12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Habermas, Rorty e o pragmatismo americano Translated title: Habermas, Rorty et le pragmatisme américain Translated title: Habermas, Rorty, and American pragmatism

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Translated abstract

          Dans cet article, on vise deux objectifs: le premier, c'est de comparer comment deux des plus influents penseurs du temps présent - Richard Rorty et Jürgen Habermas - se rattachent au legs du pragmatisme philosophique américain; le second, à partir de ce cas, est d'illustrer une proposition de nature métathéorique: le rapprochement Rorty/Habermas peut permettre de présenter ce qu'on nomme ici "pluralisme dialogique", c'est-à-dire une perspective théorico-méthodologique qui, inspirée du pragmatisme américain de Dewey et Mead, refuse la distinction entre théorie et histoire de la théorie. Au contraire, le pluralisme dialogique conçoit le passé des sciences sociales comme un réservoir de trésors oubliés dont il faut tenir compte afin de mieux résoudre les questions de notre temps.

          Translated abstract

          This article has two main objectives: 1) to compare how two of the most influential contemporary thinkers, Richard Rorty and Jürgen Habermas, relate to the legacy of American philosophical pragmatism and 2) to use this case to illustrate a meta-theoretical proposal of mine. The Rorty/Habermas comparison will allow me to present what I refer to as "dialogical pluralism", that is, a theoretical and methodological perspective which, inspired by the American pragmatism of Dewey and Mead, refuses to adopt the separation between theory and history of theory. On the contrary, the dialogical pluralism that I propose conceives social sciences’ past as a repository of forgotten treasures that must be urgently reconstructed in order to better solve the problems of our time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Mind, self, and society

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Logic: the theory of inquiry

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Knowledge and human interests

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                s_dados
                Dados
                Dados
                Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil )
                0011-5258
                2006
                : 49
                : 1
                : 99-117
                Affiliations
                [01] orgnameUniversidade de Lisboa orgdiv1Instituto de Ciências Sociais
                Article
                S0011-52582006000100005 S0011-5258(06)04900105
                e3e4ba4a-bddb-4770-9ad9-6e86b5b8a7c1

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                History
                : September 2005
                : January 2006
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 16, Pages: 19
                Product

                SciELO Brazil


                Habermas,Rorty,pluralisme dialogique,pragmatisme,pragmatism,dialogical pluralism

                Comments

                Comment on this article