11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      AABB Committee Report: reducing transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus infections.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Transfusion-transmitted cytomegalovirus (TT-CMV) is often asymptomatic, but certain patient populations, such as very low birth weight neonates, fetuses requiring intrauterine transfusion, pregnant women, patients with primary immunodeficiencies, transplant recipients, and patients receiving chemotherapy or transplantation for malignant disease, may be at risk of life-threatening CMV infection. It is unclear whether leukoreduction of cellular blood components is sufficient to reduce TT-CMV or whether CMV serological testing adds additional benefit to leukoreduction. The AABB CMV Prevention Work Group commissioned a systematic review to address these issues and subsequently develop clinical practice guidelines. However, the data were of poor quality, and no studies of significant size have been performed for over a decade. Rather than creating guidelines of questionable utility, the Work Group (with approval of the AABB Board of Directors) voted to prepare this Committee Report. There is wide variation in practices of using leukoreduced components alone or combining CMV-serology and leukoreduction to prevent TT-CMV for at-risk patients. Other approaches may also be feasible to prevent TT-CMV, including plasma nucleic acid testing, pathogen inactivation, and patient blood management programs to reduce the frequency of inappropriate transfusions. It is unlikely that future large-scale clinical trials will be performed to determine whether leukoreduction, CMV-serology, or a combination of both is superior. Consequently, alternative strategies including pragmatic randomized controlled trials, registries, and collaborations for electronic data merging, nontraditional approaches to inform evidence, or development of a systematic approach to inform expert opinion may help to address the issue of CMV-safe blood components.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Transfusion
          Transfusion
          Wiley
          1537-2995
          0041-1132
          June 2016
          : 56
          : 6 Pt 2
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Medicine, McMaster Centre for Transfusion Research.
          [2 ] Canadian Blood Services & Division of Clinical Pathology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
          [3 ] Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
          [4 ] Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
          [5 ] Department of Pathology, Bellevue Hospital Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
          [6 ] University of British Columbia, Victoria, Canada, and Medical Advisor to AABB, Bethesda, Maryland.
          [7 ] Division of Transfusion Medicine, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
          [8 ] Division of Laboratory Medicine, Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology, Children's National Medical Center, George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.
          [9 ] Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
          Article
          10.1111/trf.13503
          26968400
          e4aeae54-0c71-4381-8cdf-c26414ea94ae
          © 2016 AABB.
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article