Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Detection and Quantification of Bremia lactucae by Spore Trapping and Quantitative PCR

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Bremia lactucae is an obligate, oomycete pathogen of lettuce that causes leaf chlorosis and necrosis and adversely affects marketability. The disease has been managed with a combination of host resistance and fungicide applications with success over the years. Fungicide applications are routinely made under the assumption that inoculum is always present during favorable environmental conditions. This approach often leads to fungicide resistance in B. lactucae populations. Detection and quantification of airborne B. lactucae near lettuce crops provides an estimation of the inoculum load, enabling more judicious timing of fungicide applications. We developed a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based assay using a target sequence in mitochondrial DNA for specific detection of B. lactucae. Validation using amplicon sequencing of DNA from 83 geographically diverse isolates, representing 14 Bremia spp., confirmed that the primers developed for the TaqMan assays are species specific and only amplify templates from B. lactucae. DNA from a single sporangium could be detected at a quantification cycle (C q) value of 32, and C q values >35 were considered to be nonspecific. The coefficient of determination (R 2) for regression between sporangial density derived from flow cytometry and C q values derived from the qPCR was 0.86. The assay was deployed using spore traps in the Salinas Valley, where nearly half of U.S. lettuce is produced. The deployment of this sensitive B. lactucae-specific assay resulted in the detection of the pathogen during the 2-week lettuce-free period as well as during the cropping season. These results demonstrate that this assay will be useful for quantifying inoculum load in and around the lettuce fields for the purpose of timing fungicide applications based on inoculum load.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Peronosporaceae of Korea

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Compendium of Lettuce Diseases

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              New York State Integrated Pest Management Program, Cornell University

              Seaman A. (2015)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Phytopathology®
                Phytopathology®
                Scientific Societies
                0031-949X
                1943-7684
                November 2016
                November 2016
                : 106
                : 11
                : 1426-1437
                Affiliations
                [1 ]First and tenth authors: Department of Plant Pathology, University of California-Davis, 1636 E. Alisal St. Salinas 93901; second, third, and eleventh authors: United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), 1636 E. Alisal St., Salinas, CA 93905; fourth author: Kunsan National University, Department of Biology, Gunsan 54150, Republic of Korea; fourth and fifth authors: Biodiversity and Climate Research Center (BiK-F) Senckenberg Gesellscharft für Naturforschung, D-60325...
                Article
                10.1094/PHYTO-03-16-0143-R
                e09a93bf-2270-4602-a6e7-aaf01ede916e
                © 2016
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article