31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Analysis of the Benefits and Costs of a National Campaign to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening: CDC’s Screen for Life—National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Screen for Life: National Colorectal Cancer Action Campaign (SFL) is one of the longest running national multimedia campaigns to promote colorectal cancer screening. Since its inception in 1999, no study has quantified the benefits and costs of SFL. We modeled the impact of SFL campaign on screening rates, assuming that the effect size would range from 0.5% to 10% of the unscreened population exposed to the campaign in the last 14 years. Given the estimated benefits of the campaign and costs, we calculated the cost per person screened (2012 dollars). We hypothesize that if 0.5% of the population exposed to campaign messages were screened for colorectal cancer, an additional 251,000 previously unscreened individuals would be screened. The average cost of SFL per person screened would be $2.44. On the other hand, if 10% of the population exposed to campaign messages were screened, an additional 5.01 million individuals would be screened. The average cost per person screened would be $0.12. Results indicate that SFL improves screening rates at a relatively low cost per person screened. The findings in this study provide an important starting point and benchmark for future research efforts to determine the benefits and costs of health communication campaigns to promote cancer prevention.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          100890609
          31704
          Health Promot Pract
          Health Promot Pract
          Health promotion practice
          1524-8399
          23 February 2018
          06 February 2014
          September 2014
          05 March 2018
          : 15
          : 5
          : 750-758
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
          [2 ]Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
          [3 ]Soltera Center for Cancer Prevention and Control, Tucson, AZ, USA
          Author notes
          Address correspondence to Donatus U. Ekwueme, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, MS K-76, Chamblee, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA; dce3@ 123456cdc.gov
          Article
          PMC5836740 PMC5836740 5836740 hhspa945553
          10.1177/1524839913519446
          5836740
          24505055
          e4a98562-96df-42aa-869a-d3ade6b1c460
          History
          Categories
          Article

          benefits,cancer prevention and control,colorectal cancer,health promotion,health communication,mass media,costs

          Comments

          Comment on this article