3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Resilience factors play an important role in the mental health of parents when children survive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Resilience as a moderator of pain and stress.

          To study the predictive validity of the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) experimentally in relation to pain and stress. The submaximum tourniquet method was used to induce ischemic pain and stress. Eighty-four subjects were randomized to a low- or a high stress group, and selected to a low- or a high resilience group according to their scores on the RSA. Measures of pain and stress were taken every 5 min. Perceived pain and stress increased significantly throughout the experimental session, but individuals scoring high on the RSA reported less pain and stress. This protection was more pronounced for the high stress group, thus supporting a protective effect of resilience as measured by the RSA. The predictive validity of the RSA was confirmed. Due to the positive role of these factors in pain and stress perception, it may also be a promising measure for studies on pain patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Family Resiliency in Childhood Cancer*

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Psychological adjustment of parents of pediatric cancer patients revisited: five years later.

              We investigated the psychological functioning of parents of children suffering from pediatric cancer using a prospective design over a five-year time period. Parents of children diagnosed with cancer participated at diagnosis (T1), six months (T2), twelve months (T3), and five years later (T4, n = 115). Repeated measures ANOVAs were calculated for the three measures of psychological distress (GHQ, SCL-90 and STAI-S) to examine changes over time and gender differences. Independent T-tests were computed to examine differences between the mean scores of the parents at T4 and the norm groups. The effects of health status and earlier levels of distress on T4 functioning were examined using ANOVA and partial correlational analysis. Results showed that levels of reported distress, psychoneurotic symptoms and state anxiety significantly decreased across time to normal levels at T4 except on the GHQ. A significantly higher percentage of parents (27%) than in the norm group (15%) showed clinically elevated scores on the GHQ. Mothers had higher scores than fathers only on state anxiety. Parents of relapsed children reported higher anxiety levels than parents of surviving and deceased children. Psychological functioning at T1 was significantly related to functioning at T4. These results support the conclusion that although parental distress decreases with time, a significant number of parents still suffer from clinical distress after five years. Parents of relapsed children are at risk for long-term psychological problems as are those with higher levels of psychosomatic complaints at diagnosis. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Acta Paediatrica
                Acta Paediatr
                Wiley
                08035253
                January 2016
                January 2016
                November 12 2015
                : 105
                : 1
                : e30-e34
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Faculty of Nursing; The Research Centre for Health Promotion and Resources HiST/NTNU; Sør-Trondelag University College (HiST); Trondheim Norway
                [2 ]Department of Psychology; Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Trondheim Norway
                [3 ]Faculty of Social Science and Technology Management; Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU); Trondheim Norway
                [4 ]Section for Psychosomatics and CL-child Psychiatry; Women and Children's Division; Department of Clinical Neurosciences for Children; Oslo University Hospital; Oslo Norway
                Article
                10.1111/apa.13232
                e0c3d5b7-f329-4aa1-bfe9-df68ad93177a
                © 2015

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article