0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Rapid apprehension of the coherence of action scenes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Speed of processing in the human visual system.

          How long does it take for the human visual system to process a complex natural image? Subjectively, recognition of familiar objects and scenes appears to be virtually instantaneous, but measuring this processing time experimentally has proved difficult. Behavioural measures such as reaction times can be used, but these include not only visual processing but also the time required for response execution. However, event-related potentials (ERPs) can sometimes reveal signs of neural processing well before the motor output. Here we use a go/no-go categorization task in which subjects have to decide whether a previously unseen photograph, flashed on for just 20 ms, contains an animal. ERP analysis revealed a frontal negativity specific to no-go trials that develops roughly 150 ms after stimulus onset. We conclude that the visual processing needed to perform this highly demanding task can be achieved in under 150 ms.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Visual objects in context.

            Moshe Bar (2004)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis.

              Threatening, friendly, and neutral faces were presented to test the hypothesis of the facilitated perceptual processing of threatening faces. Dense sensor event-related brain potentials were measured while subjects viewed facial stimuli. Subjects had no explicit task for emotional categorization of the faces. Assessing early perceptual stimulus processing, threatening faces elicited an early posterior negativity compared with nonthreatening neutral or friendly expressions. Moreover, at later stages of stimulus processing, facial threat also elicited augmented late positive potentials relative to the other facial expressions, indicating the more elaborate perceptual analysis of these stimuli. Taken together, these data demonstrate the facilitated perceptual processing of threatening faces. Results are discussed within the context of an evolved module of fear (A. Ohman & S. Mineka, 2001). Copyright 2004 American Psychological Association
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
                Psychon Bull Rev
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                1069-9384
                1531-5320
                October 2016
                January 29 2016
                October 2016
                : 23
                : 5
                : 1566-1575
                Article
                10.3758/s13423-016-1004-y
                26833315
                e54693f6-116e-4d97-b62c-21d651810ab7
                © 2016

                http://www.springer.com/tdm

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article