12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of Intraoperative Insufflation With Warmed, Humidified CO 2 during Abdominal Surgery: A Review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          During a laparotomy, the peritoneum is exposed to the cold, dry ambient air of the operating room (20℃, 0%–5% relative humidity). The aim of this review is to determine whether the use of humidified and/or warmed CO 2 in the intraperitoneal environment during open or laparoscopic operations influences postoperative outcomes.

          Methods

          A review was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase databases were searched for articles published between 1980 and 2016 (October). Comparative studies on humans or nonhuman animals that involved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort studies were included. Both laparotomy and laparoscopic studies were included. The primary outcomes identified were peritoneal inflammation, core body temperature, and postoperative pain.

          Results

          The literature search identified 37 articles for analysis, including 30 RCTs, 7 prospective cohort studies, 23 human studies, and 14 animal studies. Four studies found that compared with warmed/humidified CO 2, cold, dry CO 2 resulted in significant peritoneal injury, with greater lymphocytic infiltration, higher proinflammatory cytokine levels and peritoneal adhesion formation. Seven of 15 human RCTs reported a significantly higher core body temperature in the warmed, humidified CO 2 group than in the cold, dry CO 2 group. Seven human RCTs found lower postoperative pain with the use of humidified, warmed CO 2.

          Conclusion

          While evidence supporting the benefits of using humidified and warmed CO 2 can be found in the literature, a large human RCT is required to validate these findings.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mild hypothermia increases blood loss and transfusion requirements during total hip arthroplasty.

          In-vitro studies indicate that platelet function and the coagulation cascade are impaired by hypothermia. However, the extent to which perioperative hypothermia influences bleeding during surgery remains unknown. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that mild hypothermia increases blood loss and allogeneic transfusion requirements during hip arthroplasty. Blood loss and transfusion requirements were evaluated in 60 patients undergoing primary, unilateral total hip arthroplasties who were randomly assigned to normothermia (final intraoperative core temperature 36.6 [0.4] degrees C) or mild hypothermia (35.0 [0.5] degrees C). Crystalloid, colloid, scavenged red cells, and allogeneic blood were administered by strict protocol. Intra- and postoperative blood loss was significantly greater in the hypothermic patients: 2.2 (0.5) L vs 1.7 (0.3) L, p < 0.001). Eight units of allogeneic packed red cells were required in seven of the 30 hypothermic patients, whereas only one normothermic patient required a unit of allogeneic blood (p < 0.05 for administered volume). A typical decrease in core temperature in patients undergoing hip arthroplasty will thus augment blood loss by approximately 500 mL. The maintenance of intraoperative normothermia reduces blood loss and allogeneic blood requirements in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The importance of airborne bacterial contamination of wounds.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Heated and humidified CO2 prevents hypothermia, peritoneal injury, and intra-abdominal adhesions during prolonged laparoscopic insufflations.

              Insufflation with standard cold-dry CO(2) during laparoscopic surgery has been shown to predispose patients to hypothermia and peritoneal injury. This study aimed to compare the effect of prolonged cold-dry CO(2) insufflation with heated-humidified CO(2) insufflation (3-5 h) on hypothermia, peritoneal damage, and intra-abdominal adhesion formation in a rat model. A total of 160 Wistar rats were randomized to undergo no insufflation or insufflation with cold-dry CO(2) (21 degrees C, <1% relative humidity) or heated-humidified CO(2) (37 degrees C, 95% relative humidity) for 3, 4, or 5 h. Core body temperature was measured via rectum before and during insufflations. Peritoneal samples were taken at 6, 24, 48, and 96 h after treatments and analyzed with light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Intra-abdominal adhesions were evaluated 2 weeks later. Core body temperature significantly decreased in the cold-dry group, whereas it was maintained and increased in the heated-humidified group. Scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy studies showed intense peritoneal injury in the cold-dry CO(2) group but significantly less damages in the heated-humidified group. Increased intra-abdominal adhesion formation was observed in the cold-dry CO(2) group, while no adhesions were found in the rats insufflated with heated-humidified CO(2). Heated-humidified CO(2) insufflation results in significantly less hypothermia, less peritoneal damage, and decreased adhesion formation as compared with cold-dry CO(2) insufflation. Heated-humidified CO(2) may be more suitable for insufflation application in prolonged laparoscopic surgery.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Coloproctol
                Ann Coloproctol
                ACP
                Annals of Coloproctology
                Korean Society of Coloproctology
                2287-9714
                2287-9722
                June 2018
                30 June 2018
                : 34
                : 3
                : 125-137
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Colorectal Surgical Department, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                [2 ]Discipline of Pathology, Charles Perkins Centre, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Ju Yong Cheong, MBBS, MS, FRACS Concord Institute of Academic Surgery, Colorectal Surgical Department, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Teaching Hospital of University of Sydney, The University of Sydney, Sydney Medical School, Hospital Road, Concord, NSW 2139, Australia Tel: +61-2-409-110-219 E-mail: Juyong.cheong@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1600-7632
                Article
                ac-2017-09-26
                10.3393/ac.2017.09.26
                6046539
                29991201
                e5889645-26f0-4421-a124-c88abe582e8e
                Copyright © 2018 The Korean Society of Coloproctology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 January 2017
                : 26 September 2017
                Categories
                Original Article

                humidified,carbon dioxide,pneumoperitoneum,surgical adhesions,intraperitoneal inflammation

                Comments

                Comment on this article