Predicting Language Outcome After Left Hemispherotomy : A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Objective

Hemidecortication is a therapeutic option in patients with drug-resistant structural epilepsy. If surgery is performed early enough in left-hemispheric pathology, the plasticity of the developing brain may enable the right hemisphere to take over language—if this has not occurred before surgery. A systematic overview of potential predictors of language outcome after left hemidecortication in children is warranted.

Methods

In a systematic literature review, we analyzed 58 studies on language lateralization after congenital or postneonatally acquired left-hemispheric pathology, and on language outcome after left-sided hemidisconnection, such as hemispherotomy. Single-subject data were pooled to determine the distribution of lateralization across etiologies in congenital lesions and across age groups in acute postneonatal lesions. A hierarchical linear regression assessed the influence of age at surgery, lesion type, age at seizure onset, and presurgery language function on language outcome after left hemidecortication.

Results

In acute postneonatal lesions, younger age at injury was significantly associated with right-sided language lateralization (Cramér V = 0.458; p = 0.039). In patients with hemidecortication, age at surgery was not significantly associated with language outcome (Cramér V = −0.056; p = 0.584). Presurgical language function was the most powerful predictor for postsurgical language outcome ( F _4,47 = 7.35, p < 0.0001), with good presurgical language bearing the risk of postsurgical deterioration. In congenital pathology, right-sided language lateralization was most frequent in pre-/perinatal stroke (Cramér V = 0.357; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

We propose a presurgical decision algorithm with age, presurgical language function, language lateralization, and left-hemispheric structural pathology as decision points regarding surgery.