21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pap Testing in a High-Income Country with Suboptimal Compliance Levels: A Survey on Acceptance Factors among Sicilian Women

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cervical cancer screening is uncommon, especially in low-income countries and among lower socioeconomic status people in high-income countries. The aims of this study were to examine the adherence of Sicilian women to Pap testing and to identify the determinants of this in a population with a secondary prevention attitude lower than high-income countries and the national average. A cross-sectional study called “Save Eva in Sicily” was conducted among all women aged 25–64 years, with a sample drawn by the list of general practitioners (GPs), using a proportional sampling scheme, stratified by age and resident population. The study outcome was performing a Pap test within the past three years. The association between the outcome and Pap test determinants was analyzed through a multivariable logistic regression. Among the 365 interviewed women, 66% ( n = 243) had a Pap test during the last 3 years. On the other hand, 18% of the other women ( n = 66) had performed at least one Pap test previously and 16% ( n = 56) had never had a Pap test. In a multivariable model, GPs’ advice (adjusted OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.57–4.14) and perceived susceptibility (adjusted OR 3.24; 95% CI 1.92–5.48) increased the likelihood of the execution of a Pap test. The “Save Eva in Sicily” study identified GP advice and perceived cancer severity as the main correlates of Pap testing among Sicilian women, producing evidence regarding how policy makers can increase compliance. Interventions to increase Pap test adhesion should focus on stimulating GPs to identify patients who regularly do not undergo it and to recommend testing on a regular basis to their patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.

          Cancer screening is critical for early detection and a lack of screening is associated with late-stage diagnosis and lower survival rates. The goal of this review was to analyze studies that focused on the role of provider-patient communication in screening behavior for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer. A comprehensive search was conducted in four online databases between 1992 and 2016. Studies were included when the provider being studied was a primary care provider and the communication was face-to-face. The search resulted in 3252 records for review and 35 articles were included in the review. Studies were divided into three categories: studies comparing recommendation status to screening compliance; studies examining the relationship between communication quality and screening behavior; and intervention studies that used provider communication to improve screening behavior. There is overwhelming evidence that provider recommendation significantly improves screening rates. Studies examining quality of communication are heterogeneous in method, operationalization and results, but suggest giving information and shared decision making had a significant relationship with screening behavior. Intervention studies were similarly heterogeneous and showed positive results of communication interventions on screening behavior. Overall, results suggest that provider recommendation is necessary but not sufficient for optimal adherence to cancer screening guidelines. Quality studies suggest that provider-patient communication is more nuanced than just a simple recommendation. Discussions surrounding the recommendation may have an important bearing on a person's decision to get screened. Research needs to move beyond studies examining recommendations and adherence and focus more on the relationship between communication quality and screening adherence.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            GLOBOCAN 2020: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2020

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus testing to screen for cervical cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

              Screening programs using conventional cytology have successfully reduced cervical cancer, but newer tests might enhance screening. To systematically review the evidence on liquid-based cytology (LBC) and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) screening for U.S. Preventive Services Task Force use in updating its 2003 recommendation. MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO from January 2000 through September 2010. Two independent reviewers selected fair- to good-quality English-language studies that compared LBC or HPV-enhanced primary screening with conventional cytology in countries with developed population-based screening for cervical cancer. At least 2 independent reviewers critically appraised and rated the quality of studies and used standardized abstraction forms to extract data about test performance for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer and screening-related harms. On the basis of 4 fair- to good-quality studies (141 566 participants), LBC had equivalent sensitivity and specificity to conventional cytology. Six fair- to good-quality diagnostic accuracy studies showed that 1-time HPV screening was more sensitive than cytology for detecting CIN3+/CIN2+ but was less specific. On the basis of 2 fair- to good-quality randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) (120 533 participants), primary HPV screening detected more cases of CIN3 or cancer in women older than 30 years. Four fair- to good-quality diagnostic accuracy studies and 4 fair- to good-quality RCTs showed mixed results of cotesting (HPV plus cytology) in women aged 30 years or older compared with cytology alone, with no clear advantage over primary HPV screening. Incomplete reporting of results for all screening rounds, including detection of disease and colposcopies, limits our ability to determine the net benefit of HPV-enhanced testing strategies. Resources were insufficient to gather unpublished data, short-term trial data showed possible ascertainment bias, and most RCTs used protocols that differed from current U.S. practice. Evidence supports the use of LBC or conventional cytology for cervical cancer screening, but more complete evidence is needed before HPV-enhanced primary screening is widely adopted for women aged 30 years or older.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                22 August 2018
                September 2018
                : 15
                : 9
                : 1804
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother-Child Care “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 133, 90127 Palermo, Italy; claudio.costantino01@ 123456unipa.it (C.C.); g.napoli15@ 123456virgilio.it (G.N.); alessandra.casuccio@ 123456unipa.it (A.C.)
                [2 ]Department of Health Services and Epidemiological Observatory, Regional Health Authority, Sicilian Region, Via Mario Vaccaro 5, 90145 Palermo, Italy; antonello.marras@ 123456regione.sicilia.it (A.M.); achille.cernigliaro@ 123456regione.sicilia.it (A.C.)
                [3 ]Regional Center for Paediatric Diabetes and Obesity, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale Caltanissetta, Via Malta 71, 93100 Caltanissetta, Italy; sabrinascelfo@ 123456alice.it
                [4 ]Preventive Health Department, Cancer Registry, ASP Trapani, Via Ammiraglio Staiti 95, 91100 Trapani, Italy; trusyit@ 123456yahoo.it
                [5 ]National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy; angela.giusti@ 123456iss.it (A.G.); stefania.spila@ 123456iss.it (S.S.A.)
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-884X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3397-7331
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5676-9535
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-7847
                Article
                ijerph-15-01804
                10.3390/ijerph15091804
                6165068
                30131461
                e2de2a15-0821-49c7-87f7-ec362d224aec
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 21 July 2018
                : 20 August 2018
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                pap test,screening,prevention,general practitioner,health belief model,cervical cancer,refusal,susceptibility

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content149

                Cited by13

                Most referenced authors244