1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Associations of Socioeconomic Deprivation and Preterm Birth With Speech, Language, and Communication Concerns Among Children Aged 27 to 30 Months

      research-article
      , MSc 1 , , MA, MSc 2 , , PhD 3 , , MSc 3 , , MBChB 1 , , MA, MSc 4 , , FRCPCH, PhD 5 , 6 ,
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          What are the associations of socioeconomic deprivation and gestational age with preschool language ability?

          Findings

          In this cohort study of 26 341 children in Scotland, neighborhood deprivation and lower gestational age were associated with additive risks for speech, language, and communication concerns at age 27 to 30 months.

          Meaning

          Policies designed to lessen deprivation could be an important strategy for reducing preschool language impairment, including for children born preterm.

          Abstract

          This cohort study investigates the associations of neighborhood disadvantage, gestational age, and English as a first language with speech, language, and communication concerns at age 27 to 30 months among children in Scotland.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Successful acquisition of language is foundational for health and well-being across the life course and is patterned by medical and social determinants that operate in early life.

          Objective

          To investigate the associations of neighborhood disadvantage, gestational age, and English as first language with speech, language, and communication concerns among children aged 27 to 30 months.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cohort study used birth data from the National Health Service maternity electronic medical record linked to the Child Health Surveillance Programme for preschool children. The cohort included 28 634 children in the United Kingdom (NHS Lothian, Scotland) born between January 2011 and December 2014 who were eligible for a health review at age 27 to 30 months between April 2013 and April 2016. Data analysis was conducted between January 2018 and February 2019.

          Exposures

          The associations of neighborhood deprivation (using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2016 quintiles), gestational age, and whether English was the first language spoken in the home with preschool language function were investigated using mutually adjusted logistic regression models.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Speech, language, and communication (SLC) concern ascertained at age 27 to 30 months.

          Results

          Records of 28 634 children (14 695 [51.3%] boys) with a mean (SD) age of 27.7 (2.2) months were matched. After excluding records with missing data, there were 26 341 records. The prevalence of SLC concern was 13.0% (3501 of 26 963 children with SLC data). In fully adjusted analyses, each 1-week increase in gestational age from 23 to 36 weeks was associated with an 8.8% decrease in the odds of a child having an SLC concern reported at 27 months (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93). The odds of a child for whom English is not the first language of having SLC concern at age 27 to 30 months were 2.1-fold higher than those for a child whose first language is English (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.66-2.64). The odds ratio for having an SLC concern among children living in the most deprived neighborhoods, compared with the least deprived neighborhoods, was 3.15 (95% CI, 2.79-3.56). The estimated probabilities for preterm children having an SLC concern were highest for those living in the most deprived areas.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This study found that SLC concerns at age 27 to 30 months are common and independently associated with increasing levels of neighborhood deprivation and lower gestational age. Policies that reduce childhood deprivation could be associated with improved preschool language ability and potentially avoid propagation of disadvantage across the life course, including for children born preterm.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Socioeconomic status and the developing brain.

          Childhood socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with cognitive achievement throughout life. How does SES relate to brain development, and what are the mechanisms by which SES might exert its influence? We review studies in which behavioral, electrophysiological and neuroimaging methods have been used to characterize SES disparities in neurocognitive function. These studies indicate that SES is an important predictor of neurocognitive performance, particularly of language and executive function, and that SES differences are found in neural processing even when performance levels are equal. Implications for basic cognitive neuroscience and for understanding and ameliorating the problems related to childhood poverty are discussed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Socioeconomic gradients predict individual differences in neurocognitive abilities.

            Socioeconomic status (SES) is associated with childhood cognitive achievement. In previous research we found that this association shows neural specificity; specifically we found that groups of low and middle SES children differed disproportionately in perisylvian/language and prefrontal/executive abilities relative to other neurocognitive abilities. Here we address several new questions: To what extent does this disparity between groups reflect a gradient of SES-related individual differences in neurocognitive development, as opposed to a more categorical difference? What other neurocognitive systems differ across individuals as a function of SES? Does linguistic ability mediate SES differences in other systems? And how do specific prefrontal/executive subsystems vary with SES? One hundred and fifty healthy, socioeconomically diverse first-graders were administered tasks tapping language, visuospatial skills, memory, working memory, cognitive control, and reward processing. SES explained over 30% of the variance in language, and a smaller but highly significant portion of the variance in most other systems. Statistically mediating factors and possible interventional approaches are discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fetal Origins of Mental Health: The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease Hypothesis.

              The quality of fetal growth and development predicts the risk for a range of noncommunicable, chronic illnesses. These observations form the basis of the "developmental origins of health and disease" hypothesis, which suggests that the intrauterine signals that compromise fetal growth also act to "program" tissue differentiation in a manner that predisposes to later illness. Fetal growth also predicts the risk for later psychopathology. These findings parallel studies showing that antenatal maternal emotional well-being likewise predicts the risk for later psychopathology. Taken together, these findings form the basis for integrative models of fetal neurodevelopment, which propose that antenatal maternal adversity operates through the biological pathways associated with fetal growth to program neurodevelopment. The authors review the literature and find little support for such integrated models. Maternal anxiety, depression, and stress all influence neurodevelopment but show modest, weak, or no associations with known stress mediators (e.g., glucocorticoids) or with fetal growth. Rather, compromised fetal development appears to establish a "meta-plastic" state that increases sensitivity to postnatal influences. There also remain serious concerns that observational studies associating either fetal growth or maternal mental health with neurodevelopmental outcomes fail to account for underlying genetic factors. Finally, while the observed relation between fetal growth and adult health has garnered considerable attention, the clinical relevance of these associations remains to be determined. There are both considerable promise and important challenges for future studies of the fetal origins of mental health.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                11 September 2019
                September 2019
                11 September 2019
                : 2
                : 9
                : e1911027
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Information Services Division, NHS Lothian, NHS Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Medical Research Council/Chief Scientist Office Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Patrick Wild Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [4 ]Public Health and Health Policy, NHS Lothian, NHS Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [5 ]Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                [6 ]Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: July 22, 2019.
                Published: September 11, 2019. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11027
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2019 Ene D et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: James P. Boardman, FRCPCH, PhD, Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, Room W1.26, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom ( james.boardman@ 123456ed.ac.uk ).
                Author Contributions: Ms Ene had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Ene, Fletcher-Watson, O’Carroll, Mackenzie, Higgins, Boardman.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Ene, Der, Fletcher-Watson, Mackenzie, Higgins, Boardman.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Ene, Der, O’Carroll, Boardman.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ene, Der, Fletcher-Watson, Mackenzie, Higgins, Boardman.
                Statistical analysis: Ene, Der, Fletcher-Watson, Mackenzie, Boardman.
                Obtained funding: Boardman.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Mackenzie, Higgins.
                Supervision: Fletcher-Watson, Boardman.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: The study was funded in part by grant MC_PC_17209 from the Medical Research Council Mental Health Data Pathfinder program.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi190430
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11027
                6739726
                31509207
                dfd428aa-2740-4aab-b88c-956c522dcf20
                Copyright 2019 Ene D et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 24 May 2019
                : 22 July 2019
                Funding
                Funded by: Medical Research Council
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Pediatrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article