0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Long term impacts of endozoochory and salinity on germination of wetland plants after entering simulated seed banks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Migratory waterbirds disperse a broad range of angiosperms by endozoochory (seed dispersal via gut passage), especially plants in coastal wetlands. However, there is no previous information about the capacity of seeds to remain in the seed bank after waterbird endozoochory, and very little about how wetland salinity can influence the effect of gut passage on germination. We collected seeds of Juncus subulatus (Juncaceae), Bolboschoenus maritimus, and Schoenoplectus litoralis (Cyperaceae) from Doñana marshes in Spain. All three species are considered to have physiological dormancy. After gut passage following ingestion by ducks, seeds were stored in darkness in solutions with six different conductivities (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 dSm -1), for periods of 1, 6, or 12 months to simulate presence in a seed bank. After storage, 1800 seeds of each plant species assigned to these treatments were subjected to germination tests in demineralized water, together with 1800 control seeds that had not been ingested before storage. All species germinated readily after storage, with or without gut passage beforehand. Storage time and salinity both had important effects on germinability and time to germination, which differed between control and ingested seeds, and between plant species. After ≥6 months, germinability of Cyperaceae was enhanced by gut passage (≤25% higher than control seeds) at some salinities. Only J. subulatus showed consistently lower germinability after passage (≤30%). Only B. maritimus showed consistently slower germination after passage (≤33%). Salinity effects were more complex after passage, but increasing salinity did not generally have a negative impact on germination of ingested seeds. When compared to additional seeds that had not been stored before germination tests, storage reduced germinability in J. subulatus (≤39% reduction), but increased it in B. maritimus (≤17%) and S. litoralis (≤46%). Seeds dispersed by waterbird endozoochory may be easily incorporated into wetland seed banks, where they can remain halotolerant and delay germination until conditions become suitable. This can benefit wetland plants by increasing rates of long-distance dispersal, gene flow, and establishment of new populations. Avian gut passage can have positive and species-specific effects on germination in plants with persistent seed banks and/or physiological dormancy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A classification system for seed dormancy

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Status, distribution and long-term changes in the waterbird community wintering in Doñana, south–west Spain

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A general framework for effectiveness concepts in mutualisms.

              A core interest in studies of mutualistic interactions is the 'effectiveness' of mutualists in providing benefits to their partners. In plant-animal mutualisms it is widely accepted that the total effect of a mutualist on its partner is estimated as (1) a 'quantity' component multiplied by (2) a 'quality' component, although the meanings of 'effectiveness,' 'quantity,' and 'quality' and which terms are applied to these metrics vary greatly across studies. In addition, a similar quantity × quality = total effect approach has not been applied to other types of mutualisms, although it could be informative. Lastly, when a total effect approach has been applied, it has invariably been from a phytocentric perspective, focussing on the effects of animal mutualists on their plant partner. This lack of a common framework of 'effectiveness' of mutualistic interactions limits generalisation and the development of a broader understanding of the ecology and evolution of mutualisms. In this paper, we propose a general framework and demonstrate its utility by applying it to both partners in five different types of mutualisms: pollination, seed dispersal, plant protection, rhizobial, and mycorrhizal mutualisms. We then briefly discuss the flexibility of the framework, potential limitations, and relationship to other approaches.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/90615Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/491227Role: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Plant Sci
                Front Plant Sci
                Front. Plant Sci.
                Frontiers in Plant Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-462X
                31 October 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1275622
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Tragsatec , Seville, Spain
                [2] 2 Department of Conservation Biology and Global Change, Estación Biológica de Doñana, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) , Seville, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: Jialin Li, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China

                Reviewed by: Ganesh K. Jaganathan, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, China; Jesús Manuel Castillo, Sevilla University, Spain

                *Correspondence: Andy J. Green, ajgreen@ 123456ebd.csic.es

                †ORCID: José L. Espinar, orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-1690; Jordi Figuerola, orcid.org/0000-0002-4664-9011; Andy J. Green, orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-4951

                Article
                10.3389/fpls.2023.1275622
                10644059
                e57bbbf2-9d89-4104-8e8e-79f3a9f1002c
                Copyright © 2023 Espinar, Figuerola and Green

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 10 August 2023
                : 16 October 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 70, Pages: 13, Words: 6137
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad project CGL2016-76067-P (AEI/FEDER, EU), and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación project PID2020-112774GB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (to AG).
                Categories
                Plant Science
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                Functional Plant Ecology

                Plant science & Botany
                anatidae,dormancy,endozoochory,germination,salinity,seed banks,seed dispersal,waterbirds

                Comments

                Comment on this article