4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      COVID-19 in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the risk and prevalence of pregnancy loss

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Pregnant women infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are more likely to experience preterm birth and their neonates are more likely to be stillborn or admitted to a neonatal unit. The World Health Organization declared in May 2023 an end to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic as a global health emergency. However, pregnant women are still becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 and there is limited information available regarding the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection in early pregnancy on pregnancy outcomes.

          OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

          We conducted this systematic review to determine the prevalence of early pregnancy loss in women with SARS-Cov-2 infection and compare the risk to pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection.

          SEARCH METHODS

          Our systematic review is based on a prospectively registered protocol. The search of PregCov19 consortium was supplemented with an extra electronic search specifically on pregnancy loss in pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 up to 10 March 2023 in PubMed, Google Scholar, and LitCovid. We included retrospective and prospective studies of pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, provided that they contained information on pregnancy losses in the first and/or second trimester. Primary outcome was miscarriage defined as a pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of gestation, however, studies that reported loss up to 22 or 24 weeks were also included. Additionally, we report on studies that defined the pregnancy loss to occur at the first and/or second trimester of pregnancy without specifying gestational age, and for second trimester miscarriage only when the study presented stillbirths and/or foetal losses separately from miscarriages. Data were stratified into first and second trimester. Secondary outcomes were ectopic pregnancy (any extra-uterine pregnancy), and termination of pregnancy. At least three researchers independently extracted the data and assessed study quality. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and risk differences (RDs) with corresponding 95% CI and pooled the data using random effects meta-analysis. To estimate risk prevalence, we performed meta-analysis on proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed by I 2.

          OUTCOMES

          We included 120 studies comprising a total of 168 444 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection; of which 18 233 women were in their first or second trimester of pregnancy. Evidence level was considered to be of low to moderate certainty, mostly owing to selection bias. We did not find evidence of an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and miscarriage (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.81–1.48; I 2 = 0.0%; RD 0.0012, 95% CI −0.0103 to 0.0127; I 2 = 0%; 9 studies, 4439 women). Miscarriage occurred in 9.9% (95% CI 6.2–14.0%; I 2 = 68%; 46 studies, 1797 women) of the women with SARS CoV-2 infection in their first trimester and in 1.2% (95% CI 0.3–2.4%; I 2 = 34%; 33 studies; 3159 women) in the second trimester. The proportion of ectopic pregnancies in women with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.4% (95% CI 0.02–4.2%; I 2 = 66%; 14 studies, 950 women). Termination of pregnancy occurred in 0.6% of the women (95% CI 0.01–1.6%; I 2 = 79%; 39 studies; 1166 women).

          WIDER IMPLICATIONS

          Our study found no indication that SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first or second trimester increases the risk of miscarriages. To provide better risk estimates, well-designed studies are needed that include pregnant women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection at conception and early pregnancy and consider the association of clinical manifestation and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection with pregnancy loss, as well as potential confounding factors such as previous pregnancy loss. For clinical practice, pregnant women should still be advised to take precautions to avoid risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

          Graphical abstract

          An analysis of studies on the prevalence of early pregnancy loss in women infected with SARS-CoV-2 compared to pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection showed no indications that SARS-CoV-2 infection increases risk of miscarriage. SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; OR, odds ratio.

