective tests. The validity of self-assessed performance was found to be low to moderate and did not improve with time in conventional health professions training programs. Self-assessed performance seemed closely related to generalized self-attributions and was minimally influenced by external feedback in the form of test scores, grades, or faculty assessments. In five programs emphasizing explicit self-assessment goals and training strategies, moderate-to-high validity outcomes or improvements over time were demonstrated. Much of what passes for self-assessment in training seems the exercise of an underdeveloped skill, but effective training to improve validity and accuracy is available and feasible.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Psychometric Theory

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                17 November 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 954261
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Graduate School of Teacher Education, Tokyo Gakugei University , Tokyo, Japan
                [2] 2UCL Institute of Education, University College London , London, United Kingdom
                Author notes

                Edited by: Aaron Williamon, Royal College of Music, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Caroline Palmer, McGill University, Canada; Bruno Gingras, University of Vienna, Austria

                *Correspondence: Yuki Morijiri, morijiri@ 123456u-gakugei.ac.jp

                This article was submitted to Performance Science, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954261
                9714486
                dc628c65-bb7d-4899-8c31-e48763440723
                Copyright © 2022 Morijiri and Welch.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 27 May 2022
                : 20 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 90, Pages: 17, Words: 13161
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                performance criteria,pianists,self-evaluation,external-evaluation,piano performance

                Comments

                Comment on this article