0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sensing the environment by bacterial plant pathogens: What do their numerous chemoreceptors recognize?

      editorial
      1 , , 1 ,
      Microbial Biotechnology
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bacteria have evolved multiple sensing strategies to efficiently adapt to their natural hosts and environments. In the context of plant pathology, chemotaxis allows phytopathogenic bacteria to direct their movement towards hosts through the detection of a landscape of plant‐derived molecules, facilitating the initiation of the infective process. The importance of chemotaxis for the lifestyle of phytopathogens is also reflected in the fact that they have, on average, twice as many chemoreceptors as bacteria that do not interact with plants. Paradoxically, the knowledge about the function of plant pathogen chemoreceptors is scarce. Notably, many of these receptors seem to be specific to plant‐interacting bacteria, suggesting that they may recognize plant‐specific compounds. Here, we highlight the need to advance our knowledge of phytopathogen chemoreceptor function, which may serve as a base for the development of anti‐infective therapies for the control of phytopathogens.

          Abstract

          Number of chemoreceptor genes for the 10 most relevant plant pathogens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology.

          Many plant bacteriologists, if not all, feel that their particular microbe should appear in any list of the most important bacterial plant pathogens. However, to our knowledge, no such list exists. The aim of this review was to survey all bacterial pathologists with an association with the journal Molecular Plant Pathology and ask them to nominate the bacterial pathogens they would place in a 'Top 10' based on scientific/economic importance. The survey generated 458 votes from the international community, and allowed the construction of a Top 10 bacterial plant pathogen list. The list includes, in rank order: (1) Pseudomonas syringae pathovars; (2) Ralstonia solanacearum; (3) Agrobacterium tumefaciens; (4) Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae; (5) Xanthomonas campestris pathovars; (6) Xanthomonas axonopodis pathovars; (7) Erwinia amylovora; (8) Xylella fastidiosa; (9) Dickeya (dadantii and solani); (10) Pectobacterium carotovorum (and Pectobacterium atrosepticum). Bacteria garnering honourable mentions for just missing out on the Top 10 include Clavibacter michiganensis (michiganensis and sepedonicus), Pseudomonas savastanoi and Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. This review article presents a short section on each bacterium in the Top 10 list and its importance, with the intention of initiating discussion and debate amongst the plant bacteriology community, as well as laying down a benchmark. It will be interesting to see, in future years, how perceptions change and which bacterial pathogens enter and leave the Top 10. © 2012 The Authors. Molecular Plant Pathology © 2012 BSPP and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Root exudates: from plant to rhizosphere and beyond

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion.

              Microbial entry into host tissue is a critical first step in causing infection in animals and plants. In plants, it has been assumed that microscopic surface openings, such as stomata, serve as passive ports of bacterial entry during infection. Surprisingly, we found that stomatal closure is part of a plant innate immune response to restrict bacterial invasion. Stomatal guard cells of Arabidopsis perceive bacterial surface molecules, which requires the FLS2 receptor, production of nitric oxide, and the guard-cell-specific OST1 kinase. To circumvent this innate immune response, plant pathogenic bacteria have evolved specific virulence factors to effectively cause stomatal reopening as an important pathogenesis strategy. We provide evidence that supports a model in which stomata, as part of an integral innate immune system, act as a barrier against bacterial infection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                miguel.matilla@eez.csic.es
                tino.krell@eez.csic.es
                Journal
                Microb Biotechnol
                Microb Biotechnol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1751-7915
                MBT2
                Microbial Biotechnology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1751-7915
                06 November 2023
                January 2024
                : 17
                : 1 ( doiID: 10.1111/mbt2.v17.1 )
                : e14368
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Biotechnology and Environmental Protection Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Granada Spain
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Miguel A. Matilla, Tino Krell, Department of Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Prof. Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain.

                Email: miguel.matilla@ 123456eez.csic.es ; tino.krell@ 123456eez.csic.es

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8468-9604
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9040-3166
                Article
                MBT214368 MICROBIO-2023-458.R1
                10.1111/1751-7915.14368
                10832524
                37929806
                defd8d69-1dcf-415c-a0ae-b304dbb43768
                © 2023 The Authors. Microbial Biotechnology published by Applied Microbiology International and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 October 2023
                : 11 October 2023
                : 24 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 7, Words: 4486
                Funding
                Funded by: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas , doi 10.13039/501100003339;
                Award ID: 2023AEP002
                Funded by: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación , doi 10.13039/501100004837;
                Award ID: PID2019‐103972GA‐I00
                Award ID: PID2020‐112612GB‐I00
                Categories
                Editorial
                Editorial
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.6 mode:remove_FC converted:01.02.2024

                Biotechnology
                Biotechnology

                Comments

                Comment on this article