317
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Mass-flowering crops enhance wild bee abundance

      research-article
      , , ,  
      Oecologia
      Springer-Verlag
      Canola, Oilseed rape, Pollen, Spillover, Trap nests

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although agricultural habitats can provide enormous amounts of food resources for pollinator species, links between agricultural and (semi-)natural habitats through dispersal and foraging movements have hardly been studied. In 67 study sites, we assessed the interactions between mass-flowering oilseed rape fields and semi-natural grasslands at different spatial scales, and their effects on the number of brood cells of a solitary cavity-nesting bee. The probability that the bee Osmia bicornis colonized trap nests in oilseed rape fields increased from 12 to 59 % when grassland was nearby, compared to fields isolated from grassland. In grasslands, the number of brood cells of O. bicornis in trap nests was 55 % higher when adjacent to oilseed rape compared to isolated grasslands. The percentage of oilseed rape pollen in the larval food was higher in oilseed rape fields and grasslands adjacent to oilseed rape than in isolated grasslands. In both oilseed rape fields and grasslands, the number of brood cells was positively correlated with the percentage of oilseed rape pollen in the larval food. We show that mass-flowering agricultural habitats—even when they are intensively managed—can strongly enhance the abundance of a solitary bee species nesting in nearby semi-natural habitats. Our results suggest that positive effects of agricultural habitats have been underestimated and might be very common (at least) for generalist species in landscapes consisting of a mixture of agricultural and semi-natural habitats. These effects might also have—so far overlooked—implications for interspecific competition and mutualistic interactions in semi-natural habitats.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2515-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns?

          Pollination by bees and other animals increases the size, quality, or stability of harvests for 70% of leading global crops. Because native species pollinate many of these crops effectively, conserving habitats for wild pollinators within agricultural landscapes can help maintain pollination services. Using hierarchical Bayesian techniques, we synthesize the results of 23 studies - representing 16 crops on five continents - to estimate the general relationship between pollination services and distance from natural or semi-natural habitats. We find strong exponential declines in both pollinator richness and native visitation rate. Visitation rate declines more steeply, dropping to half of its maximum at 0.6 km from natural habitat, compared to 1.5 km for richness. Evidence of general decline in fruit and seed set - variables that directly affect yields - is less clear. Visitation rate drops more steeply in tropical compared with temperate regions, and slightly more steeply for social compared with solitary bees. Tropical crops pollinated primarily by social bees may therefore be most susceptible to pollination failure from habitat loss. Quantifying these general relationships can help predict consequences of land use change on pollinator communities and crop productivity, and can inform landscape conservation efforts that balance the needs of native species and people.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Foraging ranges of solitary bees

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits.

              Sustainable agricultural landscapes by definition provide high magnitude and stability of ecosystem services, biodiversity and crop productivity. However, few studies have considered landscape effects on the stability of ecosystem services. We tested whether isolation from florally diverse natural and semi-natural areas reduces the spatial and temporal stability of flower-visitor richness and pollination services in crop fields. We synthesised data from 29 studies with contrasting biomes, crop species and pollinator communities. Stability of flower-visitor richness, visitation rate (all insects except honey bees) and fruit set all decreased with distance from natural areas. At 1 km from adjacent natural areas, spatial stability decreased by 25, 16 and 9% for richness, visitation and fruit set, respectively, while temporal stability decreased by 39% for richness and 13% for visitation. Mean richness, visitation and fruit set also decreased with isolation, by 34, 27 and 16% at 1 km respectively. In contrast, honey bee visitation did not change with isolation and represented > 25% of crop visits in 21 studies. Therefore, wild pollinators are relevant for crop productivity and stability even when honey bees are abundant. Policies to preserve and restore natural areas in agricultural landscapes should enhance levels and reliability of pollination services. © 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +49-931-3182380 , +49-931-3184352 , andrea.holzschuh@uni-wuerzburg.de
                Journal
                Oecologia
                Oecologia
                Oecologia
                Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                0029-8549
                1432-1939
                1 November 2012
                1 November 2012
                June 2013
                : 172
                : 2
                : 477-484
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
                [ ]Biometry and Environmental System Analysis, University of Freiburg, Tennenbacher Str. 4, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
                [ ]Agroecology, Georg-August University, Grisebachstr. 6, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
                Author notes

                Communicated by Riccardo Bommarco.

                Article
                2515
                10.1007/s00442-012-2515-5
                3655217
                23114428
                df4960fa-da34-4d23-8fb5-5d5dd93ed536
                © The Author(s) 2012
                History
                : 27 March 2012
                : 11 October 2012
                Categories
                Plant-animal interactions - Original research
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

                Ecology
                canola,oilseed rape,pollen,spillover,trap nests
                Ecology
                canola, oilseed rape, pollen, spillover, trap nests

                Comments

                Comment on this article