Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      COVID-19 outbreak situation and its psychological impact among surgeon in training in France

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Dear Editor, The COVID-19 outbreak is a challenge for health care workers (HCW). Young surgeons have switched immediately their daily practice into eclectic tasks (e.g., nursing patients in ICU, examining COVID patients…). These individuals represent one of the most at-risk population to become infected and potentially COVID-19 spillers. Only 2 weeks after the beginning of COVID-19 lockdown, a self-administered questionnaire was e-mailed to the members of the French Association of Urologists in Training (AFUF), who have been routinely evaluated concerning their stress [1, 2]. In less than 72 h, 275 (59.6%) members replied to the questionnaire (see Table 1). Overall 76.7% had COVID-19 patients in their department, 61.5% judged themselves unable to treat their symptoms and 75.3% did not receive any updated guidelines on respiratory tract infection treatment. Despite all the widespread recommendations given by the national authorities, only 43.3% felt to have sufficient personal protective equipment (PPE). According to this condition, 92% of the participants reported to be stressed, with a medium-to-high level of stress in 56.5% of the cases. Moreover, more than 60% of responders noted that this health crisis was impacting the quality of their work. Table 1 Responders characteristics N = 275 Age in years, mean (SD) 29.5 (0.47) Female gender, n (%) 90 (32.7) Medical history, n (%)  None 244 (88.7)  Respiratory 20 (7.3)  Other 11 (4) Psychiatry history, n (%) 3 (1.1) Smoker, n (%) 54 (19.6) Experience, n (%)  1st year-resident 21 (7.6)  2nd year-resident 33 (12)  3rd year-resident 30 (10.9)  4th year-resident 31 (11.3)  5th year-resident 41 (14.9)  Senior 90 (32.7)  Science research 29 (10.6) Presence of Covid-19 patients, n (%)  In the same building 253 (92)  In the same department 211 (76.7) Sufficient protection material, n (%) 119 (43.3) COVID-19 knowledge, n (%)  Ability to treat COVID-19 106 (38.6)  Updated on COVID-19 200 (72.7)  Updated on URTI 68 (24.7) COVID-19 negative impact, n (%)  On quality work (none to low) 109 (39.6)  On quality work (medium to high) 166 (60.4)  On urological training (none to low) 46 (16.7)  On urological training (medium to high) 229 (83.3)  Added level of stress (none to low) 120 (43.6)  Added level of stress (medium to high) 155 (56.5)  New psychiatric treatment initiated 2 (0.7) URTI Upper Respiratory Tract Infection Importantly, the increase of stress was significantly more frequent for those who were in a high epidemic region, when COVID-19 patients were in their department and when they already had a personal past medical history of respiratory disease. The pandemic was more likely to have a negative impact on the quality of work for the most experienced urologists in training and when COVID-19 patients were hospitalized in their own urology department. Moreover, 83.3% of the responders judged that the COVID crisis had a negative impact on their urological training, knowing that overall satisfaction with urology training in Europe is low [3], this finding has an additional psychological burden, since “being well trained” was a strong protective factor against burnout [2]. Several options could help mitigating the negative effects of the current situation: webinar as well as e-learnings including practical surgical videos [4, 5], could have the potential to create a supportive educational environment [6]. Updates on COVID-19 and guidelines on upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) should also be promoted by our institutions through webinar sessions, or even on social media [7]. Young urologists expressed that the crisis had an important impact on their work quality. This might be explained by the fear driven by unusual medical responsibilities far from surgical considerations, and far from their general medicine training. Hence, it is important to implement medical and psychological reinforcement in every urological team who is involved in the management of COVID-19 patients. During the crisis, it is important to keep in mind that young urologists in high epidemic regions require a particular attention. COVID-19 crisis seems to be a major stressor for urologists in training and could lead to poorer caregiver mental health. Managing the psychosocial well-being during this time appears to be of utmost importance not only for coronavirus but also in the perspective of future similar pandemic crisis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Current status of urology surgical training in Europe: an ESRU–ESU–ESUT collaborative study