          Related collections

          Most cited references159

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis

          Abstract Objective To determine the clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant and recently pregnant women with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19). Design Living systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane database, WHO COVID-19 database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases from 1 December 2019 to 26 June 2020, along with preprint servers, social media, and reference lists. Study selection Cohort studies reporting the rates, clinical manifestations (symptoms, laboratory and radiological findings), risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes in pregnant and recently pregnant women with suspected or confirmed covid-19. Data extraction At least two researchers independently extracted the data and assessed study quality. Random effects meta-analysis was performed, with estimates pooled as odds ratios and proportions with 95% confidence intervals. All analyses will be updated regularly. Results 77 studies were included. Overall, 10% (95% confidence interval 7% to14%; 28 studies, 11 432 women) of pregnant and recently pregnant women attending or admitted to hospital for any reason were diagnosed as having suspected or confirmed covid-19. The most common clinical manifestations of covid-19 in pregnancy were fever (40%) and cough (39%). Compared with non-pregnant women of reproductive age, pregnant and recently pregnant women with covid-19 were less likely to report symptoms of fever (odds ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.85; I2=74%; 5 studies; 80 521 women) and myalgia (0.48, 0.45 to 0.51; I2=0%; 3 studies; 80 409 women) and were more likely to need admission to an intensive care unit (1.62, 1.33 to 1.96; I2=0%) and invasive ventilation (1.88, 1.36 to 2.60; I2=0%; 4 studies, 91 606 women). 73 pregnant women (0.1%, 26 studies, 11 580 women) with confirmed covid-19 died from any cause. Increased maternal age (1.78, 1.25 to 2.55; I2=9%; 4 studies; 1058 women), high body mass index (2.38, 1.67 to 3.39; I2=0%; 3 studies; 877 women), chronic hypertension (2.0, 1.14 to 3.48; I2=0%; 2 studies; 858 women), and pre-existing diabetes (2.51, 1.31 to 4.80; I2=12%; 2 studies; 858 women) were associated with severe covid-19 in pregnancy. Pre-existing maternal comorbidity was a risk factor for admission to an intensive care unit (4.21, 1.06 to 16.72; I2=0%; 2 studies; 320 women) and invasive ventilation (4.48, 1.40 to 14.37; I2=0%; 2 studies; 313 women). Spontaneous preterm birth rate was 6% (95% confidence interval 3% to 9%; I2=55%; 10 studies; 870 women) in women with covid-19. The odds of any preterm birth (3.01, 95% confidence interval 1.16 to 7.85; I2=1%; 2 studies; 339 women) was high in pregnant women with covid-19 compared with those without the disease. A quarter of all neonates born to mothers with covid-19 were admitted to the neonatal unit (25%) and were at increased risk of admission (odds ratio 3.13, 95% confidence interval 2.05 to 4.78, I2=not estimable; 1 study, 1121 neonates) than those born to mothers without covid-19. Conclusion Pregnant and recently pregnant women are less likely to manifest covid-19 related symptoms of fever and myalgia than non-pregnant women of reproductive age and are potentially more likely to need intensive care treatment for covid-19. Pre-existing comorbidities, high maternal age, and high body mass index seem to be risk factors for severe covid-19. Preterm birth rates are high in pregnant women with covid-19 than in pregnant women without the disease. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42020178076. Readers’ note This article is a living systematic review that will be updated to reflect emerging evidence. Updates may occur for up to two years from the date of original publication.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement.

            In the course of performing systematic reviews on the prevalence of low back and neck pain, we required a tool to assess the risk of study bias. Our objectives were to (1) modify an existing checklist and (2) test the final tool for interrater agreement. The final tool consists of 10 items addressing four domains of bias plus a summary risk of bias assessment. Two researchers tested the interrater agreement of the tool by independently assessing 54 randomly selected studies. Interrater agreement overall and for each individual item was assessed using the proportion of agreement and Kappa statistic. Raters found the tool easy to use, and there was high interrater agreement: overall agreement was 91% and the Kappa statistic was 0.82 (95% confidence interval: 0.76, 0.86). Agreement was almost perfect for the individual items on the tool and moderate for the summary assessment. We have addressed a research gap by modifying and testing a tool to assess risk of study bias. Further research may be useful for assessing the applicability of the tool across different conditions. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 and coagulation: bleeding and thrombotic manifestations of SARS-CoV-2 infection

              Publisher's Note: There is a Blood Commentary on this article in this issue.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Hum Reprod Update
                Hum Reprod Update
                humupd
                Human Reproduction Update
                Oxford University Press
                1355-4786
                1460-2369
                Mar-Apr 2024
                28 November 2023
                28 November 2023
                : 30
                : 2
                : 133-152
                Affiliations
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Satellite , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham, UK
                NIHR Biomedical Research Center, University Hospitals Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham, UK
                NIHR Biomedical Research Center, University Hospitals Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women’s Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal (IRYCIS) , Madrid, Spain
                CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP) , Madrid, Spain
                UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization , Geneva, Switzerland
                UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization , Geneva, Switzerland
                Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation , Washington, DC, USA
                Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London , London, UK
                Barts Health NHS Trust , London, UK
                St George’s University London , London, UK
                Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Women and Childrens Hospital, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department Vrouw & Baby, Utrecht UMC, location University of Utrecht , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Department Vrouw & Baby, Utrecht UMC, location University of Utrecht , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham, UK
                NIHR Biomedical Research Center, University Hospitals Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                Tommy's Centre for Miscarriage Research , Birmingham, UK
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Satellite , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence address. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: m.vanwely@ 123456amsterdamumc.nl https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-213X
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8263-213X
                Article
                dmad030
                10.1093/humupd/dmad030
                10905512
                38016805
                e3390d26-a46a-42db-ac35-4b7fec2050be
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 3 August 2023
                : 1 October 2023
                : 8 November 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: German Federal Ministry of Health;
                Funded by: World Health Organization, DOI 10.13039/100004423;
                Funded by: World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction;
                Categories
                Review
                AcademicSubjects/MED00460
                AcademicSubjects/MED00905

                Human biology
                sars-cov-2,severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,covid-19,coronavirus disease 2019,miscarriage,(early) pregnancy loss,ectopic pregnancy,abortion,spontaneous abortion,termination of pregnancy

                Comments

                Comment on this article