11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Conferring cellulose-degrading ability to Yarrowia lipolytica to facilitate a consolidated bioprocessing approach

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Yarrowia lipolytica, one of the most widely studied “nonconventional” oleaginous yeast species, is unable to grow on cellulose. Recently, we identified and overexpressed two endogenous β-glucosidases in Y. lipolytica, thus enabling this yeast to use cello-oligosaccharides as a carbon source for growth. Using this engineered yeast platform, we have now gone further toward building a fully cellulolytic Y. lipolytica for use in consolidated bioprocessing of cellulose.

          Results

          Initially, different essential enzyme components of a cellulase cocktail (i.e,. cellobiohydrolases and endoglucanases) were individually expressed in Y. lipolytica in order to ascertain the viability of the strategy. Accordingly, the Trichoderma reesei endoglucanase I ( TrEG I) and II ( TrEG II) were secreted as active proteins in Y. lipolytica, with the secretion yield of EG II being twice that of EG I. Characterization of the purified His-tagged recombinant EG proteins (rh TrEGs) revealed that rh TrEG I displayed higher specific activity than rh TrEG II on both cellotriose and insoluble cellulosic substrates, such as Avicel, β-1, 3 glucan, β-1, 4 glucan, and PASC. Similarly, cellobiohydrolases, such as T. reesei CBH I and II ( TrCBH I and II), and the CBH I from Neurospora crassa ( NcCBH I) were successfully expressed in Y. lipolytica. However, the yield of the expressed TrCBH I was low, so work on this was not pursued. Contrastingly, rh NcCBH I was not only well expressed, but also highly active on PASC and more active on Avicel (0.11 U/mg) than wild-type TrCBH I (0.065 U/mg). Therefore, work was pursued using a combination of NcCBH I and TrCBH II. The quantification of enzyme levels in culture supernatants revealed that the use of a hybrid promoter instead of the primarily used TEF promoter procured four and eight times more NcCBH I and TrCBH II expressions, respectively. Finally, the coexpression of the previously described Y. lipolytica β-glucosidases, the CBH II, and EG I and II from T. reesei, and the N. crassa CBH I procured an engineered Y. lipolytica strain that was able to grow both on model cellulose substrates, such as highly crystalline Avicel, and on industrial cellulose pulp, such as that obtained using an organosolv process.

          Conclusions

          A Y. lipolytica strain coexpressing six cellulolytic enzyme components has been successfully developed. In addition, the results presented show how the recombinant strain can be optimized, for example, using artificial promoters to tailor expression levels. Most significantly, this study has provided a demonstration of how the strain can grow on a sample of industrial cellulose as sole carbon source, thus revealing the feasibility of Yarrowia-based consolidated bioprocess for the production of fuel and chemical precursors. Further, enzyme and strain optimization, coupled to appropriate process design, will undoubtedly lead to much better performances in the future.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13068-017-0819-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measurement of cellulase activities

          T. Ghose (1987)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: Biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recent progress in consolidated bioprocessing.

              Consolidated bioprocessing, or CBP, the conversion of lignocellulose into desired products in one step without added enzymes, has been a subject of increased research effort in recent years. In this review, the economic motivation for CBP is addressed, advances and remaining obstacles for CBP organism development are reviewed, and we comment briefly on fundamental aspects. For CBP organism development beginning with microbes that have native ability to utilize insoluble components of cellulosic biomass, key recent advances include the development of genetic systems for several cellulolytic bacteria, engineering a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at commercially attractive yields and titers, and engineering a cellulolytic microbe to produce butanol. For CBP organism development, beginning with microbes that do not have this ability and thus requiring heterologous expression of a saccharolytic enzyme system, high-yield conversion of model cellulosic substrates and heterologous expression of CBH1 and CBH2 in yeast at levels believed to be sufficient for an industrial process have recently been demonstrated. For both strategies, increased emphasis on realizing high performance under industrial conditions is needed. Continued exploration of the underlying fundamentals of microbial cellulose utilization is likely to be useful in order to guide the choice and development of CBP systems. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                zguo@insa-toulouse.fr
                duquesne@insa-toulouse.fr
                sbozonne@insa-toulouse.fr
                cioci@insa-toulouse.fr
                jean-marc.nicaud@inra.fr
                marty@insa-toulouse.fr
                michael.odonohue@insa-toulouse.fr
                Journal
                Biotechnol Biofuels
                Biotechnol Biofuels
                Biotechnology for Biofuels
                BioMed Central (London )
                1754-6834
                19 May 2017
                19 May 2017
                2017
                : 10
                : 132
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2353 1689, GRID grid.11417.32, Biocatalysis Group, INSA/INRA UMR 792, CNRS, , LISBP, Université de Toulouse, ; 135, Avenue de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, France
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 4910 6535, GRID grid.460789.4, Micalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, , Université Paris-Saclay, ; Jouy-en-Josas, France
                Article
                819
                10.1186/s13068-017-0819-8
                5438512
                28533816
                dfd204da-ac70-4dab-b2ff-fcb32adc01f9
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 14 February 2017
                : 13 May 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001665, Agence Nationale de la Recherche;
                Award ID: ANR-11-BTBR-0003
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Biotechnology
                yarrowia lipolytica,cellulolytic biocatalyst,cellulase,endoglucanase,cellobiohydrolase,β-glucosidase,consolidated bioprocessing,cellulose

                Comments

                Comment on this article