          To determine the current status of surgical training amongst European Urology Residents, including their satisfaction with training and their confidence in performing procedures.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology

            Purpose With non-technical skills (NTS) deficits being recognised as a major cause for error in surgery, there is an increasing interest in their training and evaluation. A growing number of training courses are emerging and some NTS curricula have also been created. Many different training methods are described in the literature but there is still uncertainty with regards to their optimum combination within a curriculum. Methods A literature review of the electronic database Medline was performed. All articles published before December 2018 were screened by abstract and included if deemed relevant by the author. The included articles’ reference lists were also screened for further relevant studies. Results Simulation training is accepted as the most effective way to train NTS. Within simulation training, it is shown that the ‘igloo’ full immersion/distributed simulation environment is appropriate for teaching NTS in urological scenarios where a designated operating room or space is not available. The use of multiple settings, for example wards and clinics as well as the operating room, is advantageous, as is training in an interprofessional team. Classroom teaching also plays a role in NTS training as an adjunct to simulation, with evidence that it improves some parameters of NTS. All levels, including qualified surgeons, benefit from NTS training; however, adaptation to both trainee level and specialty is important. Although less time consuming, training juniors and seniors together mainly benefits juniors, and training NTS at the same time as technical skills detracts from the quality of teaching. Debriefing is an important part of training and should be well structured; there are many debriefing models in existence, allowing for choice of method based on examiner preference and participant demographic. Furthermore, examiners should be well briefed in their task and trained in NTS assessment. Conclusion To move forward, studies should combine tried and tested learning techniques into a curriculum covering all training levels, which should then be validated and followed up long term to ensure a positive impact on patient safety.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of and Predictive Factors for Burnout Among French Urologists in Training

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                morgan.roupret@aphp.fr
                Journal
                World J Urol
                World J Urol
                World Journal of Urology
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0724-4983
                1433-8726
                24 April 2020
                : 1-2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Ap-Hp, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, 75013 Paris, France
                [2 ]GRID grid.464538.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0638 3698, Clinique Pasteur, ; 31300 Toulouse, France
                [3 ]GRID grid.412180.e, ISNI 0000 0001 2198 4166, Department of Urology and Transplantation, , Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, ; Lyon, France
                [4 ]GRID grid.411535.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0638 9491, Department of Urology, , La Conception University Hospital, Assistance-Publique Marseille, ; Marseille, France
                [5 ]GRID grid.411154.4, ISNI 0000 0001 2175 0984, Department of Urology, , University Hospital of Rennes, ; Rennes, France
                [6 ]GRID grid.411162.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9336 4276, Department of Urology, , Poitiers University Hospital, ; Poitiers, France
                [7 ]GRID grid.490149.1, ISNI 0000 0000 9356 5641, Department of Urology, , Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, ; Paris, France
                [8 ]GRID grid.157868.5, ISNI 0000 0000 9961 060X, Department of Urology, , Montpellier University Hospital, ; Montpellier, France
                [9 ]GRID grid.42399.35, ISNI 0000 0004 0593 7118, Department of Urology, , Bordeaux University Hospital, ; Bordeaux, France
                [10 ]Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, Francois Rabelais University, Tours, France
                [11 ]GRID grid.411149.8, ISNI 0000 0004 0472 0160, Department of Urology and Transplantation, , Caen University Hospital, ; Caen, France
                [12 ]GRID grid.31151.37, Department of Urology, , Dijon University Hospital, ; Dijon, France
                [13 ]Department of Urology, CHU Pointe à Pitre, Guadeloupe, France
                [14 ]Department of Urology, Ramsay Santé, Clinique la Croix du Sud, Quint Fonsegrives, France
                [15 ]GRID grid.22937.3d, ISNI 0000 0000 9259 8492, Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, , Medical University of Vienna, ; Vienna, Austria
                Article
                3207
                10.1007/s00345-020-03207-x
                7181962
                32333109
                dd596235-159e-47ce-8b83-a17c2a542d0d
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 7 April 2020
                : 8 April 2020
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Urology
                Urology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content38

                Cited by14

                Most referenced authors119