32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Post-tonsillectomy taste dysfunction: Myth or reality?

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Lingual branches of the glossopharyngeal nerve (CN Ⅸ) are at risk of injury during tonsillectomy due to their proximity to the muscle layer of the palatine tonsillar bed. However, it is unclear how often this common surgery leads to taste disturbances. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, PsychInfo, and Ovid Medline to evaluate the available literature on post-tonsillectomy taste disorders. Studies denoting self-reported dysfunction, as well as those employing quantitative testing, i.e., chemogustometry and electrogustometry, were identified. Case reports were excluded. Of the 8 original articles that met our inclusion criteria, only 5 employed quantitative taste tests. The highest prevalence of self-reported taste disturbances occurred two weeks after surgery (32%). Two studies reported post-operative chemical gustometry scores consistent with hypogeusia. However, in the two studies that compared pre- and post-tonsillectomy test scores, one found no difference and the other found a significant difference only for the left rear of the tongue 14 days post-op. In the two studies that employed electrogustometry, elevated post-operative thresholds were noted, although only one compared pre- and post-operative thresholds. This study found no significant differences. No study employed a normal control group to assess the influences of repeated testing on the sensory measures. Overall, this review indicates that studies on post-tonsillectomy taste disorders are limited and ambiguous. Future research employing appropriate control groups and taste testing procedures are needed to define the prevalence, duration, and nature of post-tonsillectomy taste disorders.

          Related collections

          Most cited references42

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Accuracy of self-report in detecting taste dysfunction.

          To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of responses to the following questionnaire statements in detecting taste loss: "I can detect salt in chips, pretzels, or salted nuts," "I can detect sourness in vinegar, pickles, or lemon," "I can detect sweetness in soda, cookies, or ice cream," and "I can detect bitterness, in coffee, beer, or tonic water." Responses to an additional item, "I can detect chocolate in cocoa, cake or candy," was examined to determine whether patients clearly differentiate between taste loss and flavor loss secondary to olfactory dysfunction. A total of 469 patients (207 men, mean age = 54 years, standard deviation = 15 years; and 262 women, mean age = 54 years, standard deviation = 14 years) were administered a questionnaire containing these questions with the response categories of "easily," "somewhat," and "not at all," followed by a comprehensive taste and smell test battery. The questionnaire items poorly detected bona fide taste problems. However, they were sensitive in detecting persons without such problems (i.e., they exhibited low positive but high negative predictive value). Dysfunction categories of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) were not meaningfully related to subjects' responses to the questionnaire statements. Both sex and age influenced performance on most of the taste tests, with older persons performing more poorly than younger ones and women typically outperforming men. Although it is commonly assumed that straight-forward questions concerning taste may be useful in detecting taste disorders, this study suggests this is not the case. However, patients who specifically report having no problems with taste perception usually do not exhibit taste dysfunction. The difficulty in detecting true taste problems by focused questionnaire items likely reflects a combination of factors. These include the relatively low prevalence of taste deficits in the general population and the tendency of patients to confuse loss of olfaction-related flavor sensations with taste-bud mediated deficits.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Ghrelin Is Produced in Taste Cells and Ghrelin Receptor Null Mice Show Reduced Taste Responsivity to Salty (NaCl) and Sour (Citric Acid) Tastants

            Background The gustatory system plays a critical role in determining food preferences, food intake and energy balance. The exact mechanisms that fine tune taste sensitivity are currently poorly defined, but it is clear that numerous factors such as efferent input and specific signal transduction cascades are involved. Methodology/Principal Findings Using immunohistochemical analyses, we show that ghrelin, a hormone classically considered to be an appetite-regulating hormone, is present within the taste buds of the tongue. Prepro-ghrelin, prohormone convertase 1/3 (PC 1/3), ghrelin, its cognate receptor (GHSR), and ghrelin-O-acyltransferase (GOAT , the enzyme that activates ghrelin) are expressed in Type I, II, III and IV taste cells of mouse taste buds. In addition, ghrelin and GHSR co-localize in the same taste cells, suggesting that ghrelin works in an autocrine manner in taste cells. To determine a role for ghrelin in modifying taste perception, we performed taste behavioral tests using GHSR null mice. GHSR null mice exhibited significantly reduced taste responsivity to sour (citric acid) and salty (sodium chloride) tastants. Conclusions/Significance These findings suggest that ghrelin plays a local modulatory role in determining taste bud signaling and function and could be a novel mechanism for the modulation of salty and sour taste responsivity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effects of mouth movements, swallowing, and spitting on retronasal odor perception.

              Although attempts have been made to compare sensations produced by orthonasal and retronasal olfactory stimulation, previous studies have failed to address the dynamic nature of retronasal perception. In this study we demonstrate the importance of oral movements in influencing the perceived retronasal olfactory intensity. For orally-presented solutions of artificial orange and rum extract solutions, average magnitude estimates of eight subjects were significantly increased by various mouth movements (including spitting and swallowing) over a no mouth movement condition. These findings demonstrate that retronasal odor perception is a highly dynamic process, and suggest the hypothesis that mouth movements play a role in retronasal odor perception analogous to that played by sniffing in orthonasal perception. In addition, these data suggest that some disorders of deglutition may have associated chemosensory consequences.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg
                World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg
                World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
                KeAi Publishing
                2095-8811
                2589-1081
                March 2018
                03 April 2018
                : 4
                : 1
                : 77-83
                Affiliations
                [1]Smell and Taste Center, Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. Liuba.Soldatova@ 123456uphs.upenn.edu
                Article
                S2095-8811(18)30018-0
                10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.02.008
                6051494
                30035265
                e379d80b-31e9-4fb6-adc9-ecf5f5d5fb7a
                © 2018 Chinese Medical Association

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 6 February 2018
                : 28 February 2018
                Categories
                Review Articles and Research Paper

                tonsillectomy,taste,ageusia,hypogeusia,taste disturbances
                tonsillectomy, taste, ageusia, hypogeusia, taste disturbances

                Comments

                Comment on this article