3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Maintenance after pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic lung disease: a randomized trial.

      American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
      Aftercare, methods, Aged, Attitude to Health, Dyspnea, etiology, Exercise Test, Exercise Therapy, Exercise Tolerance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Forced Expiratory Volume, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, psychology, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Readmission, statistics & numerical data, Program Evaluation, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, complications, physiopathology, rehabilitation, Quality of Life, Questionnaires, Reinforcement (Psychology), Respiratory Function Tests, Self Efficacy, Telephone

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pulmonary rehabilitation is beneficial for patients with chronic lung disease. However, long-term maintenance has been difficult to achieve after short-term treatment. We evaluated a telephone-based maintenance program after pulmonary rehabilitation in 172 patients with chronic lung disease recruited from pulmonary rehabilitation graduates. Subjects were randomly assigned to a 12-month maintenance intervention with weekly telephone contacts and monthly supervised reinforcement sessions (n = 87) or standard care (n = 85) and followed for 24 months. Except for a slight imbalance between sexes, experimental and control groups were equivalent at baseline and showed similar improvements after rehabilitation. During the 12-month intervention, exercise tolerance (maximum treadmill workload and 6-minute walk distance) and overall health status ratings were better maintained in the experimental group together with a reduction in hospital days. There were no group differences for other measures of pulmonary function, dyspnea, self-efficacy, generic and disease-specific quality of life, and health care use. By 24 months, there were no significant group differences. Patients returned to levels close to but above prerehabilitation measures. We conclude that a maintenance program of weekly telephone calls and monthly supervised sessions produced only modest improvements in the maintenance of benefits after pulmonary rehabilitation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article